public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 10:39:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d816209-7c88-8059-ff04-0cb7559f2c2f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211004220637.14746-15-matthew.brost@intel.com>

On 10/4/2021 15:06, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Update context and full GPU reset to work with multi-lrc. The idea is
> parent context tracks all the active requests inflight for itself and
> its' children. The parent context owns the reset replaying / canceling
Still its' should be its.

> requests as needed.
>
> v2:
>   (John Harrison)
>    - Simply loop in find active request
>    - Add comments to find ative request / reset loop
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c       | 15 +++-
>   .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 69 ++++++++++++++-----
>   2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> index c5bb7ccfb3f8..3b340eb59ada 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> @@ -528,20 +528,29 @@ struct i915_request *intel_context_create_request(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   struct i915_request *intel_context_find_active_request(struct intel_context *ce)
>   {
> +	struct intel_context *parent = intel_context_to_parent(ce);
>   	struct i915_request *rq, *active = NULL;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_uses_guc(ce->engine));
>   
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> -	list_for_each_entry_reverse(rq, &ce->guc_state.requests,
> +	/*
> +	 * We search the parent list to find an active request on the submitted
> +	 * context. The parent list contains the requests for all the contexts
> +	 * in the relationship so we have to do a compare of each request's
> +	 * context must be done.
"have to do ... must be done" - no need for both.

> +	 */
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&parent->guc_state.lock, flags);
> +	list_for_each_entry_reverse(rq, &parent->guc_state.requests,
>   				    sched.link) {
> +		if (rq->context != ce)
> +			continue;
>   		if (i915_request_completed(rq))
>   			break;
>   
>   		active = rq;
>   	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&parent->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   
>   	return active;
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index 6be7adf89e4f..d661a69ef4f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -681,6 +681,11 @@ static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
>   	return rq->sched.attr.priority;
>   }
>   
> +static inline bool is_multi_lrc(struct intel_context *ce)
> +{
> +	return intel_context_is_parallel(ce);
> +}
> +
>   static bool is_multi_lrc_rq(struct i915_request *rq)
>   {
>   	return intel_context_is_parallel(rq->context);
> @@ -1214,10 +1219,15 @@ __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_context *ce)
>   
>   static void __guc_reset_context(struct intel_context *ce, bool stalled)
>   {
> +	bool local_stalled;
>   	struct i915_request *rq;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	u32 head;
> +	int i, number_children = ce->parallel.number_children;
>   	bool skip = false;
> +	struct intel_context *parent = ce;
> +
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
>   
>   	intel_context_get(ce);
>   
> @@ -1243,25 +1253,38 @@ static void __guc_reset_context(struct intel_context *ce, bool stalled)
>   	if (unlikely(skip))
>   		goto out_put;
>   
> -	rq = intel_context_find_active_request(ce);
> -	if (!rq) {
> -		head = ce->ring->tail;
> -		stalled = false;
> -		goto out_replay;
> -	}
> +	/*
> +	 * For each context in the relationship find the hanging request
> +	 * resetting each context / request as needed
> +	 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < number_children + 1; ++i) {
> +		if (!intel_context_is_pinned(ce))
> +			goto next_context;
> +
> +		local_stalled = false;
> +		rq = intel_context_find_active_request(ce);
> +		if (!rq) {
> +			head = ce->ring->tail;
> +			goto out_replay;
> +		}
>   
> -	if (!i915_request_started(rq))
> -		stalled = false;
> +		GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(&ce->active));
> +		head = intel_ring_wrap(ce->ring, rq->head);
>   
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_active_is_idle(&ce->active));
> -	head = intel_ring_wrap(ce->ring, rq->head);
> -	__i915_request_reset(rq, stalled);
> +		if (i915_request_started(rq))
I didn't see an answer as to why the started test and the wrap call need 
to be reversed?

John.

> +			local_stalled = true;
>   
> +		__i915_request_reset(rq, local_stalled && stalled);
>   out_replay:
> -	guc_reset_state(ce, head, stalled);
> -	__unwind_incomplete_requests(ce);
> +		guc_reset_state(ce, head, local_stalled && stalled);
> +next_context:
> +		if (i != number_children)
> +			ce = list_next_entry(ce, parallel.child_link);
> +	}
> +
> +	__unwind_incomplete_requests(parent);
>   out_put:
> -	intel_context_put(ce);
> +	intel_context_put(parent);
>   }
>   
>   void intel_guc_submission_reset(struct intel_guc *guc, bool stalled)
> @@ -1282,7 +1305,8 @@ void intel_guc_submission_reset(struct intel_guc *guc, bool stalled)
>   
>   		xa_unlock(&guc->context_lookup);
>   
> -		if (intel_context_is_pinned(ce))
> +		if (intel_context_is_pinned(ce) &&
> +		    !intel_context_is_child(ce))
>   			__guc_reset_context(ce, stalled);
>   
>   		intel_context_put(ce);
> @@ -1374,7 +1398,8 @@ void intel_guc_submission_cancel_requests(struct intel_guc *guc)
>   
>   		xa_unlock(&guc->context_lookup);
>   
> -		if (intel_context_is_pinned(ce))
> +		if (intel_context_is_pinned(ce) &&
> +		    !intel_context_is_child(ce))
>   			guc_cancel_context_requests(ce);
>   
>   		intel_context_put(ce);
> @@ -2067,6 +2092,8 @@ static struct i915_sw_fence *guc_context_block(struct intel_context *ce)
>   	u16 guc_id;
>   	bool enabled;
>   
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
> +
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   
>   	incr_context_blocked(ce);
> @@ -2121,6 +2148,7 @@ static void guc_context_unblock(struct intel_context *ce)
>   	bool enable;
>   
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(context_enabled(ce));
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
>   
> @@ -2147,11 +2175,14 @@ static void guc_context_unblock(struct intel_context *ce)
>   static void guc_context_cancel_request(struct intel_context *ce,
>   				       struct i915_request *rq)
>   {
> +	struct intel_context *block_context =
> +		request_to_scheduling_context(rq);
> +
>   	if (i915_sw_fence_signaled(&rq->submit)) {
>   		struct i915_sw_fence *fence;
>   
>   		intel_context_get(ce);
> -		fence = guc_context_block(ce);
> +		fence = guc_context_block(block_context);
>   		i915_sw_fence_wait(fence);
>   		if (!i915_request_completed(rq)) {
>   			__i915_request_skip(rq);
> @@ -2165,7 +2196,7 @@ static void guc_context_cancel_request(struct intel_context *ce,
>   		 */
>   		flush_work(&ce_to_guc(ce)->ct.requests.worker);
>   
> -		guc_context_unblock(ce);
> +		guc_context_unblock(block_context);
>   		intel_context_put(ce);
>   	}
>   }
> @@ -2191,6 +2222,8 @@ static void guc_context_ban(struct intel_context *ce, struct i915_request *rq)
>   	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
> +
>   	guc_flush_submissions(guc);
>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-08 17:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-04 22:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/26] Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/26] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC guc_id allocation under submission state sub-struct Matthew Brost
2021-10-07  3:06   ` John Harrison
2021-10-07 15:05     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 18:13       ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/26] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost
2021-10-07  3:37   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08  1:28     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 18:23     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/26] drm/i915/guc: Take engine PM when a context is pinned with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-07  3:45   ` John Harrison
2021-10-07 15:19     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 18:15       ` John Harrison
2021-10-08  1:23         ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/26] drm/i915/guc: Don't call switch_to_kernel_context " Matthew Brost
2021-10-07  3:49   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/26] drm/i915: Add logical engine mapping Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:03   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/26] drm/i915: Expose logical engine instance to user Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/26] drm/i915/guc: Introduce context parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:35   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 18:33     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/26] drm/i915/guc: Add multi-lrc context registration Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 19:50   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08  1:31     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:20     ` John Harrison
2021-10-08 17:29       ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/26] drm/i915/guc: Ensure GuC schedule operations do not operate on child contexts Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 20:23   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/26] drm/i915/guc: Assign contexts in parent-child relationship consecutive guc_ids Matthew Brost
2021-10-07 22:03   ` John Harrison
2021-10-08  1:21     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 16:40       ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 18:03         ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:11           ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement parallel context pin / unpin functions Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc submission Matthew Brost
2021-10-05  7:55   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-05 10:37   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-08 17:20   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 18:24     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/26] drm/i915/guc: Insert submit fences between requests in parent-child relationship Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement multi-lrc reset Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:39   ` John Harrison [this message]
2021-10-08 17:56     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/26] drm/i915/guc: Update debugfs for GuC multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:46   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/26] drm/i915: Fix bug in user proto-context creation that leaked contexts Matthew Brost
2021-10-08 17:49   ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/26] drm/i915/guc: Connect UAPI to GuC multi-lrc interface Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 22:09   ` John Harrison
2021-10-11 22:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/26] drm/i915/doc: Update parallel submit doc to point to i915_drm.h Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/26] drm/i915/guc: Add basic GuC multi-lrc selftest Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/26] drm/i915/guc: Implement no mid batch preemption for multi-lrc Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 23:32   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  1:52     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/26] drm/i915: Multi-BB execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-05  8:31   ` kernel test robot
2021-10-05 17:02   ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-06 20:46   ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 21:22   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:37     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/26] drm/i915/guc: Handle errors in multi-lrc requests Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 21:56   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:18     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/26] drm/i915: Make request conflict tracking understand parallel submits Matthew Brost
2021-10-12 22:08   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:35       ` John Harrison
2021-10-13 17:51     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:25       ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/26] drm/i915: Update I915_GEM_BUSY IOCTL to understand composite fences Matthew Brost
2021-10-11 22:15   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-10-12  7:53   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-10-12 18:31     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/26] drm/i915: Enable multi-bb execbuf Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/26] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf (rev4) Patchwork
2021-10-12 22:15   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:15     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-13 19:24       ` John Harrison
2021-10-04 22:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-04 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-10-12 22:15   ` John Harrison
2021-10-13  0:12     ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-04 22:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-05  1:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Parallel submission aka multi-bb execbuf (rev5) Patchwork
2021-10-05  1:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-10-05  1:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-10-05  2:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-10-12 18:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/26] drm/i915/guc: Take GT PM ref when deregistering context Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d816209-7c88-8059-ff04-0cb7559f2c2f@intel.com \
    --to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox