[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Matt Roper]

Our uncore MMIO functions for reading/writing registers have become very
complicated over time.  There's significant macro magic used to generate
several nearly-identical functions that only really differ in terms of
which platform-specific shadow register table they should check on write
operations.  We can significantly simplify our MMIO handlers by storing
a reference to the current platform's shadow table within the 'struct
intel_uncore' the same way we already do for forcewake; this allows us
to consolidate the multiple variants of each 'write' function down to
just a single 'fwtable' version that gets the shadow table out of the
uncore struct rather than hardcoding the name of a specific platform's
table.  We can do similar consolidation on the MMIO read side by
creating a single-entry forcewake table to replace the open-coded range
check they had been using previously.

The final patch of the series adds a new shadow table for DG2; this
becomes quite clean and simple now, given the refactoring in the first
five patches.

Matt Roper (6):
  drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable
  drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore
  drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable
  drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
  drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers
  drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c           | 190 ++++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h           |   7 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c |   1 +
 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.4

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable

[Matt Roper]

On gen6-gen8 (except vlv/chv) we don't use a forcewake lookup table; we
simply check whether the register offset is < 0x40000, and return
FORCEWAKE_RENDER if it is.  To prepare for upcoming refactoring, let's
define a single-entry forcewake table from [0x0, 0x3ffff] and switch
these platforms over to use the fwtable reader functions.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index f9767054dbdf..7f92f12d95f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1064,6 +1064,10 @@ gen6_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
 	__fwd; \
 })
 
+static const struct intel_forcewake_range __gen6_fw_ranges[] = {
+	GEN_FW_RANGE(0x0, 0x3ffff, FORCEWAKE_RENDER),
+};
+
 /* *Must* be sorted by offset ranges! See intel_fw_table_check(). */
 static const struct intel_forcewake_range __chv_fw_ranges[] = {
 	GEN_FW_RANGE(0x2000, 0x3fff, FORCEWAKE_RENDER),
@@ -1623,7 +1627,6 @@ __gen_read(func, 64)
 
 __gen_reg_read_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
 __gen_reg_read_funcs(fwtable);
-__gen_reg_read_funcs(gen6);
 
 #undef __gen_reg_read_funcs
 #undef GEN6_READ_FOOTER
@@ -2111,15 +2114,17 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 8) {
+		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen6_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen8);
-		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
+		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __vlv_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 6, 7)) {
+		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen6_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
-		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
+		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	}
 
 	uncore->pmic_bus_access_nb.notifier_call = i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier;
-- 
2.25.4

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 10/09/2021 06:33, Matt Roper wrote:
> On gen6-gen8 (except vlv/chv) we don't use a forcewake lookup table; we
> simply check whether the register offset is < 0x40000, and return
> FORCEWAKE_RENDER if it is.  To prepare for upcoming refactoring, let's
> define a single-entry forcewake table from [0x0, 0x3ffff] and switch
> these platforms over to use the fwtable reader functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 11 ++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index f9767054dbdf..7f92f12d95f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -1064,6 +1064,10 @@ gen6_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
>   	__fwd; \
>   })
>   

Is __gen6_reg_read_fw_domains left orphaned somewhere around here or in 
a later patch?

Regards,

Tvrtko

> +static const struct intel_forcewake_range __gen6_fw_ranges[] = {
> +	GEN_FW_RANGE(0x0, 0x3ffff, FORCEWAKE_RENDER),
> +};
> +
>   /* *Must* be sorted by offset ranges! See intel_fw_table_check(). */
>   static const struct intel_forcewake_range __chv_fw_ranges[] = {
>   	GEN_FW_RANGE(0x2000, 0x3fff, FORCEWAKE_RENDER),
> @@ -1623,7 +1627,6 @@ __gen_read(func, 64)
>   
>   __gen_reg_read_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
>   __gen_reg_read_funcs(fwtable);
> -__gen_reg_read_funcs(gen6);
>   
>   #undef __gen_reg_read_funcs
>   #undef GEN6_READ_FOOTER
> @@ -2111,15 +2114,17 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>   		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 8) {
> +		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen6_fw_ranges);
>   		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen8);
> -		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
> +		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   	} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915)) {
>   		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __vlv_fw_ranges);
>   		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
>   		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   	} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 6, 7)) {
> +		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen6_fw_ranges);
>   		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
> -		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen6);
> +		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   	}
>   
>   	uncore->pmic_bus_access_nb.notifier_call = i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier;
> 

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore

[Matt Roper]

Store a reference to a platform's shadow table inside the uncore, the
same as we do with the forcewake table.  This will allow us to use a
single set of functions that operate on the shadow table reference
rather than generating lots of nearly-identical functions via macros
that differ only in terms of the table that they reference.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h |  7 +++++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 7f92f12d95f2..159880e3e77d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1036,17 +1036,19 @@ static int mmio_range_cmp(u32 key, const struct i915_range *range)
 		return 0;
 }
 
-#define __is_X_shadowed(x) \
-static bool is_##x##_shadowed(u32 offset) \
-{ \
-	const struct i915_range *regs = x##_shadowed_regs; \
-	return BSEARCH(offset, regs, ARRAY_SIZE(x##_shadowed_regs), \
+static bool
+is_shadowed(struct intel_uncore *uncore, u32 offset)
+{
+	if (drm_WARN_ON(&uncore->i915->drm, !uncore->shadowed_reg_table))
+		return false;
+
+	return BSEARCH(offset,
+		       uncore->shadowed_reg_table,
+		       uncore->shadowed_reg_table_entries,
 		       mmio_range_cmp); \
 }
 
-__is_X_shadowed(gen8)
-__is_X_shadowed(gen11)
-__is_X_shadowed(gen12)
+
 
 static enum forcewake_domains
 gen6_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
@@ -1057,7 +1059,7 @@ gen6_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
 #define __gen8_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
 ({ \
 	enum forcewake_domains __fwd; \
-	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(offset) && !is_gen8_shadowed(offset)) \
+	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(offset) && !is_shadowed(uncore, offset)) \
 		__fwd = FORCEWAKE_RENDER; \
 	else \
 		__fwd = 0; \
@@ -1091,7 +1093,7 @@ static const struct intel_forcewake_range __chv_fw_ranges[] = {
 #define __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
 ({ \
 	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
-	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((offset)) && !is_gen8_shadowed(offset)) \
+	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((offset)) && !is_shadowed(uncore, offset)) \
 		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, offset); \
 	__fwd; \
 })
@@ -1100,7 +1102,7 @@ static const struct intel_forcewake_range __chv_fw_ranges[] = {
 ({ \
 	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
 	const u32 __offset = (offset); \
-	if (!is_gen11_shadowed(__offset)) \
+	if (!is_shadowed(uncore, __offset)) \
 		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, __offset); \
 	__fwd; \
 })
@@ -1109,7 +1111,7 @@ static const struct intel_forcewake_range __chv_fw_ranges[] = {
 ({ \
 	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
 	const u32 __offset = (offset); \
-	if (!is_gen12_shadowed(__offset)) \
+	if (!is_shadowed(uncore, __offset)) \
 		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, __offset); \
 	__fwd; \
 })
@@ -1715,6 +1717,7 @@ __gen_write(func, 8) \
 __gen_write(func, 16) \
 __gen_write(func, 32)
 
+
 __gen_reg_write_funcs(gen12_fwtable);
 __gen_reg_write_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
 __gen_reg_write_funcs(fwtable);
@@ -1979,6 +1982,12 @@ static int intel_uncore_fw_domains_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 	(uncore)->fw_domains_table_entries = ARRAY_SIZE((d)); \
 }
 
+#define ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, d) \
+{ \
+	(uncore)->shadowed_reg_table = d; \
+	(uncore)->shadowed_reg_table_entries = ARRAY_SIZE((d)); \
+}
+
 static int i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
 					 unsigned long action, void *data)
 {
@@ -2091,30 +2100,37 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __dg2_fw_ranges);
+		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __xehp_fw_ranges);
+		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen12_fw_ranges);
+		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 11) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen11_fw_ranges);
+		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen11_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 9, 10)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen9_fw_ranges);
+		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen8_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __chv_fw_ranges);
+		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen8_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 8) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen6_fw_ranges);
+		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen8_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen8);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915)) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
index 531665b08039..2f31c50eeae2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h
@@ -142,6 +142,13 @@ struct intel_uncore {
 	const struct intel_forcewake_range *fw_domains_table;
 	unsigned int fw_domains_table_entries;
 
+	/*
+	 * Shadowed registers are special cases where we can safely write
+	 * to the register *without* grabbing forcewake.
+	 */
+	const struct i915_range *shadowed_reg_table;
+	unsigned int shadowed_reg_table_entries;
+
 	struct notifier_block pmic_bus_access_nb;
 	struct intel_uncore_funcs funcs;
 
-- 
2.25.4

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable

[Matt Roper]

Now that we have both a standard forcewake table (albeit a single-entry
table) and the shadow table stored in the uncore, we can drop the
gen8-specific write handlers in favor of the general fwtable version.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 159880e3e77d..80533cf24fe8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1056,16 +1056,6 @@ gen6_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
 	return FORCEWAKE_RENDER;
 }
 
-#define __gen8_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
-({ \
-	enum forcewake_domains __fwd; \
-	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE(offset) && !is_shadowed(uncore, offset)) \
-		__fwd = FORCEWAKE_RENDER; \
-	else \
-		__fwd = 0; \
-	__fwd; \
-})
-
 static const struct intel_forcewake_range __gen6_fw_ranges[] = {
 	GEN_FW_RANGE(0x0, 0x3ffff, FORCEWAKE_RENDER),
 };
@@ -1721,7 +1711,6 @@ __gen_write(func, 32)
 __gen_reg_write_funcs(gen12_fwtable);
 __gen_reg_write_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
 __gen_reg_write_funcs(fwtable);
-__gen_reg_write_funcs(gen8);
 
 #undef __gen_reg_write_funcs
 #undef GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER
@@ -2131,7 +2120,7 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 8) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen6_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen8_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen8);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __vlv_fw_ranges);
-- 
2.25.4

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers

[Matt Roper]

Now that the reference to the shadow table is stored within the uncore,
we don't need to generate separate fwtable, gen11_fwtable, and
gen12_fwtable variants of the register write functions; a single
'fwtable' implementation will work for all of those platforms now.

Note that while consolidating down to __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains()
we drop the NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check.  If an MMIO offset is outside that
range on older platforms, it also won't be part of a range in the
forcewake table, so a '0' will be returned anyway.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 54 +++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 80533cf24fe8..c181e74fbf43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1081,23 +1081,6 @@ static const struct intel_forcewake_range __chv_fw_ranges[] = {
 };
 
 #define __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
-({ \
-	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
-	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((offset)) && !is_shadowed(uncore, offset)) \
-		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, offset); \
-	__fwd; \
-})
-
-#define __gen11_fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
-({ \
-	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
-	const u32 __offset = (offset); \
-	if (!is_shadowed(uncore, __offset)) \
-		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, __offset); \
-	__fwd; \
-})
-
-#define __gen12_fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
 ({ \
 	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
 	const u32 __offset = (offset); \
@@ -1685,34 +1668,29 @@ __gen6_write(8)
 __gen6_write(16)
 __gen6_write(32)
 
-#define __gen_write(func, x) \
+#define __gen_fwtable_write(x) \
 static void \
-func##_write##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
+fwtable_write##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
 	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
 	GEN6_WRITE_HEADER; \
-	fw_engine = __##func##_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
+	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
 	if (fw_engine) \
 		__force_wake_auto(uncore, fw_engine); \
 	__raw_uncore_write##x(uncore, reg, val); \
 	GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER; \
 }
 
-#define __gen_reg_write_funcs(func) \
-static enum forcewake_domains \
-func##_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) { \
-	return __##func##_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
-} \
-\
-__gen_write(func, 8) \
-__gen_write(func, 16) \
-__gen_write(func, 32)
-
+static enum forcewake_domains
+fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg)
+{
+	return __fwtable_reg_write_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg));
+}
 
-__gen_reg_write_funcs(gen12_fwtable);
-__gen_reg_write_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
-__gen_reg_write_funcs(fwtable);
+__gen_fwtable_write(8)
+__gen_fwtable_write(16)
+__gen_fwtable_write(32)
 
-#undef __gen_reg_write_funcs
+#undef __gen_fwtable_write
 #undef GEN6_WRITE_FOOTER
 #undef GEN6_WRITE_HEADER
 
@@ -2090,22 +2068,22 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __dg2_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __xehp_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen12_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen12_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 11) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen11_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen11_shadowed_regs);
-		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 9, 10)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen9_fw_ranges);
-- 
2.25.4

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers

[Matt Roper]

Consolidate down to just a single 'fwtable' implementation.  For reads
we don't need to worry about shadow tables.  Also, the
NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check we previously had in the fwtable implementation
can be dropped --- if a register is outside that range on one of the old
platforms, then it won't belong to any forcewake range and 0 will be
returned anyway.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 45 +++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index c181e74fbf43..95398cb69722 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -935,14 +935,6 @@ static const struct intel_forcewake_range __vlv_fw_ranges[] = {
 };
 
 #define __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
-({ \
-	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
-	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((offset))) \
-		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, offset); \
-	__fwd; \
-})
-
-#define __gen11_fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
 	find_fw_domain(uncore, offset)
 
 /* *Must* be sorted by offset! See intel_shadow_table_check(). */
@@ -1577,33 +1569,30 @@ static inline void __force_wake_auto(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
 		___force_wake_auto(uncore, fw_domains);
 }
 
-#define __gen_read(func, x) \
+#define __gen_fwtable_read(x) \
 static u##x \
-func##_read##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) { \
+fwtable_read##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) \
+{ \
 	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
 	GEN6_READ_HEADER(x); \
-	fw_engine = __##func##_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
+	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
 	if (fw_engine) \
 		__force_wake_auto(uncore, fw_engine); \
 	val = __raw_uncore_read##x(uncore, reg); \
 	GEN6_READ_FOOTER; \
 }
 
-#define __gen_reg_read_funcs(func) \
-static enum forcewake_domains \
-func##_reg_read_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) { \
-	return __##func##_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
-} \
-\
-__gen_read(func, 8) \
-__gen_read(func, 16) \
-__gen_read(func, 32) \
-__gen_read(func, 64)
+static enum forcewake_domains
+fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) {
+	return __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg));
+}
 
-__gen_reg_read_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
-__gen_reg_read_funcs(fwtable);
+__gen_fwtable_read(8)
+__gen_fwtable_read(16)
+__gen_fwtable_read(32)
+__gen_fwtable_read(64)
 
-#undef __gen_reg_read_funcs
+#undef __gen_fwtable_read
 #undef GEN6_READ_FOOTER
 #undef GEN6_READ_HEADER
 
@@ -2069,22 +2058,22 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __dg2_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
-		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __xehp_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
-		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen12_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
-		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 11) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen11_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen11_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
-		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
+		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 9, 10)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen9_fw_ranges);
 		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen8_shadowed_regs);
-- 
2.25.4

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 10/09/2021 06:33, Matt Roper wrote:
> Consolidate down to just a single 'fwtable' implementation.  For reads
> we don't need to worry about shadow tables.  Also, the
> NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE() check we previously had in the fwtable implementation
> can be dropped --- if a register is outside that range on one of the old
> platforms, then it won't belong to any forcewake range and 0 will be
> returned anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 45 +++++++++++------------------
>   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index c181e74fbf43..95398cb69722 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -935,14 +935,6 @@ static const struct intel_forcewake_range __vlv_fw_ranges[] = {
>   };
>   
>   #define __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
> -({ \
> -	enum forcewake_domains __fwd = 0; \
> -	if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((offset))) \
> -		__fwd = find_fw_domain(uncore, offset); \
> -	__fwd; \
> -})
> -
> -#define __gen11_fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset) \
>   	find_fw_domain(uncore, offset)

Looks like you can drop this macro and just call find_fw_domain or you 
think there is value to keep it?

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   
>   /* *Must* be sorted by offset! See intel_shadow_table_check(). */
> @@ -1577,33 +1569,30 @@ static inline void __force_wake_auto(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>   		___force_wake_auto(uncore, fw_domains);
>   }
>   
> -#define __gen_read(func, x) \
> +#define __gen_fwtable_read(x) \
>   static u##x \
> -func##_read##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) { \
> +fwtable_read##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) \
> +{ \
>   	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
>   	GEN6_READ_HEADER(x); \
> -	fw_engine = __##func##_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
> +	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
>   	if (fw_engine) \
>   		__force_wake_auto(uncore, fw_engine); \
>   	val = __raw_uncore_read##x(uncore, reg); \
>   	GEN6_READ_FOOTER; \
>   }
>   
> -#define __gen_reg_read_funcs(func) \
> -static enum forcewake_domains \
> -func##_reg_read_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) { \
> -	return __##func##_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg)); \
> -} \
> -\
> -__gen_read(func, 8) \
> -__gen_read(func, 16) \
> -__gen_read(func, 32) \
> -__gen_read(func, 64)
> +static enum forcewake_domains
> +fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) {
> +	return __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg));
> +}
>   
> -__gen_reg_read_funcs(gen11_fwtable);
> -__gen_reg_read_funcs(fwtable);
> +__gen_fwtable_read(8)
> +__gen_fwtable_read(16)
> +__gen_fwtable_read(32)
> +__gen_fwtable_read(64)
>   
> -#undef __gen_reg_read_funcs
> +#undef __gen_fwtable_read
>   #undef GEN6_READ_FOOTER
>   #undef GEN6_READ_HEADER
>   
> @@ -2069,22 +2058,22 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
>   		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __dg2_fw_ranges);
>   		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
>   		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
> -		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> +		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
>   		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __xehp_fw_ranges);
>   		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
>   		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
> -		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> +		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12) {
>   		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen12_fw_ranges);
>   		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
>   		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
> -		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> +		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) == 11) {
>   		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen11_fw_ranges);
>   		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen11_shadowed_regs);
>   		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
> -		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, gen11_fwtable);
> +		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
>   	} else if (IS_GRAPHICS_VER(i915, 9, 10)) {
>   		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __gen9_fw_ranges);
>   		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen8_shadowed_regs);
> 

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table

[Matt Roper]

We thought the DG2 table of shadowed registers would be the same as the
gen12/xehp table, but it turns out that there are a few minor
differences that require us to define a new DG2-specific table:
 * One register is removed (0xC4D4)
 * One register is added (0xC4E0)

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c           | 41 ++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c |  1 +
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 95398cb69722..088d9b9d1224 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1018,6 +1018,45 @@ static const struct i915_range gen12_shadowed_regs[] = {
 	{ .start = 0x1F8510, .end = 0x1F8550 },
 };
 
+static const struct i915_range dg2_shadowed_regs[] = {
+	{ .start =   0x2030, .end =   0x2030 },
+	{ .start =   0x2510, .end =   0x2550 },
+	{ .start =   0xA008, .end =   0xA00C },
+	{ .start =   0xA188, .end =   0xA188 },
+	{ .start =   0xA278, .end =   0xA278 },
+	{ .start =   0xA540, .end =   0xA56C },
+	{ .start =   0xC4C8, .end =   0xC4C8 },
+	{ .start =   0xC4E0, .end =   0xC4E0 },
+	{ .start =   0xC600, .end =   0xC600 },
+	{ .start =   0xC658, .end =   0xC658 },
+	{ .start =  0x22030, .end =  0x22030 },
+	{ .start =  0x22510, .end =  0x22550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1C0030, .end = 0x1C0030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1C0510, .end = 0x1C0550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1C4030, .end = 0x1C4030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1C4510, .end = 0x1C4550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1C8030, .end = 0x1C8030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1C8510, .end = 0x1C8550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1D0030, .end = 0x1D0030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1D0510, .end = 0x1D0550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1D4030, .end = 0x1D4030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1D4510, .end = 0x1D4550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1D8030, .end = 0x1D8030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1D8510, .end = 0x1D8550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1E0030, .end = 0x1E0030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1E0510, .end = 0x1E0550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1E4030, .end = 0x1E4030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1E4510, .end = 0x1E4550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1E8030, .end = 0x1E8030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1E8510, .end = 0x1E8550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1F0030, .end = 0x1F0030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1F0510, .end = 0x1F0550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1F4030, .end = 0x1F4030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1F4510, .end = 0x1F4550 },
+	{ .start = 0x1F8030, .end = 0x1F8030 },
+	{ .start = 0x1F8510, .end = 0x1F8550 },
+};
+
 static int mmio_range_cmp(u32 key, const struct i915_range *range)
 {
 	if (key < range->start)
@@ -2056,7 +2095,7 @@ static int uncore_forcewake_init(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
 
 	if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55)) {
 		ASSIGN_FW_DOMAINS_TABLE(uncore, __dg2_fw_ranges);
-		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, gen12_shadowed_regs);
+		ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, dg2_shadowed_regs);
 		ASSIGN_WRITE_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 		ASSIGN_READ_MMIO_VFUNCS(uncore, fwtable);
 	} else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50)) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
index 22ef2c87df1a..bc8128170a99 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static int intel_shadow_table_check(void)
 		{ gen8_shadowed_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(gen8_shadowed_regs) },
 		{ gen11_shadowed_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(gen11_shadowed_regs) },
 		{ gen12_shadowed_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(gen12_shadowed_regs) },
+		{ dg2_shadowed_regs, ARRAY_SIZE(dg2_shadowed_regs) },
 	};
 	const struct i915_range *range;
 	unsigned int i, j;
-- 
2.25.4

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94534/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
9184ecd8873a drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable
2d9ea1a952fa drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore
-:42: CHECK:LINE_SPACING: Please don't use multiple blank lines
#42: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1051:
 
+

-:86: CHECK:LINE_SPACING: Please don't use multiple blank lines
#86: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1720:
 
+

-:94: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'uncore' - possible side-effects?
#94: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1985:
+#define ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, d) \
+{ \
+	(uncore)->shadowed_reg_table = d; \
+	(uncore)->shadowed_reg_table_entries = ARRAY_SIZE((d)); \
+}

-:94: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'd' - possible side-effects?
#94: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1985:
+#define ASSIGN_SHADOW_TABLE(uncore, d) \
+{ \
+	(uncore)->shadowed_reg_table = d; \
+	(uncore)->shadowed_reg_table_entries = ARRAY_SIZE((d)); \
+}

total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 128 lines checked
2a61c25b475a drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable
60268645b0c1 drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
bc9eef9ef981 drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers
-:39: ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#39: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1572:
+#define __gen_fwtable_read(x) \
 static u##x \
+fwtable_read##x(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg, bool trace) \
+{ \
 	enum forcewake_domains fw_engine; \
 	GEN6_READ_HEADER(x); \
+	fw_engine = __fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(uncore, offset); \
 	if (fw_engine) \
 		__force_wake_auto(uncore, fw_engine); \
 	val = __raw_uncore_read##x(uncore, reg); \
 	GEN6_READ_FOOTER; \
 }

-:64: ERROR:OPEN_BRACE: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
#64: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c:1585:
+static enum forcewake_domains
+fwtable_reg_read_fw_domains(struct intel_uncore *uncore, i915_reg_t reg) {

total: 2 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 86 lines checked
2c15e729f1d8 drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94534/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip
Sparse version: v0.6.2
Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:27:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:27:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:27:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:32:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:32:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:49:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:49:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:49:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:56:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_stats.h:56:9: warning: trying to copy expression type 31
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c:1392:5: warning: context imbalance in 'intel_gt_reset_trylock' - different lock contexts for basic block
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1442:15: warning: memset with byte count of 16777216
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c:1496:15: warning: memset with byte count of 16777216
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen11_fwtable_read16' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen11_fwtable_read32' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen11_fwtable_read64' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen11_fwtable_read8' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen11_fwtable_write16' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen11_fwtable_write32' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen11_fwtable_write8' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen12_fwtable_write16' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen12_fwtable_write32' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen12_fwtable_write8' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen6_read16' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen6_read32' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen6_read64' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen6_read8' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen8_write16' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen8_write32' - different lock contexts for basic block
-./include/linux/spinlock.h:409:9: warning: context imbalance in 'gen8_write8' - different lock contexts for basic block

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6364 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94534/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10566 -> Patchwork_21010
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/index.html

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_21010 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@sync-gfx0:
    - fi-kbl-7567u:       NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271]) +17 similar issues
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-kbl-7567u/igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@sync-gfx0.html

  * igt@fbdev@write:
    - fi-bdw-gvtdvm:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109271]) +5 similar issues
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@fbdev@write.html

  * igt@gem_exec_parallel@engines@userptr:
    - fi-pnv-d510:        [PASS][3] -> [INCOMPLETE][4] ([i915#299])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/fi-pnv-d510/igt@gem_exec_parallel@engines@userptr.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-pnv-d510/igt@gem_exec_parallel@engines@userptr.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0:
    - fi-bdw-gvtdvm:      NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][5] ([i915#146])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-bdw-gvtdvm/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
    - fi-kbl-guc:         [PASS][6] -> [FAIL][7] ([i915#2203] / [i915#579])
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-kbl-guc/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
    - fi-bsw-kefka:       [PASS][8] -> [INCOMPLETE][9] ([i915#2940])
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc:
    - fi-rkl-guc:         [PASS][10] -> [DMESG-WARN][11] ([i915#3958])
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/fi-rkl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc.html
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-rkl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm:
    - fi-bsw-nick:        [PASS][12] -> [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([i915#2927] / [i915#3428])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@live@late_gt_pm.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - fi-pnv-d510:        NOTRUN -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2403] / [i915#2722])
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-pnv-d510/igt@runner@aborted.html
    - fi-bsw-kefka:       NOTRUN -> [FAIL][15] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1436] / [i915#3428])
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@runner@aborted.html
    - fi-bsw-nick:        NOTRUN -> [FAIL][16] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1436] / [i915#3428])
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-bsw-nick/igt@runner@aborted.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
    - fi-kbl-7567u:       [DMESG-WARN][17] -> [PASS][18]
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/fi-kbl-7567u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-kbl-7567u/igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
    - {fi-hsw-gt1}:       [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#3303]) -> [PASS][20]
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/fi-hsw-gt1/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/fi-hsw-gt1/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#1436]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1436
  [i915#146]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/146
  [i915#2203]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2203
  [i915#2403]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2403
  [i915#2722]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2722
  [i915#2927]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2927
  [i915#2940]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2940
  [i915#299]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/299
  [i915#3303]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3303
  [i915#3428]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3428
  [i915#3958]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3958
  [i915#579]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/579


Participating hosts (44 -> 39)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-bdw-gvtdvm 
  Missing    (6): bat-dg1-6 bat-dg1-5 fi-bsw-cyan bat-adlp-4 fi-bdw-samus bat-jsl-1 


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_10566 -> Patchwork_21010

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_10566: 8c2d4adb2cd72ea1fae0c95562362319406f6d8e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_6203: 64452a46b57ca4ef35eb65a547df8ed1b131e8f0 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_21010: 2c15e729f1d81620e6c3d8873da217755cee720b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

2c15e729f1d8 drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table
bc9eef9ef981 drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers
60268645b0c1 drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
2a61c25b475a drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable
2d9ea1a952fa drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore
9184ecd8873a drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7709 bytes --]

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30277 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94534/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10566_full -> Patchwork_21010_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21010_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_21010_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_21010_full:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytileccs:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytileccs.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytileccs.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_21010_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile-preempt:
    - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +1 similar issue
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-snb5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile-preempt.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#2846])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][6] -> [FAIL][7] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][8] -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842])
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][10] -> [INCOMPLETE][11] ([i915#456]) +1 similar issue
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0.html

  * igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-odd:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([i915#2428])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-odd.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-big-copy-odd.html

  * igt@gem_pread@exhaustion:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [WARN][14] ([i915#2658])
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl1/igt@gem_pread@exhaustion.html

  * igt@gem_render_copy@y-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#109271]) +9 similar issues
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl7/igt@gem_render_copy@y-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled.html

  * igt@gem_softpin@evict-snoop:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([fdo#109312])
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_softpin@evict-snoop.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3323])
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-sync.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][18] ([i915#3002])
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][19] ([i915#3318])
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@vma-merge.html

  * igt@gen3_mixed_blits:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][20] ([fdo#109271]) +57 similar issues
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl2/igt@gen3_mixed_blits.html

  * igt@gen7_exec_parse@basic-offset:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][21] ([fdo#109289])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@gen7_exec_parse@basic-offset.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-start-cmd:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][22] ([i915#2856]) +1 similar issue
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@gen9_exec_parse@bb-start-cmd.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][23] -> [FAIL][24] ([i915#454])
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-iclb7/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html

  * igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][25] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1937])
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl1/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-non-lpsp:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][26] ([fdo#111644] / [i915#1397] / [i915#2411])
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb2/igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-non-lpsp.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][27] ([fdo#109271]) +293 similar issues
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress.html

  * igt@i915_query@query-topology-unsupported:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][28] ([fdo#109302])
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb2/igt@i915_query@query-topology-unsupported.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][29] ([i915#2373])
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][30] ([i915#1759] / [i915#2291])
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@linear-8bpp-rotate-90:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][31] ([fdo#111614])
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_big_fb@linear-8bpp-rotate-90.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-hflip:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][32] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777]) +1 similar issue
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl3/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][33] ([fdo#111615])
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-bad-pixel-format-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][34] ([i915#3689] / [i915#3886]) +1 similar issue
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-bad-pixel-format-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-sprite-planes-basic-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][35] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +4 similar issues
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-sprite-planes-basic-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-random-ccs-data-yf_tiled_ccs:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][36] ([i915#3689]) +3 similar issues
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-random-ccs-data-yf_tiled_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-bad-rotation-90-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][37] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +11 similar issues
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl1/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-bad-rotation-90-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_cdclk@mode-transition:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][38] ([i915#3742])
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_cdclk@mode-transition.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-aspect-ratio:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][39] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-aspect-ratio.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-edid-change-during-suspend:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][40] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +22 similar issues
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl2/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-edid-change-during-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd-without-ddc:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][41] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +5 similar issues
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd-without-ddc.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red:
    - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][42] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +14 similar issues
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-snb6/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-gamma:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][43] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +1 similar issue
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-gamma.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@lic:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][44] ([i915#1319]) +1 similar issue
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl2/igt@kms_content_protection@lic.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-32x32-offscreen:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][45] ([i915#3319]) +1 similar issue
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-32x32-offscreen.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-512x512-offscreen:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][46] ([fdo#109279] / [i915#3359])
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-512x512-offscreen.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-max-size-sliding:
    - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][47] ([fdo#109271])
   [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-glk9/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-b-cursor-max-size-sliding.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-32x10-rapid-movement:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([i915#3359]) +1 similar issue
   [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-32x10-rapid-movement.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][49] -> [DMESG-WARN][50] ([i915#180])
   [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-apl1/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
   [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursorb-vs-flipb-atomic:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][51] ([fdo#111825]) +21 similar issues
   [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursorb-vs-flipb-atomic.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][52] -> [FAIL][53] ([i915#2346])
   [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-skl7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions.html
   [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl9/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions.html

  * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank@bc-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][54] -> [FAIL][55] ([i915#79])
   [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-glk9/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank@bc-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2.html
   [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-glk7/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank@bc-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2.html

  * igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible@a-edp1:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][56] -> [FAIL][57] ([i915#2122])
   [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-skl7/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible@a-edp1.html
   [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible@a-edp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytileccs:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][58] ([i915#3699])
   [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl7/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytileccs.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-shrfb-msflip-blt:
    - shard-snb:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][59] ([fdo#109271]) +289 similar issues
   [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-snb5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-shrfb-msflip-blt.html

  * igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][60] -> [FAIL][61] ([i915#1188])
   [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-skl7/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html
   [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl9/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_invalid_dotclock:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][62] ([fdo#110577])
   [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_invalid_dotclock.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][63] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) +2 similar issues
   [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl2/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][64] -> [DMESG-WARN][65] ([i915#180]) +1 similar issue
   [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html
   [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-basic:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][66] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
   [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-basic.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-basic:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][67] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +2 similar issues
   [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl3/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-basic.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-transparent-fb:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][68] ([i915#265])
   [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-transparent-fb.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][69] -> [FAIL][70] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +1 similar issue
   [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-skl10/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc.html
   [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl3/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-coverage-7efc.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-none:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][71] ([i915#3536])
   [71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-a-tiling-none.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-c-tiling-none:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][72] ([i915#3536])
   [72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-c-tiling-none.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][73] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +1 similar issue
   [73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-1.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-3:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][74] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +4 similar issues
   [74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-3.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area-2:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][75] ([i915#2920])
   [75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area-2.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_onoff:
    - shard-iclb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][76] ([fdo#109441])
   [76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_onoff.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][77] -> [SKIP][78] ([fdo#109441])
   [77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html
   [78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][79] ([i915#132] / [i915#3467])
   [79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html

  * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][80] ([i915#180] / [i915#295])
   [80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_writeback@writeback-check-output:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][81] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437])
   [81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-check-output.html

  * igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-b-source-outp-inactive:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][82] ([i915#2530]) +1 similar issue
   [82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-b-source-outp-inactive.html

  * igt@perf@polling-parameterized:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][83] -> [FAIL][84] ([i915#1542])
   [83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-skl3/igt@perf@polling-parameterized.html
   [84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl7/igt@perf@polling-parameterized.html

  * igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test3_2:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][85] ([fdo#109291]) +1 similar issue
   [85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test3_2.html

  * igt@syncobj_timeline@single-wait-available-signaled:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][86] -> [DMESG-WARN][87] ([i915#118] / [i915#95]) +1 similar issue
   [86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-glk9/igt@syncobj_timeline@single-wait-available-signaled.html
   [87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-glk7/igt@syncobj_timeline@single-wait-available-signaled.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][88] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +2 similar issues
   [88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-apl2/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@recycle-many:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][89] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994])
   [89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl7/igt@sysfs_clients@recycle-many.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][90] ([i915#2410]) -> [PASS][91] +2 similar issues
   [90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-6/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html
   [91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@many-contexts.html

  * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms:
    - shard-tglb:         [TIMEOUT][92] ([i915#3063]) -> [PASS][93]
   [92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms.html
   [93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms.html

  * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress:
    - shard-tglb:         [TIMEOUT][94] ([i915#2369] / [i915#3063] / [i915#3648]) -> [PASS][95]
   [94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
   [95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][96] ([i915#2846]) -> [PASS][97]
   [96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html
   [97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0:
    - shard-tglb:         [FAIL][98] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][99] +1 similar issue
   [98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html
   [99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-flow@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][100] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][101]
   [100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
   [101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][102] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][103] +1 similar issue
   [102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-glk1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html
   [103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][104] ([i915#2849]) -> [PASS][105]
   [104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html
   [105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume:
    - shard-kbl:          [INCOMPLETE][106] ([i915#155]) -> [PASS][107]
   [106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume.html
   [107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all:
    - shard-glk:          [DMESG-WARN][108] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716]) -> [PASS][109]
   [108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-glk5/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html
   [109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-glk9/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-all.html

  * igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][110] ([i915#3012]) -> [PASS][111]
   [110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness.html
   [111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][112] ([fdo#109308]) -> [PASS][113]
   [112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state.html
   [113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-pci-d3-state.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress-no-wait:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][114] ([i915#1397]) -> [PASS][115]
   [114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress-no-wait.html
   [115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-lpsp-stress-no-wait.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-execbuf:
    - shard-tglb:         [INCOMPLETE][116] ([i915#2411] / [i915#456] / [i915#750]) -> [PASS][117]
   [116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-tglb7/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-execbuf.html
   [117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb3/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-execbuf.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-modeset:
    - shard-skl:          [INCOMPLETE][118] ([i915#151]) -> [PASS][119]
   [118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-skl3/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-modeset.html
   [119]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl7/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend-modeset.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@linear-32bpp-rotate-0:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][120] ([i915#3638]) -> [PASS][121]
   [120]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-1/igt@kms_big_fb@linear-32bpp-rotate-0.html
   [121]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_big_fb@linear-32bpp-rotate-0.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@linear-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][122] ([i915#3721]) -> [PASS][123] +4 similar issues
   [122]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-1/igt@kms_big_fb@linear-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180.html
   [123]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_big_fb@linear-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-32bpp-rotate-270:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][124] ([fdo#111614]) -> [PASS][125]
   [124]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-5/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-32bpp-rotate-270.html
   [125]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-32bpp-rotate-270.html

  * igt@kms_color@pipe-b-ctm-0-25:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][126] ([i915#1149] / [i915#1849] / [i915#4070]) -> [PASS][127] +3 similar issues
   [126]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-1/igt@kms_color@pipe-b-ctm-0-25.html
   [127]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_color@pipe-b-ctm-0-25.html

  * igt@kms_concurrent@pipe-b:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][128] ([i915#1845] / [i915#4070]) -> [PASS][129]
   [128]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-1/igt@kms_concurrent@pipe-b.html
   [129]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_concurrent@pipe-b.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-64x21-onscreen:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][130] ([fdo#112022] / [i915#4070]) -> [PASS][131] +6 similar issues
   [130]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-1/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-64x21-onscreen.html
   [131]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-64x21-onscreen.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          [DMESG-WARN][132] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][133] +3 similar issues
   [132]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
   [133]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
    - shard-tglb:         [INCOMPLETE][134] ([i915#2411] / [i915#456]) -> [PASS][135]
   [134]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html
   [135]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-tglb2/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-256x256-left-edge:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][136] ([i915#1849] / [i915#4070]) -> [PASS][137] +4 similar issues
   [136]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-rkl-1/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-256x256-left-edge.html
   [137]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_cursor_edge_walk@pipe-b-256x256-left-edge.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][138] ([i915#2346] / [i915#533]) -> [PASS][139]
   [138]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10566/shard-skl6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html
   [139]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-busy-crc-atomic:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][140] ([fdo#111825] /

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21010/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 33561 bytes --]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 10/09/2021 06:33, Matt Roper wrote:
> Our uncore MMIO functions for reading/writing registers have become very
> complicated over time.  There's significant macro magic used to generate
> several nearly-identical functions that only really differ in terms of
> which platform-specific shadow register table they should check on write
> operations.  We can significantly simplify our MMIO handlers by storing
> a reference to the current platform's shadow table within the 'struct
> intel_uncore' the same way we already do for forcewake; this allows us
> to consolidate the multiple variants of each 'write' function down to
> just a single 'fwtable' version that gets the shadow table out of the
> uncore struct rather than hardcoding the name of a specific platform's
> table.  We can do similar consolidation on the MMIO read side by
> creating a single-entry forcewake table to replace the open-coded range
> check they had been using previously.
> 
> The final patch of the series adds a new shadow table for DG2; this
> becomes quite clean and simple now, given the refactoring in the first
> five patches.

Tidy and it ends up saving kernel binary size.

However I am undecided yet, because one thing to note is that the trade 
off is source code and kernel text consolidation at the expense of more 
indirect calls at runtime and larger common read/write functions.

To expand, current code generates a bunch of per gen functions but in 
doing so it manages to inline a bunch of checks like NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE 
and BSEARCH (from find_fw_domain) so at runtime each platform mmio 
read/write does not have to do indirect calls to do lookups.

It may matter a lot in the grand scheme of things but this trade off is 
something to note in the cover letter I think.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> Matt Roper (6):
>    drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable
>    drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore
>    drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable
>    drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
>    drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers
>    drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c           | 190 ++++++++++--------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h           |   7 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c |   1 +
>   3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> 

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Matt Roper]

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 10/09/2021 06:33, Matt Roper wrote:
> > Our uncore MMIO functions for reading/writing registers have become very
> > complicated over time.  There's significant macro magic used to generate
> > several nearly-identical functions that only really differ in terms of
> > which platform-specific shadow register table they should check on write
> > operations.  We can significantly simplify our MMIO handlers by storing
> > a reference to the current platform's shadow table within the 'struct
> > intel_uncore' the same way we already do for forcewake; this allows us
> > to consolidate the multiple variants of each 'write' function down to
> > just a single 'fwtable' version that gets the shadow table out of the
> > uncore struct rather than hardcoding the name of a specific platform's
> > table.  We can do similar consolidation on the MMIO read side by
> > creating a single-entry forcewake table to replace the open-coded range
> > check they had been using previously.
> > 
> > The final patch of the series adds a new shadow table for DG2; this
> > becomes quite clean and simple now, given the refactoring in the first
> > five patches.
> 
> Tidy and it ends up saving kernel binary size.
> 
> However I am undecided yet, because one thing to note is that the trade off
> is source code and kernel text consolidation at the expense of more indirect
> calls at runtime and larger common read/write functions.
> 
> To expand, current code generates a bunch of per gen functions but in doing
> so it manages to inline a bunch of checks like NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE and BSEARCH
> (from find_fw_domain) so at runtime each platform mmio read/write does not
> have to do indirect calls to do lookups.
> 
> It may matter a lot in the grand scheme of things but this trade off is
> something to note in the cover letter I think.

That's true.  However it seems like if the extra indirect calls are good
enough for our forcewake lookups (which are called more frequently and
have to search through much larger tables) then using the same strategy
for shadow registers should be less of a concern.  Plus most of
timing-critical parts of the code don't call through this at all; they
just grab an explicit forcewake and then issue a bunch of *_fw()
operations that skip all the per-register forcewake and shadow handling.

But you're right that this is something I should mention more clearly in
the cover letter.


Matt

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko
> 
> > Matt Roper (6):
> >    drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable
> >    drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore
> >    drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable
> >    drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
> >    drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers
> >    drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table
> > 
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c           | 190 ++++++++++--------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h           |   7 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c |   1 +
> >   3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> > 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 10/09/2021 15:24, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 10/09/2021 06:33, Matt Roper wrote:
>>> Our uncore MMIO functions for reading/writing registers have become very
>>> complicated over time.  There's significant macro magic used to generate
>>> several nearly-identical functions that only really differ in terms of
>>> which platform-specific shadow register table they should check on write
>>> operations.  We can significantly simplify our MMIO handlers by storing
>>> a reference to the current platform's shadow table within the 'struct
>>> intel_uncore' the same way we already do for forcewake; this allows us
>>> to consolidate the multiple variants of each 'write' function down to
>>> just a single 'fwtable' version that gets the shadow table out of the
>>> uncore struct rather than hardcoding the name of a specific platform's
>>> table.  We can do similar consolidation on the MMIO read side by
>>> creating a single-entry forcewake table to replace the open-coded range
>>> check they had been using previously.
>>>
>>> The final patch of the series adds a new shadow table for DG2; this
>>> becomes quite clean and simple now, given the refactoring in the first
>>> five patches.
>>
>> Tidy and it ends up saving kernel binary size.
>>
>> However I am undecided yet, because one thing to note is that the trade off
>> is source code and kernel text consolidation at the expense of more indirect
>> calls at runtime and larger common read/write functions.
>>
>> To expand, current code generates a bunch of per gen functions but in doing
>> so it manages to inline a bunch of checks like NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE and BSEARCH
>> (from find_fw_domain) so at runtime each platform mmio read/write does not
>> have to do indirect calls to do lookups.
>>
>> It may matter a lot in the grand scheme of things but this trade off is
>> something to note in the cover letter I think.
> 
> That's true.  However it seems like if the extra indirect calls are good
> enough for our forcewake lookups (which are called more frequently and
> have to search through much larger tables) then using the same strategy
> for shadow registers should be less of a concern.  Plus most of
> timing-critical parts of the code don't call through this at all; they
> just grab an explicit forcewake and then issue a bunch of *_fw()
> operations that skip all the per-register forcewake and shadow handling.

With lookups you mean intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg? Yeah I don't have 
a good idea of how many of those followed by "_fw" accessors we have vs 
"un-optimized" access. But it's a good point.

I was mostly coming from the point of view of old platforms like gen6, 
where with this series reads go from inlined checks (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE) 
to always calling find_fw_domain. Just because it is a bit unfortunate 
to burden old CPUs (they are not getting any faster) with executing more 
code. It's not nice when old hardware gets slower and slower with 
software updates. :) But whether or not this case would at all be 
measurable.. probably not. Unless some compounding effects, like "death 
by thousand cuts", would come into play.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> But you're right that this is something I should mention more clearly in
> the cover letter.
> 
> 
> Matt
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tvrtko
>>
>>> Matt Roper (6):
>>>     drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable
>>>     drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore
>>>     drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable
>>>     drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
>>>     drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers
>>>     drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table
>>>
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c           | 190 ++++++++++--------
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h           |   7 +
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c |   1 +
>>>    3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
>>>
> 

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] i915: Simplify mmio handling & add new DG2 shadow table

[Matt Roper]

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:03:50PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 10/09/2021 15:24, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 10/09/2021 06:33, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > Our uncore MMIO functions for reading/writing registers have become very
> > > > complicated over time.  There's significant macro magic used to generate
> > > > several nearly-identical functions that only really differ in terms of
> > > > which platform-specific shadow register table they should check on write
> > > > operations.  We can significantly simplify our MMIO handlers by storing
> > > > a reference to the current platform's shadow table within the 'struct
> > > > intel_uncore' the same way we already do for forcewake; this allows us
> > > > to consolidate the multiple variants of each 'write' function down to
> > > > just a single 'fwtable' version that gets the shadow table out of the
> > > > uncore struct rather than hardcoding the name of a specific platform's
> > > > table.  We can do similar consolidation on the MMIO read side by
> > > > creating a single-entry forcewake table to replace the open-coded range
> > > > check they had been using previously.
> > > > 
> > > > The final patch of the series adds a new shadow table for DG2; this
> > > > becomes quite clean and simple now, given the refactoring in the first
> > > > five patches.
> > > 
> > > Tidy and it ends up saving kernel binary size.
> > > 
> > > However I am undecided yet, because one thing to note is that the trade off
> > > is source code and kernel text consolidation at the expense of more indirect
> > > calls at runtime and larger common read/write functions.
> > > 
> > > To expand, current code generates a bunch of per gen functions but in doing
> > > so it manages to inline a bunch of checks like NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE and BSEARCH
> > > (from find_fw_domain) so at runtime each platform mmio read/write does not
> > > have to do indirect calls to do lookups.
> > > 
> > > It may matter a lot in the grand scheme of things but this trade off is
> > > something to note in the cover letter I think.
> > 
> > That's true.  However it seems like if the extra indirect calls are good
> > enough for our forcewake lookups (which are called more frequently and
> > have to search through much larger tables) then using the same strategy
> > for shadow registers should be less of a concern.  Plus most of
> > timing-critical parts of the code don't call through this at all; they
> > just grab an explicit forcewake and then issue a bunch of *_fw()
> > operations that skip all the per-register forcewake and shadow handling.
> 
> With lookups you mean intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg? Yeah I don't have a
> good idea of how many of those followed by "_fw" accessors we have vs
> "un-optimized" access. But it's a good point.
> 
> I was mostly coming from the point of view of old platforms like gen6, where
> with this series reads go from inlined checks (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE) to always
> calling find_fw_domain. Just because it is a bit unfortunate to burden old
> CPUs (they are not getting any faster) with executing more code. It's not
> nice when old hardware gets slower and slower with software updates. :) But
> whether or not this case would at all be measurable.. probably not. Unless
> some compounding effects, like "death by thousand cuts", would come into
> play.

Chris pointed out in an offline mail that NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE does cut cut
out a lot of display MMIO lookups.  So I think it might be worth adding
that back, but also adding an "|| GEN11_BSD_RING_BASE" so that it will
still be accurate for the newer platforms too.

But I think another thing to consider here would be that we might want
to switch our intel_de_{read,write} wrappers to call raw mmio directly,
to completely bypass forcewake and shadow logic.


Matt

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko
> 
> > But you're right that this is something I should mention more clearly in
> > the cover letter.
> > 
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Tvrtko
> > > 
> > > > Matt Roper (6):
> > > >     drm/i915/uncore: Convert gen6/gen7 read operations to fwtable
> > > >     drm/i915/uncore: Associate shadow table with uncore
> > > >     drm/i915/uncore: Replace gen8 write functions with general fwtable
> > > >     drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11/gen12 mmio write handlers
> > > >     drm/i915/uncore: Drop gen11 mmio read handlers
> > > >     drm/i915/dg2: Add DG2-specific shadow register table
> > > > 
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c           | 190 ++++++++++--------
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h           |   7 +
> > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_uncore.c |   1 +
> > > >    3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795