public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/dsc/mtl: Add support for fractional bpp
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:36:03 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230913060606.1105349-6-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230913060606.1105349-1-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>

From: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>

Consider the fractional bpp while reading the qp values.

v2: Use helpers for fractional, integral bits of bits_per_pixel. (Suraj)

Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c    |  3 ---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c     | 25 +++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c
index 543cdc46aa1d..600c815e37e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_qp_tables.c
@@ -34,9 +34,6 @@
  * These qp tables are as per the C model
  * and it has the rows pointing to bpps which increment
  * in steps of 0.5
- * We do not support fractional bpps as of today,
- * hence we would skip the fractional bpps during
- * our references for qp calclulations.
  */
 static const u8 rc_range_minqp444_8bpc[DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES][RC_RANGE_QP444_8BPC_MAX_NUM_BPP] = {
 	{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
index 1bd9391a6f5a..2c19078fbce8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ intel_vdsc_set_min_max_qp(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg, int buf,
 static void
 calculate_rc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg)
 {
+	int bpp = intel_fractional_bpp_from_x16(vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel);
 	int bpc = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_component;
-	int bpp = vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel >> 4;
 	int qp_bpc_modifier = (bpc - 8) * 2;
 	int uncompressed_bpg_rate;
 	int first_line_bpg_offset;
@@ -149,7 +149,13 @@ calculate_rc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg)
 		static const s8 ofs_und8[] = {
 			10, 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -10, -12, -12, -12
 		};
-
+		/*
+		 * For 420 format since bits_per_pixel (bpp) is set to target bpp * 2,
+		 * QP table values for target bpp 4.0 to 4.4375 (rounded to 4.0) are
+		 * actually for bpp 8 to 8.875 (rounded to 4.0 * 2 i.e 8).
+		 * Similarly values for target bpp 4.5 to 4.8375 (rounded to 4.5)
+		 * are for bpp 9 to 9.875 (rounded to 4.5 * 2 i.e 9), and so on.
+		 */
 		bpp_i  = bpp - 8;
 		for (buf_i = 0; buf_i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; buf_i++) {
 			u8 range_bpg_offset;
@@ -179,6 +185,9 @@ calculate_rc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg)
 				range_bpg_offset & DSC_RANGE_BPG_OFFSET_MASK;
 		}
 	} else {
+		/* fractional bpp part * 10000 (for precision up to 4 decimal places) */
+		int fractional_bits = intel_fractional_bpp_decimal(vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel);
+
 		static const s8 ofs_und6[] = {
 			0, -2, -2, -4, -6, -6, -8, -8, -8, -10, -10, -12, -12, -12, -12
 		};
@@ -192,7 +201,14 @@ calculate_rc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *vdsc_cfg)
 			10, 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -10, -12, -12, -12
 		};
 
-		bpp_i  = (2 * (bpp - 6));
+		/*
+		 * QP table rows have values in increment of 0.5.
+		 * So 6.0 bpp to 6.4375 will have index 0, 6.5 to 6.9375 will have index 1,
+		 * and so on.
+		 * 0.5 fractional part with 4 decimal precision becomes 5000
+		 */
+		bpp_i  = ((bpp - 6) + (fractional_bits < 5000 ? 0 : 1));
+
 		for (buf_i = 0; buf_i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; buf_i++) {
 			u8 range_bpg_offset;
 
@@ -280,8 +296,7 @@ int intel_dsc_compute_params(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
 	/* Gen 11 does not support VBR */
 	vdsc_cfg->vbr_enable = false;
 
-	/* Gen 11 only supports integral values of bpp */
-	vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel = compressed_bpp << 4;
+	vdsc_cfg->bits_per_pixel = pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp_x16;
 
 	/*
 	 * According to DSC 1.2 specs in Section 4.1 if native_420 is set
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-13  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13  6:05 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Add DSC fractional bpp support Mitul Golani
2023-09-13  6:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/display/dp: Add helper function to get DSC bpp prescision Mitul Golani
2023-09-13  6:14   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2023-09-21  7:41   ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-22 12:05     ` Maxime Ripard
2023-09-22 14:39   ` [Intel-gfx] [1/8] " Sui Jingfeng
2023-09-13  6:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/display: Store compressed bpp in U6.4 format Mitul Golani
2023-09-22 16:02   ` [Intel-gfx] [2/8] " Sui Jingfeng
2023-09-13  6:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/display: Consider fractional vdsc bpp while computing m_n values Mitul Golani
2023-09-22 15:12   ` [Intel-gfx] [3/8] " Sui Jingfeng
2023-09-13  6:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/audio : Consider fractional vdsc bpp while computing tu_data Mitul Golani
2023-09-13  6:06 ` Mitul Golani [this message]
2023-09-13  6:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/dp: Iterate over output bpp with fractional step size Mitul Golani
2023-09-13  6:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/dsc: Add debugfs entry to validate DSC fractional bpp Mitul Golani
2023-09-21  8:00   ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-21 11:53     ` Sharma, Swati2
2023-09-21 12:14       ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-21 12:59         ` Sharma, Swati2
2023-09-22 12:28           ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-22 16:03   ` [Intel-gfx] [7/8] " Sui Jingfeng
2023-09-13  6:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/dsc: Allow DSC only with fractional bpp when forced from debugfs Mitul Golani
2023-09-13  6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add DSC fractional bpp support (rev7) Patchwork
2023-09-13  6:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-09-13  6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-13  8:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-20  4:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-22 12:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Add DSC fractional bpp support Imre Deak
2023-09-27 15:22   ` Imre Deak
2023-09-27 16:36     ` Sharma, Swati2
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-09-29  7:13 Mitul Golani
2023-09-29  7:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/dsc/mtl: Add support for fractional bpp Mitul Golani
2023-09-26  8:23 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Add DSC fractional bpp support Mitul Golani
2023-09-26  8:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/dsc/mtl: Add support for fractional bpp Mitul Golani
2023-09-12 16:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Add DSC fractional bpp support Mitul Golani
2023-09-12 16:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/dsc/mtl: Add support for fractional bpp Mitul Golani
2023-09-11  5:05 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] Add DSC fractional bpp support Mitul Golani
2023-09-11  5:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/dsc/mtl: Add support for fractional bpp Mitul Golani
2023-09-11  9:28   ` Kandpal, Suraj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230913060606.1105349-6-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
    --to=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox