Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 18:50:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201030165045.5000-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030165045.5000-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Give names to the SSKPD/MLTR fields, and use the
REG_GENMASK* and REG_FIELD_GET*.

Also drop the bogus non-mirrored SSKP register define.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index d8bf85db633d..249bf17bcf9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -3818,8 +3818,17 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
 #define   MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_SHIFT		0
 #define   MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_MASK		(0xff << MAD_DIMM_A_SIZE_SHIFT)
 
-/* snb MCH registers for priority tuning */
 #define MCH_SSKPD			_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5d10)
+#define   SSKPD_NEW_WM0_MASK_HSW	REG_GENMASK64(63, 56)
+#define   SSKPD_WM4_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(40, 32)
+#define   SSKPD_WM3_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(28, 20)
+#define   SSKPD_WM2_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(19, 12)
+#define   SSKPD_WM1_MASK_HSW		REG_GENMASK64(11, 4)
+#define   SSKPD_OLD_WM0_MASK_HSW	REG_GENMASK64(3, 0)
+#define   SSKPD_WM3_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(29, 24)
+#define   SSKPD_WM2_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(21, 16)
+#define   SSKPD_WM1_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
+#define   SSKPD_WM0_MASK_SNB		REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
 
 /* Clocking configuration register */
 #define CLKCFG			_MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE + 0xc00)
@@ -6496,19 +6505,9 @@ enum {
 
 /* Memory latency timer register */
 #define MLTR_ILK		_MMIO(0x11222)
-#define  MLTR_WM1_SHIFT		0
-#define  MLTR_WM2_SHIFT		8
 /* the unit of memory self-refresh latency time is 0.5us */
-#define  ILK_SRLT_MASK		0x3f
-
-
-/* the address where we get all kinds of latency value */
-#define SSKPD			_MMIO(0x5d10)
-#define SSKPD_WM_MASK		0x3f
-#define SSKPD_WM0_SHIFT		0
-#define SSKPD_WM1_SHIFT		8
-#define SSKPD_WM2_SHIFT		16
-#define SSKPD_WM3_SHIFT		24
+#define  MLTR_WM2_MASK		REG_GENMASK(13, 8)
+#define  MLTR_WM1_MASK		REG_GENMASK(5, 0)
 
 /*
  * The two pipe frame counter registers are not synchronized, so
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index d4cbc16441d7..f29fac94c935 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2933,27 +2933,27 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
 		u64 sskpd = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
 
-		wm[0] = (sskpd >> 56) & 0xFF;
+		wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_NEW_WM0_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
 		if (wm[0] == 0)
-			wm[0] = sskpd & 0xF;
-		wm[1] = (sskpd >> 4) & 0xFF;
-		wm[2] = (sskpd >> 12) & 0xFF;
-		wm[3] = (sskpd >> 20) & 0x1FF;
-		wm[4] = (sskpd >> 32) & 0x1FF;
+			wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_OLD_WM0_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
+		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM1_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
+		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM2_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
+		wm[3] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM3_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
+		wm[4] = REG_FIELD_GET64(SSKPD_WM4_MASK_HSW, sskpd);
 	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 6) {
 		u32 sskpd = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
 
-		wm[0] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM0_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
-		wm[1] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM1_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
-		wm[2] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM2_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
-		wm[3] = (sskpd >> SSKPD_WM3_SHIFT) & SSKPD_WM_MASK;
+		wm[0] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM0_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
+		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM1_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
+		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM2_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
+		wm[3] = REG_FIELD_GET(SSKPD_WM3_MASK_SNB, sskpd);
 	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 5) {
 		u32 mltr = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MLTR_ILK);
 
 		/* ILK primary LP0 latency is 700 ns */
 		wm[0] = 7;
-		wm[1] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM1_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
-		wm[2] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM2_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
+		wm[1] = REG_FIELD_GET(MLTR_WM1_MASK, mltr);
+		wm[2] = REG_FIELD_GET(MLTR_WM2_MASK, mltr);
 	} else {
 		MISSING_CASE(INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv));
 	}
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-30 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-30 16:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/10] drm/i915: ilk+ wm cleanups Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: s/USHRT_MAX/U16_MAX/ Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: Shrink ilk-bdw wm storage by using u16 Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Rename ilk watermark structs/enums Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: s/dev_priv->wm.hw/&dev_priv->wm.ilk/ Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: s/ilk_pipe_wm/ilk_wm_state/ Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: Stash away the original SSKPD latency values Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: Remove gen6_check_mch_setup() Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Add REG_GENMASK64() and REG_FIELD_GET64() Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 16:50 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2020-10-30 20:52   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Clean up SSKPD/MLTR defines kernel test robot
2020-11-15 10:54   ` kernel test robot
2020-10-30 16:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Polish ilk+ wm regidster bits Ville Syrjala
2020-10-30 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: ilk+ wm cleanups Patchwork
2020-10-30 18:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-10-30 18:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2020-10-30 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201030165045.5000-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox