public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Simplify DPLL state checker calling convention
Date: Wed,  4 Oct 2023 18:55:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231004155607.7719-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004155607.7719-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Make life simpler by just passing in the atomic state + crtc
instead of plumbing in all kinds of crtc states.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c      | 14 +++++++++-----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h      |  7 +++----
 .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c    |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index 237cfc8780a4..399653a20f98 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -4512,11 +4512,14 @@ verify_single_dpll_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 			"pll hw state mismatch\n");
 }
 
-void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
-				    const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
-				    const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
+void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
+				    struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
+	const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
+		intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
+	const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state =
+		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
 
 	if (new_crtc_state->shared_dpll)
 		verify_single_dpll_state(i915, new_crtc_state->shared_dpll,
@@ -4536,8 +4539,9 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 	}
 }
 
-void intel_shared_dpll_verify_disabled(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+void intel_shared_dpll_verify_disabled(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 {
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(state->base.dev);
 	struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
 	int i;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
index e184680606e9..dd4796a61751 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
@@ -369,9 +369,8 @@ void intel_dpll_dump_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 enum intel_dpll_id icl_tc_port_to_pll_id(enum tc_port tc_port);
 bool intel_dpll_is_combophy(enum intel_dpll_id id);
 
-void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
-				    const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
-				    const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state);
-void intel_shared_dpll_verify_disabled(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
+void intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
+				    struct intel_crtc *crtc);
+void intel_shared_dpll_verify_disabled(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
 
 #endif /* _INTEL_DPLL_MGR_H_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
index 92b55b4fb74e..47d45ba1e707 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_verify.c
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void intel_modeset_verify_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 	intel_wm_state_verify(crtc, new_crtc_state);
 	verify_connector_state(state, crtc);
 	verify_crtc_state(state, crtc);
-	intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(crtc, old_crtc_state, new_crtc_state);
+	intel_shared_dpll_state_verify(state, crtc);
 	intel_mpllb_state_verify(state, new_crtc_state);
 	intel_c10pll_state_verify(state, new_crtc_state);
 }
@@ -246,5 +246,5 @@ void intel_modeset_verify_disabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 {
 	verify_encoder_state(dev_priv, state);
 	verify_connector_state(state, NULL);
-	intel_shared_dpll_verify_disabled(dev_priv);
+	intel_shared_dpll_verify_disabled(state);
 }
-- 
2.41.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-04 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-04 15:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: Display state checker cleanup Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/psr: Unify PSR pre/post plane update hooks Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915: Stop clobbering old crtc state during state check Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915: Constify the crtc states in the DPLL checker Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:55 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2023-10-04 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915: Constify watermark state checker Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915: Simplify watermark state checker calling convention Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 16:57   ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-04 17:18     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-10-05 12:27   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2023-10-05 13:08     ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-04 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915: Constify the snps/c10x PLL state checkers Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915: Simplify snps/c10x DPLL state checker calling convetion Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915: Constify remainder of the state checker Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915: Simplify the state checker calling convetions Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915: s/pipe_config/crtc_state/ in the state checker Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: s/dev_priv/i915/ " Ville Syrjala
2023-10-04 16:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915: Display state checker cleanup Jani Nikula
2023-10-04 22:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2023-10-04 22:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-10-04 23:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-10-05  3:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Display state checker cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2023-10-05  3:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-10-05  3:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-10-05 23:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Display state checker cleanup (rev3) Patchwork
2023-10-05 23:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-10-05 23:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-10-06 13:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231004155607.7719-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox