public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: jason.ekstrand@intel.com, daniel.vetter@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 27/97] drm/i915/guc: New CTB based communication
Date: Thu,  6 May 2021 12:13:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210506191451.77768-28-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506191451.77768-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

Format of the CTB messages has changed:
 - support for multiple formats
 - message fence is now part of the header
 - reuse of unified HXG message formats

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
---
 .../gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h     |  56 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c     | 193 +++++++-----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h     |   2 +-
 3 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
index 127b256a662c..92660726c094 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_communication_ctb_abi.h
@@ -60,6 +60,62 @@ struct guc_ct_buffer_desc {
 } __packed;
 static_assert(sizeof(struct guc_ct_buffer_desc) == 64);
 
+/**
+ * DOC: CTB Message
+ *
+ *  +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  |   | Bits  | Description                                                  |
+ *  +===+=======+==============================================================+
+ *  | 0 | 31:16 | **FENCE** - message identifier                               |
+ *  |   +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  |   | 15:12 | **FORMAT** - format of the CTB message                       |
+ *  |   |       |  - _`GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG` = 0 - see `CTB HXG Message`_        |
+ *  |   +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  |   |  11:8 | **RESERVED**                                                 |
+ *  |   +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  |   |   7:0 | **NUM_DWORDS** - length of the CTB message (w/o header)      |
+ *  +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  | 1 |  31:0 | optional (depends on FORMAT)                                 |
+ *  +---+-------+                                                              |
+ *  |...|       |                                                              |
+ *  +---+-------+                                                              |
+ *  | n |  31:0 |                                                              |
+ *  +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ */
+
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN			1u
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN			256u
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE			(0xffff << 16)
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FORMAT			(0xf << 12)
+#define   GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG			0u
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_RESERVED			(0xf << 8)
+#define GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS		(0xff << 0)
+
+/**
+ * DOC: CTB HXG Message
+ *
+ *  +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  |   | Bits  | Description                                                  |
+ *  +===+=======+==============================================================+
+ *  | 0 | 31:16 | FENCE                                                        |
+ *  |   +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  |   | 15:12 | FORMAT = GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG_                                 |
+ *  |   +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  |   |  11:8 | RESERVED = MBZ                                               |
+ *  |   +-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  |   |   7:0 | NUM_DWORDS = length (in dwords) of the embedded HXG message  |
+ *  +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ *  | 1 |  31:0 |  +--------------------------------------------------------+  |
+ *  +---+-------+  |                                                        |  |
+ *  |...|       |  |  Embedded `HXG Message`_                               |  |
+ *  +---+-------+  |                                                        |  |
+ *  | n |  31:0 |  +--------------------------------------------------------+  |
+ *  +---+-------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ */
+
+#define GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN		(GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN + GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN)
+#define GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MAX_LEN		GUC_CTB_MSG_MAX_LEN
+
 /**
  * DOC: CTB based communication
  *
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
index e25b49a45107..217ab3ebd1af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c
@@ -343,24 +343,6 @@ static u32 ct_get_next_fence(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
 	return ++ct->requests.last_fence;
 }
 
-/**
- * DOC: CTB Host to GuC request
- *
- * Format of the CTB Host to GuC request message is as follows::
- *
- *      +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |   msg[0]   |   [1]   |   [2]   |   ...   |  [n-1]  |
- *      +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |   MESSAGE  |       MESSAGE PAYLOAD                 |
- *      +   HEADER   +---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |            |    0    |    1    |   ...   |    n    |
- *      +============+=========+=========+=========+=========+
- *      |  len >= 1  |  FENCE  |     request specific data   |
- *      +------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *
- *                   ^-----------------len-------------------^
- */
-
 static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
 		    const u32 *action,
 		    u32 len /* in dwords */,
@@ -373,6 +355,7 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
 	u32 size = ctb->size;
 	u32 used;
 	u32 header;
+	u32 hxg;
 	u32 *cmds = ctb->cmds;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -403,22 +386,24 @@ static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
 		return -ENOSPC;
 
 	/*
-	 * Write the message. The format is the following:
-	 * DW0: header (including action code)
-	 * DW1: fence
-	 * DW2+: action data
+	 * dw0: CT header (including fence)
+	 * dw1: HXG header
 	 */
-	header = (len << GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_SHIFT) |
-		 GUC_CT_MSG_SEND_STATUS |
-		 (action[0] << GUC_CT_MSG_ACTION_SHIFT);
+	header = FIELD_PREP(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FORMAT, GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG) |
+		 FIELD_PREP(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS, len) |
+		 FIELD_PREP(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE, fence);
+
+	hxg = FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_REQUEST) |
+	      FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_ACTION |
+			 GUC_HXG_REQUEST_MSG_0_DATA0, action[0]);
 
-	CT_DEBUG(ct, "writing %*ph %*ph %*ph\n",
-		 4, &header, 4, &fence, 4 * (len - 1), &action[1]);
+	CT_DEBUG(ct, "writing (tail %u) %*ph %*ph %*ph\n",
+		 tail, 4, &header, 4, &hxg, 4 * (len - 1), &action[1]);
 
 	cmds[tail] = header;
 	tail = (tail + 1) % size;
 
-	cmds[tail] = fence;
+	cmds[tail] = hxg;
 	tail = (tail + 1) % size;
 
 	for (i = 1; i < len; i++) {
@@ -574,21 +559,6 @@ int intel_guc_ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static inline unsigned int ct_header_get_len(u32 header)
-{
-	return (header >> GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_SHIFT) & GUC_CT_MSG_LEN_MASK;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int ct_header_get_action(u32 header)
-{
-	return (header >> GUC_CT_MSG_ACTION_SHIFT) & GUC_CT_MSG_ACTION_MASK;
-}
-
-static inline bool ct_header_is_response(u32 header)
-{
-	return !!(header & GUC_CT_MSG_IS_RESPONSE);
-}
-
 static struct ct_incoming_msg *ct_alloc_msg(u32 num_dwords)
 {
 	struct ct_incoming_msg *msg;
@@ -651,7 +621,7 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
 	head = (head + 1) % size;
 
 	/* message len with header */
-	len = ct_header_get_len(header) + 1;
+	len = FIELD_GET(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS, header) + GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN;
 	if (unlikely(len > (u32)available)) {
 		CT_ERROR(ct, "Incomplete message %*ph %*ph %*ph\n",
 			 4, &header,
@@ -694,55 +664,24 @@ static int ct_read(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg **msg)
 	return -EPIPE;
 }
 
-/**
- * DOC: CTB GuC to Host response
- *
- * Format of the CTB GuC to Host response message is as follows::
- *
- *      +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |   msg[0]   |   [1]   |   [2]   |   [3]   |   ...   |  [n-1]  |
- *      +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |   MESSAGE  |       MESSAGE PAYLOAD                           |
- *      +   HEADER   +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |            |    0    |    1    |    2    |   ...   |    n    |
- *      +============+=========+=========+=========+=========+=========+
- *      |  len >= 2  |  FENCE  |  STATUS |   response specific data    |
- *      +------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *
- *                   ^-----------------------len-----------------------^
- */
-
 static int ct_handle_response(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *response)
 {
-	u32 header = response->msg[0];
-	u32 len = ct_header_get_len(header);
-	u32 fence;
-	u32 status;
-	u32 datalen;
+	u32 len = FIELD_GET(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_NUM_DWORDS, response->msg[0]);
+	u32 fence = FIELD_GET(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FENCE, response->msg[0]);
+	const u32 *hxg = &response->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+	const u32 *data = &hxg[GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+	u32 datalen = len - GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN;
 	struct ct_request *req;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool found = false;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!ct_header_is_response(header));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(len < GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS &&
+		   FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_FAILURE);
 
-	/* Response payload shall at least include fence and status */
-	if (unlikely(len < 2)) {
-		CT_ERROR(ct, "Corrupted response (len %u)\n", len);
-		return -EPROTO;
-	}
-
-	fence = response->msg[1];
-	status = response->msg[2];
-	datalen = len - 2;
-
-	/* Format of the status dword follows HXG header */
-	if (unlikely(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, status) != GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC)) {
-		CT_ERROR(ct, "Corrupted response (status %#x)\n", status);
-		return -EPROTO;
-	}
-
-	CT_DEBUG(ct, "response fence %u status %#x\n", fence, status);
+	CT_DEBUG(ct, "response fence %u status %#x\n", fence, hxg[0]);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
 	list_for_each_entry(req, &ct->requests.pending, link) {
@@ -758,9 +697,9 @@ static int ct_handle_response(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *r
 			err = -EMSGSIZE;
 		}
 		if (datalen)
-			memcpy(req->response_buf, response->msg + 3, 4 * datalen);
+			memcpy(req->response_buf, data, 4 * datalen);
 		req->response_len = datalen;
-		WRITE_ONCE(req->status, status);
+		WRITE_ONCE(req->status, hxg[0]);
 		found = true;
 		break;
 	}
@@ -781,14 +720,15 @@ static int ct_handle_response(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *r
 static int ct_process_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *request)
 {
 	struct intel_guc *guc = ct_to_guc(ct);
-	u32 header, action, len;
+	const u32 *hxg;
 	const u32 *payload;
+	u32 action, len;
 	int ret;
 
-	header = request->msg[0];
-	payload = &request->msg[1];
-	action = ct_header_get_action(header);
-	len = ct_header_get_len(header);
+	hxg = &request->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+	payload = &hxg[GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+	action = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_EVENT_MSG_0_ACTION, hxg[0]);
+	len = request->size - GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN;
 
 	CT_DEBUG(ct, "request %x %*ph\n", action, 4 * len, payload);
 
@@ -850,29 +790,12 @@ static void ct_incoming_request_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
 		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &ct->requests.worker);
 }
 
-/**
- * DOC: CTB GuC to Host request
- *
- * Format of the CTB GuC to Host request message is as follows::
- *
- *      +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |   msg[0]   |   [1]   |   [2]   |   [3]   |   ...   |  [n-1]  |
- *      +------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |   MESSAGE  |       MESSAGE PAYLOAD                           |
- *      +   HEADER   +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *      |            |    0    |    1    |    2    |   ...   |    n    |
- *      +============+=========+=========+=========+=========+=========+
- *      |     len    |            request specific data                |
- *      +------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
- *
- *                   ^-----------------------len-----------------------^
- */
-
-static int ct_handle_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *request)
+static int ct_handle_event(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *request)
 {
+	const u32 *hxg = &request->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(ct_header_is_response(request->msg[0]));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
 	list_add_tail(&request->link, &ct->requests.incoming);
@@ -882,15 +805,53 @@ static int ct_handle_request(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *re
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void ct_handle_msg(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *msg)
+static int ct_handle_hxg(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *msg)
 {
-	u32 header = msg->msg[0];
+	u32 origin, type;
+	u32 *hxg;
 	int err;
 
-	if (ct_header_is_response(header))
+	if (unlikely(msg->size < GUC_CTB_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN))
+		return -EBADMSG;
+
+	hxg = &msg->msg[GUC_CTB_MSG_MIN_LEN];
+
+	origin = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, hxg[0]);
+	if (unlikely(origin != GUC_HXG_ORIGIN_GUC)) {
+		err = -EPROTO;
+		goto failed;
+	}
+
+	type = FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, hxg[0]);
+	switch (type) {
+	case GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT:
+		err = ct_handle_event(ct, msg);
+		break;
+	case GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS:
+	case GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_FAILURE:
 		err = ct_handle_response(ct, msg);
+		break;
+	default:
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (unlikely(err)) {
+failed:
+		CT_ERROR(ct, "Failed to handle HXG message (%pe) %*ph\n",
+			 ERR_PTR(err), 4 * GUC_HXG_MSG_MIN_LEN, hxg);
+	}
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void ct_handle_msg(struct intel_guc_ct *ct, struct ct_incoming_msg *msg)
+{
+	u32 format = FIELD_GET(GUC_CTB_MSG_0_FORMAT, msg->msg[0]);
+	int err;
+
+	if (format == GUC_CTB_FORMAT_HXG)
+		err = ct_handle_hxg(ct, msg);
 	else
-		err = ct_handle_request(ct, msg);
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	if (unlikely(err)) {
 		CT_ERROR(ct, "Failed to process CT message (%pe) %*ph\n",
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
index 905202caaad3..1ae2dde6db93 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct intel_guc_ct {
 	struct tasklet_struct receive_tasklet;
 
 	struct {
-		u32 last_fence; /* last fence used to send request */
+		u16 last_fence; /* last fence used to send request */
 
 		spinlock_t lock; /* protects pending requests list */
 		struct list_head pending; /* requests waiting for response */
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-06 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 251+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06 19:13 [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 01/97] drm/i915/gt: Move engine setup out of set_default_submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  0:25   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 02/97] drm/i915/gt: Move submission_method into intel_gt Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  3:10   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 03/97] drm/i915/gt: Move CS interrupt handler to the backend Matthew Brost
2021-05-19  3:31   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  8:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 04/97] drm/i915/guc: skip disabling CTBs before sanitizing the GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-20 16:47   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 05/97] drm/i915/guc: use probe_error log for CT enablement failure Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:30   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 06/97] drm/i915/guc: enable only the user interrupt when using GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:31   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 07/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove sample_forcewake h2g action Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 10:48   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25  0:36   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 08/97] drm/i915/guc: Keep strict GuC ABI definitions Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 23:52   ` Michał Winiarski
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 09/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using fence/status from CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:38   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 10/97] drm/i915: Promote ptrdiff() to i915_utils.h Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  0:42   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 11/97] drm/i915/guc: Only rely on own CTB size Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:47   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 12:48     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 12/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't repeat CTB layout calculations Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:53   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 13:07     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:56       ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 13/97] drm/i915/guc: Replace CTB array with explicit members Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 14/97] drm/i915/guc: Update sizes of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  2:56   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 15/97] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:08   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:37     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 16/97] drm/i915/guc: Start protecting access to CTB descriptors Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  3:21   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 13:10     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25  3:21   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 17/97] drm/i915/guc: Stop using mutex while sending CTB messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 16:14   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 18/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't receive all G2H messages in irq handler Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 19:43     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 19/97] drm/i915/guc: Always copy CT message to new allocation Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 18:25   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 20/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce unified HXG messages Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 22:11     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-12  8:40       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 21/97] drm/i915/guc: Update MMIO based communication Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 22/97] drm/i915/guc: Update CTB response status Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 23/97] drm/i915/guc: Support per context scheduling policies Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  1:15   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 24/97] drm/i915/guc: Add flag for mark broken CTB Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 19:44   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 25/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 26/97] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB registration action Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 28/97] drm/i915/guc: Kill guc_clients.ct_pool Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  1:01   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 29/97] drm/i915/guc: Update firmware to v60.1.2 Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 30/97] drm/i915/uc: turn on GuC/HuC auto mode by default Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:00   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 31/97] drm/i915/guc: Early initialization of GuC send registers Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:28   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 32/97] drm/i915: Introduce i915_sched_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:18   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:56     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 33/97] drm/i915: Engine relative MMIO Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:05   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 34/97] drm/i915/guc: Use guc_class instead of engine_class in fw interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 20:41   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 35/97] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 11:59   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 36/97] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:21   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:21   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:21     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  8:57       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:10         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 10:02           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:35             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27 15:11               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-07 17:31                 ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-08  8:39                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-08  8:46                     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 23:10                       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-10 15:27                         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 16:38                           ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:25                             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-09 13:58                     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:05                       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-09 14:14                   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-09 23:13                     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 37/97] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 12:58   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:35     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 14:15       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 16:54         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 38/97] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:31   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-25 17:39     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 39/97] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:43   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-24 18:40     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:24   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:15     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:30       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:20         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 40/97] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-05-24 13:45   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 41/97] drm/i915/guc: Add new GuC interface defines and structures Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 42/97] drm/i915/guc: Remove GuC stage descriptor, add lrc descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 43/97] drm/i915/guc: Add lrc descriptor context lookup array Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:26   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:01     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:43       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 19:34         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 44/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:43   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:10     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 45/97] drm/i915/guc: Add bypass tasklet submission path to GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 46/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface Matthew Brost
2021-05-29 20:32   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 47/97] drm/i915/guc: Insert fence on context when deregistering Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 48/97] drm/i915/guc: Defer context unpin until scheduling is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 49/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable engine barriers with GuC during unpin Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 15:37   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 16:31     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26 10:26   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 50/97] drm/i915/guc: Extend deregistration fence to schedule disable Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 51/97] drm/i915: Disable preempt busywait when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 52/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure request ordering via completion fences Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 53/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable semaphores when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-05-25  9:52   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:01     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:25       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:15         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27  8:41           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:38             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 54/97] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 55/97] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:07     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  9:21       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:18         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-27  9:02           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 14:37             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 56/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC debugfs to support new GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 57/97] drm/i915/guc: Add several request trace points Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 58/97] drm/i915: Add intel_context tracing Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 59/97] drm/i915/guc: GuC virtual engines Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 60/97] drm/i915: Track 'serial' counts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:16   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 17:52     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-26  8:40       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-26 18:45         ` John Harrison
2021-05-27  8:53           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-27 17:01             ` John Harrison
2021-06-01  9:31               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02  1:20                 ` John Harrison
2021-06-02 12:04                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 12:09   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 61/97] drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_context over life of i915_request Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 12:18   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 62/97] drm/i915/guc: Disable bonding extension with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 63/97] drm/i915/guc: Direct all breadcrumbs for a class to single breadcrumbs Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 13:31   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 64/97] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:33   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-04  3:17     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-04  8:16       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-04 18:02         ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 65/97] drm/i915: Reset GPU immediately if submission is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 14:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 66/97] drm/i915/guc: Add disable interrupts to guc sanitize Matthew Brost
2021-05-11  8:16   ` [Intel-gfx] [drm/i915/guc] 07336fb545: WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c:#__uc_sanitize[i915] kernel test robot
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 67/97] drm/i915/guc: Suspend/resume implementation for new interface Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 68/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle context reset notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:25   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 69/97] drm/i915/guc: Handle engine reset failure notification Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 70/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable the timer expired interrupt for GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 71/97] drm/i915/guc: Provide mmio list to be saved/restored on engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 72/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't complain about reset races Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 73/97] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 74/97] drm/i915/guc: Capture error state on context reset Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 16:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-11 17:12     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-11 17:45       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 75/97] drm/i915/guc: Fix for error capture after full GPU reset with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 76/97] drm/i915/guc: Hook GuC scheduling policies up Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 77/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 78/97] drm/i915/guc: Include scheduling policies in the debugfs state dump Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 79/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call ring_is_idle in GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 80/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement banned contexts for " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 81/97] drm/i915/guc: Allow flexible number of context ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 82/97] drm/i915/guc: Connect the number of guc_ids to debugfs Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 83/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't return -EAGAIN to user when guc_ids exhausted Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 84/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't allow requests not ready to consume all guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 85/97] drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_submit_engine object Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 86/97] drm/i915/guc: Add golden context to GuC ADS Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 87/97] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC priority management Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 88/97] drm/i915/guc: Support request cancellation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 89/97] drm/i915/guc: Check return of __xa_store when registering a context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 90/97] drm/i915/guc: Non-static lrc descriptor registration buffer Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 91/97] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 92/97] drm/i915: Add GT PM delayed worker Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 93/97] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 94/97] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 95/97] drm/i915/guc: Selftest for GuC flow control Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 96/97] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC documentation Matthew Brost
2021-05-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 97/97] drm/i915/guc: Unblock GuC submission on Gen11+ Matthew Brost
2021-05-09 17:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH 00/97] Basic GuC submission support in the i915 Martin Peres
2021-05-09 23:11   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-10 13:55     ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:25       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-11  8:01         ` Martin Peres
2021-05-10 16:33       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-05-10 18:30         ` Francisco Jerez
2021-05-11  8:06         ` Martin Peres
2021-05-11 15:26           ` Bloomfield, Jon
2021-05-11 16:39             ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-12  6:26               ` Martin Peres
2021-05-14 16:31                 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-25 15:37                   ` Alex Deucher
2021-05-11  2:58     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-05-11  7:47       ` Martin Peres
2021-05-14 11:11 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-14 16:36   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-05-14 16:46     ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-14 16:41   ` Matthew Brost
2021-05-25 10:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-05-25 16:45   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-02 15:27     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-02 18:57       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03  3:41         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03  4:47           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-03  9:49             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 10:52           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03  4:10       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-03  8:51         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-03 16:34           ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210506191451.77768-28-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jason.ekstrand@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox