Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: jason.ekstrand@intel.com, daniel.vetter@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 21/97] drm/i915/guc: Update MMIO based communication
Date: Thu,  6 May 2021 12:13:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506191451.77768-22-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506191451.77768-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

The MMIO based Host-to-GuC communication protocol has been
updated to use unified HXG messages.

Update our intel_guc_send_mmio() function by correctly handle
BUSY, RETRY and FAILURE replies. Also update our documentation.

GuC: 55.0.0
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
---
 .../gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_mmio_abi.h    | 47 ++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c        | 75 ++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_mmio_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_mmio_abi.h
index be066a62e9e0..fef51499386b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_mmio_abi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_mmio_abi.h
@@ -7,44 +7,27 @@
 #define _ABI_GUC_COMMUNICATION_MMIO_ABI_H
 
 /**
- * DOC: MMIO based communication
+ * DOC: GuC MMIO based communication
  *
- * The MMIO based communication between Host and GuC uses software scratch
- * registers, where first register holds data treated as message header,
- * and other registers are used to hold message payload.
+ * The MMIO based communication between Host and GuC relies on special
+ * hardware registers which format could be defined by the software
+ * (so called scratch registers).
  *
- * For Gen9+, GuC uses software scratch registers 0xC180-0xC1B8,
- * but no H2G command takes more than 8 parameters and the GuC FW
- * itself uses an 8-element array to store the H2G message.
- *
- *      +-----------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |  MMIO[0]  | MMIO[1] |   ...   | MMIO[n] |
- *      +-----------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      | header    |      optional payload       |
- *      +======+====+=========+=========+=========+
- *      | 31:28|type|         |         |         |
- *      +------+----+         |         |         |
- *      | 27:16|data|         |         |         |
- *      +------+----+         |         |         |
- *      |  15:0|code|         |         |         |
- *      +------+----+---------+---------+---------+
+ * Each MMIO based message, both Host to GuC (H2G) and GuC to Host (G2H)
+ * messages, which maximum length depends on number of available scratch
+ * registers, is directly written into those scratch registers.
  *
- * The message header consists of:
- *
- * - **type**, indicates message type
- * - **code**, indicates message code, is specific for **type**
- * - **data**, indicates message data, optional, depends on **code**
+ * For Gen9+, there are 16 software scratch registers 0xC180-0xC1B8,
+ * but no H2G command takes more than 8 parameters and the GuC firmware
+ * itself uses an 8-element array to store the H2G message.
  *
- * The following message **types** are supported:
+ * For Gen11+, there are additional 4 registers 0x190240-0x19024C, which
+ * are, regardless on lower count, preffered over legacy ones.
  *
- * - **REQUEST**, indicates Host-to-GuC request, requested GuC action code
- *   must be priovided in **code** field. Optional action specific parameters
- *   can be provided in remaining payload registers or **data** field.
+ * The MMIO based communication is mainly used during driver initialization
+ * phase to setup the CTB based communication that will be used afterwards.
  *
- * - **RESPONSE**, indicates GuC-to-Host response from earlier GuC request,
- *   action response status will be provided in **code** field. Optional
- *   response data can be returned in remaining payload registers or **data**
- *   field.
+ * Format of the MMIO messages follows definitions of `HXG Message`_.
  */
 
 #define GUC_MAX_MMIO_MSG_LEN		8
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
index ab2c8fe8cdfa..454c8d886499 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c
@@ -385,29 +385,27 @@ void intel_guc_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
 /*
  * This function implements the MMIO based host to GuC interface.
  */
-int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
+int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *request, u32 len,
 			u32 *response_buf, u32 response_buf_size)
 {
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = guc_to_gt(guc)->i915;
 	struct intel_uncore *uncore = guc_to_gt(guc)->uncore;
-	u32 status;
+	u32 header;
 	int i;
 	int ret;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!len);
 	GEM_BUG_ON(len > guc->send_regs.count);
 
-	/* We expect only action code */
-	GEM_BUG_ON(*action & ~INTEL_GUC_MSG_CODE_MASK);
-
-	/* If CT is available, we expect to use MMIO only during init/fini */
-	GEM_BUG_ON(*action != INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER &&
-		   *action != INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, request[0]) != GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_HOST);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, request[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST);
 
 	mutex_lock(&guc->send_mutex);
 	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(uncore, guc->send_regs.fw_domains);
 
+retry:
 	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
-		intel_uncore_write(uncore, guc_send_reg(guc, i), action[i]);
+		intel_uncore_write(uncore, guc_send_reg(guc, i), request[i]);
 
 	intel_uncore_posting_read(uncore, guc_send_reg(guc, i - 1));
 
@@ -419,17 +417,54 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
 	 */
 	ret = __intel_wait_for_register_fw(uncore,
 					   guc_send_reg(guc, 0),
-					   INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_MASK,
-					   INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_RESPONSE <<
-					   INTEL_GUC_MSG_TYPE_SHIFT,
-					   10, 10, &status);
-	/* If GuC explicitly returned an error, convert it to -EIO */
-	if (!ret && !INTEL_GUC_MSG_IS_RESPONSE_SUCCESS(status))
-		ret = -EIO;
+					   GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN,
+					   FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN,
+						      GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC),
+					   10, 10, &header);
+	if (unlikely(ret)) {
+timeout:
+		drm_err(&i915->drm, "mmio request %#x: no reply %x\n",
+			request[0], header);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
-	if (ret) {
-		DRM_ERROR("MMIO: GuC action %#x failed with error %d %#x\n",
-			  action[0], ret, status);
+	if (FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, header) == GUC_HXG_TYPE_NO_RESPONSE_BUSY) {
+#define done ({ header = intel_uncore_read(uncore, guc_send_reg(guc, 0)); \
+		FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, header) != GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC || \
+		FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, header) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_NO_RESPONSE_BUSY; })
+
+		ret = wait_for(done, 1000);
+		if (unlikely(ret))
+			goto timeout;
+		if (unlikely(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, header) !=
+				       GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC))
+			goto proto;
+#undef done
+	}
+
+	if (FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, header) == GUC_HXG_TYPE_NO_RESPONSE_RETRY) {
+		u32 reason = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_RETRY_MSG_0_REASON, header);
+
+		drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "mmio request %#x: retrying, reason %u\n",
+			request[0], reason);
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
+	if (FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, header) == GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_FAILURE) {
+		u32 hint = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_FAILURE_MSG_0_HINT, header);
+		u32 error = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_FAILURE_MSG_0_ERROR, header);
+
+		drm_err(&i915->drm, "mmio request %#x: failure %x/%u\n",
+			request[0], error, hint);
+		ret = -ENXIO;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, header) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS) {
+proto:
+		drm_err(&i915->drm, "mmio request %#x: unexpected reply %#x\n",
+			request[0], header);
+		ret = -EPROTO;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -442,7 +477,7 @@ int intel_guc_send_mmio(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len,
 	}
 
 	/* Use data from the GuC response as our return value */
-	ret = INTEL_GUC_MSG_TO_DATA(status);
+	ret = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_RESPONSE_MSG_0_DATA0, header);
 
 out:
 	intel_uncore_forcewake_put(uncore, guc->send_regs.fw_domains);
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-06 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 251+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06 19:13 [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 01/97] drm/i915/gt: Move engine setup out of set_default_submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  0:25   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 02/97] drm/i915/gt: Move submission_method into intel_gt Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  3:10   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 03/97] drm/i915/gt: Move CS interrupt handler to the backend Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  3:31   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 04/97] drm/i915/guc: skip disabling CTBs before sanitizing the GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-20 16:47   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 05/97] drm/i915/guc: use probe_error log for CT enablement failure Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:30   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 06/97] drm/i915/guc: enable only the user interrupt when using GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:31   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 07/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove sample_forcewake h2g action Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:48   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25  0:36   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 08/97] drm/i915/guc: Keep strict GuC ABI definitions Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 23:52   ` Michał Winiarski
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 09/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using fence/status from CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:38   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 10/97] drm/i915: Promote ptrdiff() to i915_utils.h Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:42   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 11/97] drm/i915/guc: Only rely on own CTB size Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:47   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 12:48     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 12/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't repeat CTB layout calculations Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:53   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 13:07     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:56       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 13/97] drm/i915/guc: Replace CTB array with explicit members Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 14/97] drm/i915/guc: Update sizes of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:56   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 15/97] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:08   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:37     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 16/97] drm/i915/guc: Start protecting access to CTB descriptors Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:21   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 13:10     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25  3:21   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 17/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using mutex while sending CTB messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:14   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 18/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't receive all G2H messages in irq handler Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:43     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 19/97] drm/i915/guc: Always copy CT message to new allocation Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:25   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 20/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce unified HXG messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 22:11     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-12  8:40       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:13 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 22/97] drm/i915/guc: Update CTB response status Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 23/97] drm/i915/guc: Support per context scheduling policies Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  1:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 24/97] drm/i915/guc: Add flag for mark broken CTB Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 19:44   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 25/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 26/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB registration action Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 27/97] drm/i915/guc: New CTB based communication Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 28/97] drm/i915/guc: Kill guc_clients.ct_pool Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  1:01   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 29/97] drm/i915/guc: Update firmware to v60.1.2 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 30/97] drm/i915/uc: turn on GuC/HuC auto mode by default Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:00   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 31/97] drm/i915/guc: Early initialization of GuC send registers Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:28   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 32/97] drm/i915: Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:56     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 33/97] drm/i915: Engine relative MMIO Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 34/97] drm/i915/guc: Use guc_class instead of engine_class in fw interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:41   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 35/97] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:59   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 36/97] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:21   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:21   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:21     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  8:57       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:10         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 10:02           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:35             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 15:11               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-07 17:31                 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-08  8:39                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-08  8:46                     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 23:10                       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-10 15:27                         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 16:38                           ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:25                             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 13:58                     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:05                       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-09 14:14                   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:13                     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 37/97] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:58   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:35     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 14:15       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:54         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 38/97] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:31   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:39     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 39/97] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:43   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:40     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:24   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:15     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:30       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:20         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 40/97] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:45   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 41/97] drm/i915/guc: Add new GuC interface defines and structures Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 42/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove GuC stage descriptor, add lrc descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 43/97] drm/i915/guc: Add lrc descriptor context lookup array Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:26   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:01     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:43       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 19:34         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 44/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:43   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:10     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 45/97] drm/i915/guc: Add bypass tasklet submission path to GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 46/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface Matthew Brost
2021-05-29 20:32   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 47/97] drm/i915/guc: Insert fence on context when deregistering Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 48/97] drm/i915/guc: Defer context unpin until scheduling is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 49/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable engine barriers with GuC during unpin Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 16:31     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 10:26   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 50/97] drm/i915/guc: Extend deregistration fence to schedule disable Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 51/97] drm/i915: Disable preempt busywait when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 52/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure request ordering via completion fences Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 53/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable semaphores when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:52   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:01     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:25       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:15         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27  8:41           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:38             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 54/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 55/97] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:07     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:21       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:18         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27  9:02           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:37             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 56/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC debugfs to support new GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 57/97] drm/i915/guc: Add several request trace points Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 58/97] drm/i915: Add intel_context tracing Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 59/97] drm/i915/guc: GuC virtual engines Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 60/97] drm/i915: Track 'serial' counts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:16   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:52     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  8:40       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:45         ` John Harrison
2021-05-27  8:53           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 17:01             ` John Harrison
2021-06-01  9:31               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02  1:20                 ` John Harrison
2021-06-02 12:04                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 12:09   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 61/97] drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_context over life of i915_request Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 12:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 62/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable bonding extension with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 63/97] drm/i915/guc: Direct all breadcrumbs for a class to single breadcrumbs Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 13:31   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:33   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-04  3:17     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-04  8:16       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-04 18:02         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 65/97] drm/i915: Reset GPU immediately if submission is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 66/97] drm/i915/guc: Add disable interrupts to guc sanitize Matthew Brost
2021-05-11  8:16   ` [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/guc] 07336fb545: WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c:#__uc_sanitize[i915] kernel test robot
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 67/97] drm/i915/guc: Suspend/resume implementation for new interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 68/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle context reset notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:25   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 69/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle engine reset failure notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 70/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable the timer expired interrupt for GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 71/97] drm/i915/guc: Provide mmio list to be saved/restored on engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 72/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't complain about reset races Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 73/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 74/97] drm/i915/guc: Capture error state on context reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:12     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:45       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 75/97] drm/i915/guc: Fix for error capture after full GPU reset with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 76/97] drm/i915/guc: Hook GuC scheduling policies up Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 77/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 78/97] drm/i915/guc: Include scheduling policies in the debugfs state dump Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 79/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call ring_is_idle in GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 80/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement banned contexts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 81/97] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 82/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 83/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't return -EAGAIN to user when guc_ids exhausted Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 84/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't allow requests not ready to consume all guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 85/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_submit_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 86/97] drm/i915/guc: Add golden context to GuC ADS Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 87/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC priority management Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 88/97] drm/i915/guc: Support request cancellation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 89/97] drm/i915/guc: Check return of __xa_store when registering a context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 90/97] drm/i915/guc: Non-static lrc descriptor registration buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 91/97] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 92/97] drm/i915: Add GT PM delayed worker Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 93/97] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 94/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 95/97] drm/i915/guc: Selftest for GuC flow control Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 96/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC documentation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 97/97] drm/i915/guc: Unblock GuC submission on Gen11+ Matthew Brost
2021-05-09 17:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Martin Peres
2021-05-09 23:11   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-10 13:55     ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:25       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-11  8:01         ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:33       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-10 18:30         ` Francisco Jerez
2021-05-11  8:06         ` Martin Peres
2021-05-11 15:26           ` Bloomfield, Jon
2021-05-11 16:39             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-12  6:26               ` Martin Peres
2021-05-14 16:31                 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-25 15:37                   ` Alex Deucher
2021-05-11  2:58     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-05-11  7:47       ` Martin Peres
2021-05-14 11:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 16:36   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-14 16:46     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-14 16:41   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 16:45   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 15:27     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 18:57       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03  3:41         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03  4:47           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03  9:49             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 10:52           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03  4:10       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03  8:51         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 16:34           ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210506191451.77768-22-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jason.ekstrand@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox