public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/61] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf.
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2020 14:59:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201002125939.50817-35-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201002125939.50817-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

We need to lock a few more objects, some temporarily,
add ww lock where needed.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index e94976976571..281af1fdf514 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ static int alloc_oa_buffer(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
 	stream->oa_buffer.vma = vma;
 
 	stream->oa_buffer.vaddr =
-		i915_gem_object_pin_map(bo, I915_MAP_WB);
+		i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(bo, I915_MAP_WB);
 	if (IS_ERR(stream->oa_buffer.vaddr)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(stream->oa_buffer.vaddr);
 		goto err_unpin;
@@ -1632,6 +1632,7 @@ static int alloc_noa_wait(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
 	const u32 base = stream->engine->mmio_base;
 #define CS_GPR(x) GEN8_RING_CS_GPR(base, x)
 	u32 *batch, *ts0, *cs, *jump;
+	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
 	int ret, i;
 	enum {
 		START_TS,
@@ -1649,15 +1650,21 @@ static int alloc_noa_wait(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
 		return PTR_ERR(bo);
 	}
 
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
+retry:
+	ret = i915_gem_object_lock(bo, &ww);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_ww;
+
 	/*
 	 * We pin in GGTT because we jump into this buffer now because
 	 * multiple OA config BOs will have a jump to this address and it
 	 * needs to be fixed during the lifetime of the i915/perf stream.
 	 */
-	vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(bo, NULL, 0, 0, PIN_HIGH);
+	vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(bo, &ww, NULL, 0, 0, PIN_HIGH);
 	if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(vma);
-		goto err_unref;
+		goto out_ww;
 	}
 
 	batch = cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(bo, I915_MAP_WB);
@@ -1791,12 +1798,19 @@ static int alloc_noa_wait(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
 	__i915_gem_object_release_map(bo);
 
 	stream->noa_wait = vma;
-	return 0;
+	goto out_ww;
 
 err_unpin:
 	i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&vma, 0);
-err_unref:
-	i915_gem_object_put(bo);
+out_ww:
+	if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
+		ret = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+		if (!ret)
+			goto retry;
+	}
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
+	if (ret)
+		i915_gem_object_put(bo);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1839,6 +1853,7 @@ alloc_oa_config_buffer(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
 {
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 	struct i915_oa_config_bo *oa_bo;
+	struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
 	size_t config_length = 0;
 	u32 *cs;
 	int err;
@@ -1859,10 +1874,16 @@ alloc_oa_config_buffer(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
 		goto err_free;
 	}
 
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, true);
+retry:
+	err = i915_gem_object_lock(obj, &ww);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_ww;
+
 	cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, I915_MAP_WB);
 	if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(cs);
-		goto err_oa_bo;
+		goto out_ww;
 	}
 
 	cs = write_cs_mi_lri(cs,
@@ -1890,19 +1911,28 @@ alloc_oa_config_buffer(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
 				       NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(oa_bo->vma)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(oa_bo->vma);
-		goto err_oa_bo;
+		goto out_ww;
 	}
 
 	oa_bo->oa_config = i915_oa_config_get(oa_config);
 	llist_add(&oa_bo->node, &stream->oa_config_bos);
 
-	return oa_bo;
+out_ww:
+	if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+		err = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+		if (!err)
+			goto retry;
+	}
+	i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
 
-err_oa_bo:
-	i915_gem_object_put(obj);
+	if (err)
+		i915_gem_object_put(obj);
 err_free:
-	kfree(oa_bo);
-	return ERR_PTR(err);
+	if (err) {
+		kfree(oa_bo);
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+	}
+	return oa_bo;
 }
 
 static struct i915_vma *
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-02 12:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/61] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/61] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/61] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/61] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/61] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/61] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/61] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/61] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/61] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/61] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/61] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 20:14   ` Ruhl, Michael J
2020-10-12 14:13     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-19 17:54       ` Ruhl, Michael J
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/61] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/61] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/61] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/61] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/61] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/61] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/61] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/61] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/61] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/61] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/61] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/61] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/61] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/61] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/61] drm/i915: Make intel_init_workaround_bb more compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/61] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/61] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/61] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/61] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/61] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/61] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/61] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/61] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/61] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/61] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/61] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 54/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 55/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 56/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 57/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 58/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 59/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 60/61] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 12:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 61/61] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-02 13:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Patchwork
2020-10-02 18:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-10-02 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/61] " Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201002125939.50817-35-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox