public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 30/61] drm/i915: Fix workarounds selftest, part 1
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 16:46:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201012144706.555345-31-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201012144706.555345-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

pin_map needs the ww lock, so ensure we pin both before submission.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h    |  3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c     | 12 +++
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c    | 76 ++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
index 9e87a2547b0d..8db84ce09d9f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ enum i915_map_type {
 void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 					   enum i915_map_type type);
 
+void *__must_check i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+						    enum i915_map_type type);
+
 void __i915_gem_object_flush_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 				 unsigned long offset,
 				 unsigned long size);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
index 00ce88c609f9..ef1d5fabd077 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
@@ -409,6 +409,18 @@ void *i915_gem_object_pin_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	goto out_unlock;
 }
 
+void *i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+				       enum i915_map_type type)
+{
+	void *ret;
+
+	i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
+	ret = i915_gem_object_pin_map(obj, type);
+	i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 void __i915_gem_object_flush_map(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 				 unsigned long offset,
 				 unsigned long size)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
index 810ab026a55e..69da2147ed3b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ read_nonprivs(struct i915_gem_context *ctx, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 
 	i915_gem_object_set_cache_coherency(result, I915_CACHE_LLC);
 
-	cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(result, I915_MAP_WB);
+	cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(result, I915_MAP_WB);
 	if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(cs);
 		goto err_obj;
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int check_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 	i915_gem_object_lock(results, NULL);
 	intel_wedge_on_timeout(&wedge, engine->gt, HZ / 5) /* safety net! */
 		err = i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(results, false);
-	i915_gem_object_unlock(results);
+
 	if (intel_gt_is_wedged(engine->gt))
 		err = -EIO;
 	if (err)
@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static int check_whitelist(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 
 	i915_gem_object_unpin_map(results);
 out_put:
+	i915_gem_object_unlock(results);
 	i915_gem_object_put(results);
 	return err;
 }
@@ -520,6 +521,7 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < engine->whitelist.count; i++) {
 		u32 reg = i915_mmio_reg_offset(engine->whitelist.list[i].reg);
+		struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww;
 		u64 addr = scratch->node.start;
 		struct i915_request *rq;
 		u32 srm, lrm, rsvd;
@@ -535,6 +537,29 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
 
 		ro_reg = ro_register(reg);
 
+		i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, false);
+retry:
+		cs = NULL;
+		err = i915_gem_object_lock(scratch->obj, &ww);
+		if (!err)
+			err = i915_gem_object_lock(batch->obj, &ww);
+		if (!err)
+			err = intel_context_pin_ww(ce, &ww);
+		if (err)
+			goto out;
+
+		cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch->obj, I915_MAP_WC);
+		if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(cs);
+			goto out_ctx;
+		}
+
+		results = i915_gem_object_pin_map(scratch->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
+		if (IS_ERR(results)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(results);
+			goto out_unmap_batch;
+		}
+
 		/* Clear non priv flags */
 		reg &= RING_FORCE_TO_NONPRIV_ADDRESS_MASK;
 
@@ -546,12 +571,6 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
 		pr_debug("%s: Writing garbage to %x\n",
 			 engine->name, reg);
 
-		cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch->obj, I915_MAP_WC);
-		if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
-			err = PTR_ERR(cs);
-			goto out_batch;
-		}
-
 		/* SRM original */
 		*cs++ = srm;
 		*cs++ = reg;
@@ -598,11 +617,12 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
 		i915_gem_object_flush_map(batch->obj);
 		i915_gem_object_unpin_map(batch->obj);
 		intel_gt_chipset_flush(engine->gt);
+		cs = NULL;
 
-		rq = intel_context_create_request(ce);
+		rq = i915_request_create(ce);
 		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
 			err = PTR_ERR(rq);
-			goto out_batch;
+			goto out_unmap_scratch;
 		}
 
 		if (engine->emit_init_breadcrumb) { /* Be nice if we hang */
@@ -611,20 +631,16 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
 				goto err_request;
 		}
 
-		i915_vma_lock(batch);
 		err = i915_request_await_object(rq, batch->obj, false);
 		if (err == 0)
 			err = i915_vma_move_to_active(batch, rq, 0);
-		i915_vma_unlock(batch);
 		if (err)
 			goto err_request;
 
-		i915_vma_lock(scratch);
 		err = i915_request_await_object(rq, scratch->obj, true);
 		if (err == 0)
 			err = i915_vma_move_to_active(scratch, rq,
 						      EXEC_OBJECT_WRITE);
-		i915_vma_unlock(scratch);
 		if (err)
 			goto err_request;
 
@@ -640,13 +656,7 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
 			pr_err("%s: Futzing %x timedout; cancelling test\n",
 			       engine->name, reg);
 			intel_gt_set_wedged(engine->gt);
-			goto out_batch;
-		}
-
-		results = i915_gem_object_pin_map(scratch->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
-		if (IS_ERR(results)) {
-			err = PTR_ERR(results);
-			goto out_batch;
+			goto out_unmap_scratch;
 		}
 
 		GEM_BUG_ON(values[ARRAY_SIZE(values) - 1] != 0xffffffff);
@@ -657,7 +667,7 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
 				pr_err("%s: Unable to write to whitelisted register %x\n",
 				       engine->name, reg);
 				err = -EINVAL;
-				goto out_unpin;
+				goto out_unmap_scratch;
 			}
 		} else {
 			rsvd = 0;
@@ -723,15 +733,27 @@ static int check_dirty_whitelist(struct intel_context *ce)
 
 			err = -EINVAL;
 		}
-out_unpin:
+out_unmap_scratch:
 		i915_gem_object_unpin_map(scratch->obj);
+out_unmap_batch:
+		if (cs)
+			i915_gem_object_unpin_map(batch->obj);
+out_ctx:
+		intel_context_unpin(ce);
+out:
+		if (err == -EDEADLK) {
+			err = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww);
+			if (!err)
+				goto retry;
+		}
+		i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww);
 		if (err)
 			break;
 	}
 
 	if (igt_flush_test(engine->i915))
 		err = -EIO;
-out_batch:
+
 	i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&batch, 0);
 out_scratch:
 	i915_vma_unpin_and_release(&scratch, 0);
@@ -868,7 +890,7 @@ static int scrub_whitelisted_registers(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 	if (IS_ERR(batch))
 		return PTR_ERR(batch);
 
-	cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map(batch->obj, I915_MAP_WC);
+	cs = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(batch->obj, I915_MAP_WC);
 	if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(cs);
 		goto err_batch;
@@ -1003,11 +1025,11 @@ check_whitelisted_registers(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	u32 *a, *b;
 	int i, err;
 
-	a = i915_gem_object_pin_map(A->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
+	a = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(A->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
 	if (IS_ERR(a))
 		return PTR_ERR(a);
 
-	b = i915_gem_object_pin_map(B->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
+	b = i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked(B->obj, I915_MAP_WB);
 	if (IS_ERR(b)) {
 		err = PTR_ERR(b);
 		goto err_a;
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-12 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-12 14:46 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/61] drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/61] drm/i915: Move cmd parser pinning to execbuffer Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/61] drm/i915: Add missing -EDEADLK handling to execbuf pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/61] drm/i915: Do not share hwsp across contexts any more, v3 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/61] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the object mutex in pin correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/61] drm/i915: Add gem object locking to madvise Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/61] drm/i915: Move HAS_STRUCT_PAGE to obj->flags Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/61] drm/i915: Rework struct phys attachment handling Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/61] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object_attach_phys() to ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/61] drm/i915: make lockdep slightly happier about execbuf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/61] drm/i915: Disable userptr pread/pwrite support Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/61] drm/i915: No longer allow exporting userptr through dma-buf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/61] drm/i915: Reject more ioctls for userptr Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/61] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/61] drm/i915: Fix userptr so we do not have to worry about obj->mm.lock, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 17:05   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/61] drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/61] drm/i915: Pin timeline map after first timeline pin, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/61] drm/i915: Populate logical context during first pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/61] drm/i915: Make ring submission compatible with obj->mm.lock removal, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/61] drm/i915: Handle ww locking in init_status_page Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/61] drm/i915: Rework clflush to work correctly without obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 21/61] drm/i915: Pass ww ctx to intel_pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 22/61] drm/i915: Add object locking to vm_fault_cpu Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 23/61] drm/i915: Move pinning to inside engine_wa_list_verify() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 24/61] drm/i915: Take reservation lock around i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 25/61] drm/i915: Make intel_init_workaround_bb more compatible with ww locking Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 26/61] drm/i915: Make __engine_unpark() " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 27/61] drm/i915: Take obj lock around set_domain ioctl Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 28/61] drm/i915: Defer pin calls in buffer pool until first use by caller Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 29/61] drm/i915: Fix pread/pwrite to work with new locking rules Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 31/61] drm/i915: Prepare for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 32/61] drm/i915: Add igt_spinner_pin() to allow for ww locking around spinner Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 33/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking around vm_access() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 34/61] drm/i915: Increase ww locking for perf Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 35/61] drm/i915: Lock ww in ucode objects correctly Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 36/61] drm/i915: Add ww locking to dma-buf ops Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 37/61] drm/i915: Add missing ww lock in intel_dsb_prepare Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 38/61] drm/i915: Fix ww locking in shmem_create_from_object Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 39/61] drm/i915: Use a single page table lock for each gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 40/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare huge_pages testcases for obj->mm.lock removal Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 41/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare client blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 42/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare coherency tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 43/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 44/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare dma-buf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 45/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execbuf " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 46/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mman testcases " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 47/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 48/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare object blit " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 49/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare igt_gem_utils " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 50/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare context selftest " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 51/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare hangcheck " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 52/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare execlists " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 53/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare mocs tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 54/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare ring submission " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 55/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare timeline tests " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 56/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare i915_request " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 57/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare memory region " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 58/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare cs engine " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 59/61] drm/i915/selftests: Prepare gtt " Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 60/61] drm/i915: Finally remove obj->mm.lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 61/61] drm/i915: Keep userpointer bindings if seqcount is unchanged Maarten Lankhorst
2020-10-12 16:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remove obj->mm.lock! (rev2) Patchwork
2020-10-12 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-10-12 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-10-12 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-12 19:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201012144706.555345-31-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox