From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/61] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner.
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 14:59:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201002125939.50817-33-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201002125939.50817-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
By default, we assume that it's called inside igt_create_request
to keep existing selftests working, but allow for manual pinning
when passing a ww context.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c | 136 ++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.h | 5 +
2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
index ec0ecb4e4ca6..9c461edb0b73 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c
@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@
int igt_spinner_init(struct igt_spinner *spin, struct intel_gt *gt)
{
- unsigned int mode;
- void *vaddr;
int err;
memset(spin, 0, sizeof(*spin));
@@ -23,6 +21,7 @@ int igt_spinner_init(struct igt_spinner *spin, struct intel_gt *gt)
err = PTR_ERR(spin->hws);
goto err;
}
+ i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(spin->hws, I915_CACHE_LLC);
spin->obj = i915_gem_object_create_internal(gt->i915, PAGE_SIZE);
if (IS_ERR(spin->obj)) {
@@ -30,34 +29,83 @@ int igt_spinner_init(struct igt_spinner *spin, struct intel_gt *gt)
goto err_hws;
}
- i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(spin->hws, I915_CACHE_LLC);
- vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(spin->hws, I915_MAP_WB);
- if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
- goto err_obj;
- }
- spin->seqno = memset(vaddr, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
-
- mode = i915_coherent_map_type(gt->i915);
- vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(spin->obj, mode);
- if (IS_ERR(vaddr)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(vaddr);
- goto err_unpin_hws;
- }
- spin->batch = vaddr;
-
return 0;
-err_unpin_hws:
- i915_gem_object_unpin_map(spin->hws);
-err_obj:
- i915_gem_object_put(spin->obj);
err_hws:
i915_gem_object_put(spin->hws);
err:
return err;
}
+static void *igt_spinner_pin_obj(struct intel_context *ce,
+ struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+ unsigned int mode, struct i915_vma **vma)
+{
+ void *vaddr;
+ int ret;
+
+ *vma = i915_vma_instance(obj, ce->vm, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(*vma))
+ return ERR_CAST(*vma);
+
+ ret = i915_gem_object_lock(obj, ww);
+ if (ret)
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+ vaddr = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, mode);
+
+ if (!ww)
+ i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(vaddr))
+ return vaddr;
+
+ if (ww)
+ ret = i915_vma_pin_ww(*vma, ww, 0, 0, PIN_USER);
+ else
+ ret = i915_vma_pin(*vma, 0, 0, PIN_USER);
+
+ if (ret) {
+ i915_gem_object_unpin_map(obj);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ }
+
+ return vaddr;
+}
+
+int igt_spinner_pin(struct igt_spinner *spin,
+ struct intel_context *ce,
+ struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww)
+{
+ void *vaddr;
+
+ if (spin->ce && WARN_ON(spin->ce != ce))
+ return -ENODEV;
+ spin->ce = ce;
+
+ if (!spin->seqno) {
+ vaddr = igt_spinner_pin_obj(ce, ww, spin->hws, I915_MAP_WB, &spin->hws_vma);
+ if (IS_ERR(vaddr))
+ return PTR_ERR(vaddr);
+
+ spin->seqno = memset(vaddr, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
+ }
+
+ if (!spin->batch) {
+ unsigned int mode =
+ i915_coherent_map_type(spin->gt->i915);
+
+ vaddr = igt_spinner_pin_obj(ce, ww, spin->obj, mode, &spin->batch_vma);
+ if (IS_ERR(vaddr))
+ return PTR_ERR(vaddr);
+
+ spin->batch = vaddr;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static unsigned int seqno_offset(u64 fence)
{
return offset_in_page(sizeof(u32) * fence);
@@ -102,27 +150,18 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin,
if (!intel_engine_can_store_dword(ce->engine))
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
- vma = i915_vma_instance(spin->obj, ce->vm, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(vma))
- return ERR_CAST(vma);
-
- hws = i915_vma_instance(spin->hws, ce->vm, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(hws))
- return ERR_CAST(hws);
+ if (!spin->batch) {
+ err = igt_spinner_pin(spin, ce, NULL);
+ if (err)
+ return ERR_PTR(err);
+ }
- err = i915_vma_pin(vma, 0, 0, PIN_USER);
- if (err)
- return ERR_PTR(err);
-
- err = i915_vma_pin(hws, 0, 0, PIN_USER);
- if (err)
- goto unpin_vma;
+ hws = spin->hws_vma;
+ vma = spin->batch_vma;
rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
- if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(rq);
- goto unpin_hws;
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(rq))
+ return ERR_CAST(rq);
err = move_to_active(vma, rq, 0);
if (err)
@@ -185,10 +224,6 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin,
i915_request_set_error_once(rq, err);
i915_request_add(rq);
}
-unpin_hws:
- i915_vma_unpin(hws);
-unpin_vma:
- i915_vma_unpin(vma);
return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : rq;
}
@@ -202,6 +237,9 @@ hws_seqno(const struct igt_spinner *spin, const struct i915_request *rq)
void igt_spinner_end(struct igt_spinner *spin)
{
+ if (!spin->batch)
+ return;
+
*spin->batch = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
intel_gt_chipset_flush(spin->gt);
}
@@ -210,10 +248,16 @@ void igt_spinner_fini(struct igt_spinner *spin)
{
igt_spinner_end(spin);
- i915_gem_object_unpin_map(spin->obj);
+ if (spin->batch) {
+ i915_vma_unpin(spin->batch_vma);
+ i915_gem_object_unpin_map(spin->obj);
+ }
i915_gem_object_put(spin->obj);
- i915_gem_object_unpin_map(spin->hws);
+ if (spin->seqno) {
+ i915_vma_unpin(spin->hws_vma);
+ i915_gem_object_unpin_map(spin->hws);
+ }
i915_gem_object_put(spin->hws);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.h
index ec62c9ef320b..fbe5b1625b05 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.h
@@ -20,11 +20,16 @@ struct igt_spinner {
struct intel_gt *gt;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *hws;
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+ struct intel_context *ce;
+ struct i915_vma *hws_vma, *batch_vma;
u32 *batch;
void *seqno;
};
int igt_spinner_init(struct igt_spinner *spin, struct intel_gt *gt);
+int igt_spinner_pin(struct igt_spinner *spin,
+ struct intel_context *ce,
+ struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww);
void igt_spinner_fini(struct igt_spinner *spin);
struct i915_request *
--
2.28.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-02 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-02 12:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/61] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/61] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/61] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/61] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/61] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/61] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/61] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/61] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/61] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/61] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/61] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 20:14 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2020-10-12 14:13 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-19 17:54 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/61] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/61] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/61] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/61] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/61] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/61] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/61] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/61] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/61] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/61] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/61] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/61] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/61] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/61] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/61] drm/i915: Make intel_init_workaround_bb more compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/61] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/61] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/61] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/61] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/61] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/61] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/61] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/61] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/61] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/61] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/61] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 54/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 55/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 56/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 57/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 58/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 59/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 60/61] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 61/61] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 13:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Patchwork
2020-10-02 18:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-02 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/61] " Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201002125939.50817-33-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox