public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/26] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 18:31:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211008013109.GA854@jons-linux-dev-box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f03536a0-2ffe-ed40-041e-0f277960a60d@intel.com>

On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 12:50:28PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
> On 10/4/2021 15:06, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > Add multi-lrc context registration H2G. In addition a workqueue and
> > process descriptor are setup during multi-lrc context registration as
> > these data structures are needed for multi-lrc submission.
> > 
> > v2:
> >   (John Harrison)
> >    - Move GuC specific fields into sub-struct
> >    - Clean up WQ defines
> >    - Add comment explaining math to derive WQ / PD address
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |  12 ++
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c           |   5 +
> >   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h  |   1 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h   |   2 -
> >   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++-
> >   5 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> > index 76dfca57cb45..48decb5ee954 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
> > @@ -239,6 +239,18 @@ struct intel_context {
> >   		struct intel_context *parent;
> >   		/** @number_children: number of children if parent */
> >   		u8 number_children;
> > +		/** @guc: GuC specific members for parallel submission */
> > +		struct {
> > +			/** @wqi_head: head pointer in work queue */
> > +			u16 wqi_head;
> > +			/** @wqi_tail: tail pointer in work queue */
> > +			u16 wqi_tail;
> > +			/**
> > +			 * @parent_page: page in context state (ce->state) used
> > +			 * by parent for work queue, process descriptor
> > +			 */
> > +			u8 parent_page;
> > +		} guc;
> >   	} parallel;
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> > index 3ef9eaf8c50e..57339d5c1fc8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -942,6 +942,11 @@ __lrc_alloc_state(struct intel_context *ce, struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> >   		context_size += PAGE_SIZE;
> >   	}
> > +	if (intel_context_is_parent(ce) && intel_engine_uses_guc(engine)) {
> > +		ce->parallel.guc.parent_page = context_size / PAGE_SIZE;
> > +		context_size += PAGE_SIZE;
> > +	}
> > +
> >   	obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(engine->i915, context_size,
> >   					  I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_VOLATILE);
> >   	if (IS_ERR(obj))
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> > index 8ff582222aff..ba10bd374cee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ enum intel_guc_action {
> >   	INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER = 0x4505,
> >   	INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_COMMAND_TRANSPORT_BUFFER = 0x4506,
> >   	INTEL_GUC_ACTION_DEREGISTER_CONTEXT_DONE = 0x4600,
> > +	INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC = 0x4601,
> >   	INTEL_GUC_ACTION_RESET_CLIENT = 0x5507,
> >   	INTEL_GUC_ACTION_LIMIT
> >   };
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
> > index fa4be13c8854..0eeb2a9feeed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h
> > @@ -52,8 +52,6 @@
> >   #define GUC_DOORBELL_INVALID		256
> > -#define GUC_WQ_SIZE			(PAGE_SIZE * 2)
> > -
> >   /* Work queue item header definitions */
> >   #define WQ_STATUS_ACTIVE		1
> >   #define WQ_STATUS_SUSPENDED		2
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > index 451d9ae861a6..ab6d7fc1b0b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> > @@ -344,6 +344,45 @@ static inline struct i915_priolist *to_priolist(struct rb_node *rb)
> >   	return rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node);
> >   }
> > +/*
> > + * When using multi-lrc submission an extra page in the context state is
> > + * reserved for the process descriptor and work queue.
> > + *
> > + * The layout of this page is below:
> > + * 0						guc_process_desc
> > + * ...						unused
> > + * PAGE_SIZE / 2				work queue start
> > + * ...						work queue
> > + * PAGE_SIZE - 1				work queue end
> > + */
> > +#define WQ_SIZE			(PAGE_SIZE / 2)
> > +#define WQ_OFFSET		(PAGE_SIZE - WQ_SIZE)
> I thought you were going with '#define PARENT_SCRATCH SIZE PAGE_SIZE' and
> then using that everywhere else? Unless there is a fundamental reason why
> the above must be exactly a page in size then I think the size should be
> defined once and re-used rather than assumed in multiple places (including
> in the description comment).
> 

Right, forgot about that. Will fix.

> > +static u32 __get_process_desc_offset(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > +	GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->parallel.guc.parent_page);
> > +
> > +	return ce->parallel.guc.parent_page * PAGE_SIZE;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u32 __get_wq_offset(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > +	return __get_process_desc_offset(ce) + WQ_OFFSET;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct guc_process_desc *
> > +__get_process_desc(struct intel_context *ce)
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Need to subtract LRC_STATE_OFFSET here as the
> > +	 * parallel.guc.parent_page is the offset into ce->state while
> > +	 * ce->lrc_reg_reg is ce->state + LRC_STATE_OFFSET.
> > +	 */
> > +	return (struct guc_process_desc *)
> > +		(ce->lrc_reg_state +
> > +		 ((__get_process_desc_offset(ce) -
> > +		   LRC_STATE_OFFSET) / sizeof(u32)));
> > +}
> > +
> >   static struct guc_lrc_desc *__get_lrc_desc(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 index)
> >   {
> >   	struct guc_lrc_desc *base = guc->lrc_desc_pool_vaddr;
> > @@ -1365,6 +1404,30 @@ static void unpin_guc_id(struct intel_guc *guc, struct intel_context *ce)
> >   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&guc->submission_state.lock, flags);
> >   }
> > +static int __guc_action_register_multi_lrc(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > +					   struct intel_context *ce,
> > +					   u32 guc_id,
> > +					   u32 offset,
> > +					   bool loop)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_context *child;
> > +	u32 action[4 + MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE];
> > +	int len = 0;
> > +
> > +	GEM_BUG_ON(ce->parallel.number_children > MAX_ENGINE_INSTANCE);
> > +
> > +	action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC;
> > +	action[len++] = guc_id;
> > +	action[len++] = ce->parallel.number_children + 1;
> > +	action[len++] = offset;
> > +	for_each_child(ce, child) {
> > +		offset += sizeof(struct guc_lrc_desc);
> > +		action[len++] = offset;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return guc_submission_send_busy_loop(guc, action, len, 0, loop);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int __guc_action_register_context(struct intel_guc *guc,
> >   					 u32 guc_id,
> >   					 u32 offset,
> > @@ -1387,9 +1450,15 @@ static int register_context(struct intel_context *ce, bool loop)
> >   		ce->guc_id.id * sizeof(struct guc_lrc_desc);
> >   	int ret;
> > +	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
> >   	trace_intel_context_register(ce);
> > -	ret = __guc_action_register_context(guc, ce->guc_id.id, offset, loop);
> > +	if (intel_context_is_parent(ce))
> > +		ret = __guc_action_register_multi_lrc(guc, ce, ce->guc_id.id,
> > +						      offset, loop);
> > +	else
> > +		ret = __guc_action_register_context(guc, ce->guc_id.id, offset,
> > +						    loop);
> >   	if (likely(!ret)) {
> >   		unsigned long flags;
> > @@ -1418,6 +1487,7 @@ static int deregister_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 guc_id)
> >   {
> >   	struct intel_guc *guc = ce_to_guc(ce);
> > +	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
> >   	trace_intel_context_deregister(ce);
> >   	return __guc_action_deregister_context(guc, guc_id);
> > @@ -1445,6 +1515,7 @@ static int guc_lrc_desc_pin(struct intel_context *ce, bool loop)
> >   	struct guc_lrc_desc *desc;
> >   	bool context_registered;
> >   	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > +	struct intel_context *child;
> >   	int ret = 0;
> >   	GEM_BUG_ON(!engine->mask);
> > @@ -1470,6 +1541,41 @@ static int guc_lrc_desc_pin(struct intel_context *ce, bool loop)
> >   	desc->context_flags = CONTEXT_REGISTRATION_FLAG_KMD;
> >   	guc_context_policy_init(engine, desc);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Context is a parent, we need to register a process descriptor
> > +	 * describing a work queue and register all child contexts.
> > +	 */
> This was now meant to say 'If the context is a parent...'?
> 

Yep, that is what it should say. Will fix.

Matt

> John.
> 
> > +	if (intel_context_is_parent(ce)) {
> > +		struct guc_process_desc *pdesc;
> > +
> > +		ce->parallel.guc.wqi_tail = 0;
> > +		ce->parallel.guc.wqi_head = 0;
> > +
> > +		desc->process_desc = i915_ggtt_offset(ce->state) +
> > +			__get_process_desc_offset(ce);
> > +		desc->wq_addr = i915_ggtt_offset(ce->state) +
> > +			__get_wq_offset(ce);
> > +		desc->wq_size = WQ_SIZE;
> > +
> > +		pdesc = __get_process_desc(ce);
> > +		memset(pdesc, 0, sizeof(*(pdesc)));
> > +		pdesc->stage_id = ce->guc_id.id;
> > +		pdesc->wq_base_addr = desc->wq_addr;
> > +		pdesc->wq_size_bytes = desc->wq_size;
> > +		pdesc->wq_status = WQ_STATUS_ACTIVE;
> > +
> > +		for_each_child(ce, child) {
> > +			desc = __get_lrc_desc(guc, child->guc_id.id);
> > +
> > +			desc->engine_class =
> > +				engine_class_to_guc_class(engine->class);
> > +			desc->hw_context_desc = child->lrc.lrca;
> > +			desc->priority = ce->guc_state.prio;
> > +			desc->context_flags = CONTEXT_REGISTRATION_FLAG_KMD;
> > +			guc_context_policy_init(engine, desc);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >   	/*
> >   	 * The context_lookup xarray is used to determine if the hardware
> >   	 * context is currently registered. There are two cases in which it
> > @@ -2804,6 +2910,12 @@ g2h_context_lookup(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 desc_idx)
> >   		return NULL;
> >   	}
> > +	if (unlikely(intel_context_is_child(ce))) {
> > +		drm_err(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,
> > +			"Context is child, desc_idx %u", desc_idx);
> > +		return NULL;
> > +	}
> > +
> >   	return ce;
> >   }
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-08  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-04 22:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/26] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/26] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC guc_id allocation under submission state sub-struct Matthew Brost
2021-10-07  3:06   ` John Harrison
2021-10-07 15:05     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 18:13       ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/26] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-10-07  3:37   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08  1:28     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 18:23     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/26] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-07  3:45   ` John Harrison
2021-10-07 15:19     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 18:15       ` John Harrison
2021-10-08  1:23         ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/26] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-10-07  3:49   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/26] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:03   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/26] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/26] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:35   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 18:33     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/26] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:50   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08  1:31     ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-10-08 17:20     ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 17:29       ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/26] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 20:23   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/26] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 22:03   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08  1:21     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 16:40       ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 18:03         ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:11           ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement parallel context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-05  7:55   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-05 10:37   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-08 17:20   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 18:24     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/26] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:39   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 17:56     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/26] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:46   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/26] drm/i915: Fix bug in user proto-context creation that leaked contexts Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:49   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/26] drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 22:09   ` John Harrison
2021-10-11 22:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/26] drm/i915/doc: Update parallel submit doc to point to i915_drm.h Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/26] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement no mid batch preemption for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 23:32   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  1:52     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/26] drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-05  8:31   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-05 17:02   ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-06 20:46   ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 21:22   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:37     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/26] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 21:56   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:18     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/26] drm/i915: Make request conflict tracking understand parallel submits Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 22:08   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:35       ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 17:51     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:25       ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/26] drm/i915: Update I915_GEM_BUSY IOCTL to understand composite fences Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 22:15   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-10-12  7:53   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-10-12 18:31     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/26] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/26] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf (rev4) Patchwork
2021-10-12 22:15   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:15     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:24       ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-04 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-10-12 22:15   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:12     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-05  1:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf (rev5) Patchwork
2021-10-05  1:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-05  1:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-10-05  2:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-12 18:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/26] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211008013109.GA854@jons-linux-dev-box \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox