public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 8/9] drm/i915: Prepare link training for per-lane drive settings
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 23:26:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929202602.GJ2192289@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929165452.11283-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 07:54:52PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Adjust the link training code to accommodate per-lane drive settings,
> if supported by the platform. Actually enabling this will involve
> some changes to each platform's .set_signal_level() implementation,
> so for the moment all supported platforms will keep using the current
> codepath that just uses the same drive settings for all the lanes.
> 
> v2: Fix min() vs. max() fumble
> v3: Compact the debug print to a single line
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c | 78 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index d52929855cd0..f26c44a6b568 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -301,21 +301,33 @@ static u8 intel_dp_phy_preemph_max(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	return preemph_max;
>  }
>  
> -void
> -intel_dp_get_adjust_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> -			  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> -			  enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy,
> -			  const u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE])
> +static bool has_per_lane_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +				       enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static u8 intel_dp_get_lane_adjust_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +					 const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +					 enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy,
> +					 const u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE],
> +					 int lane)
>  {
>  	u8 v = 0;
>  	u8 p = 0;
> -	int lane;
>  	u8 voltage_max;
>  	u8 preemph_max;
>  
> -	for (lane = 0; lane < crtc_state->lane_count; lane++) {
> -		v = max(v, drm_dp_get_adjust_request_voltage(link_status, lane));
> -		p = max(p, drm_dp_get_adjust_request_pre_emphasis(link_status, lane));
> +	if (has_per_lane_signal_levels(intel_dp, dp_phy)) {
> +		lane = min(lane, crtc_state->lane_count - 1);
> +
> +		v = drm_dp_get_adjust_request_voltage(link_status, lane);
> +		p = drm_dp_get_adjust_request_pre_emphasis(link_status, lane);
> +	} else {
> +		for (lane = 0; lane < crtc_state->lane_count; lane++) {
> +			v = max(v, drm_dp_get_adjust_request_voltage(link_status, lane));
> +			p = max(p, drm_dp_get_adjust_request_pre_emphasis(link_status, lane));
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	preemph_max = intel_dp_phy_preemph_max(intel_dp, dp_phy);
> @@ -328,8 +340,21 @@ intel_dp_get_adjust_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	if (v >= voltage_max)
>  		v = voltage_max | DP_TRAIN_MAX_SWING_REACHED;
>  
> +	return v | p;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +intel_dp_get_adjust_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> +			  const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +			  enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy,
> +			  const u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE])
> +{
> +	int lane;
> +
>  	for (lane = 0; lane < 4; lane++)
> -		intel_dp->train_set[lane] = v | p;
> +		intel_dp->train_set[lane] =
> +			intel_dp_get_lane_adjust_train(intel_dp, crtc_state,
> +						       dp_phy, link_status, lane);
>  }
>  
>  static int intel_dp_training_pattern_set_reg(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> @@ -394,22 +419,39 @@ intel_dp_program_link_training_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	intel_dp->set_link_train(intel_dp, crtc_state, dp_train_pat);
>  }
>  
> +#define TRAIN_SET_FMT "%d%s/%d%s/%d%s/%d%s"
> +#define _TRAIN_SET_VSWING_ARGS(train_set) \
> +	((train_set) & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK) >> DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_SHIFT, \
> +	(train_set) & DP_TRAIN_MAX_SWING_REACHED ? "(max)" : ""
> +#define TRAIN_SET_VSWING_ARGS(train_set) \
> +	_TRAIN_SET_VSWING_ARGS((train_set)[0]), \
> +	_TRAIN_SET_VSWING_ARGS((train_set)[1]), \
> +	_TRAIN_SET_VSWING_ARGS((train_set)[2]), \
> +	_TRAIN_SET_VSWING_ARGS((train_set)[3])
> +#define _TRAIN_SET_PREEMPH_ARGS(train_set) \
> +	((train_set) & DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_MASK) >> DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_SHIFT, \
> +	(train_set) & DP_TRAIN_MAX_PRE_EMPHASIS_REACHED ? "(max)" : ""
> +#define TRAIN_SET_PREEMPH_ARGS(train_set) \
> +	_TRAIN_SET_PREEMPH_ARGS((train_set)[0]), \
> +	_TRAIN_SET_PREEMPH_ARGS((train_set)[1]), \
> +	_TRAIN_SET_PREEMPH_ARGS((train_set)[2]), \
> +	_TRAIN_SET_PREEMPH_ARGS((train_set)[3])
> +
>  void intel_dp_set_signal_levels(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  				const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  				enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
>  {
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder = &dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> -	u8 train_set = intel_dp->train_set[0];
>  	char phy_name[10];
>  
> -	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Using vswing level %d%s, pre-emphasis level %d%s, at %s\n",
> -		    train_set & DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_MASK,
> -		    train_set & DP_TRAIN_MAX_SWING_REACHED ? " (max)" : "",
> -		    (train_set & DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_MASK) >>
> -		    DP_TRAIN_PRE_EMPHASIS_SHIFT,
> -		    train_set & DP_TRAIN_MAX_PRE_EMPHASIS_REACHED ?
> -		    " (max)" : "",
> +	drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "[ENCODER:%d:%s] lanes: %d, "
> +		    "vswing levels: " TRAIN_SET_FMT ", "
> +		    "pre-emphasis levels: " TRAIN_SET_FMT ", at %s\n",
> +		    encoder->base.base.id, encoder->base.name,
> +		    crtc_state->lane_count,
> +		    TRAIN_SET_VSWING_ARGS(intel_dp->train_set),
> +		    TRAIN_SET_PREEMPH_ARGS(intel_dp->train_set),
>  		    intel_dp_phy_name(dp_phy, phy_name, sizeof(phy_name)));

Could print the PHY name after [ENCODER:x:y].

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

>  
>  	if (intel_dp_phy_is_downstream_of_source(intel_dp, dp_phy))
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-29 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-27 18:24 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915: DP per-lane drive settings prep work Ville Syrjala
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: s/ddi_translations/trans/ Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 16:59   ` Imre Deak
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Generalize .set_signal_levels() Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 19:17   ` Imre Deak
2021-09-30  7:33     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Nuke usless .set_signal_levels() wrappers Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 19:43   ` Imre Deak
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: De-wrapper bxt_ddi_phy_set_signal_levels() Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 19:48   ` Imre Deak
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: Hoover the level>=n_entries WARN into intel_ddi_level() Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 20:09   ` Imre Deak
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Nuke intel_ddi_hdmi_num_entries() Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 20:11   ` Imre Deak
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Pass the lane to intel_ddi_level() Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 20:14   ` Imre Deak
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915: Prepare link training for per-lane drive settings Ville Syrjala
2021-09-28 21:22   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 16:54   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 20:26     ` Imre Deak [this message]
2021-09-30  7:07       ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-09-27 18:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915: Allow per-lane drive settings with LTTPRs Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 16:55   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2021-09-29 20:27     ` Imre Deak
2021-09-27 20:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: DP per-lane drive settings prep work Patchwork
2021-09-27 20:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-27 20:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-28  1:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-28 21:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: DP per-lane drive settings prep work (rev2) Patchwork
2021-09-28 21:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-28 22:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-29  0:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-29 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: DP per-lane drive settings prep work (rev4) Patchwork
2021-09-29 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-29 18:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-29 21:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210929202602.GJ2192289@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox