From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/icl: Use revid->stepping tables
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:23:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23582fef556cc2c58cdf5fd9766d9466fa9cef40.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710033724.2459367-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
On Fri, 2021-07-09 at 20:37 -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> Switch ICL to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
> platforms going forward. While we're at it, let's include some
> additional steppings that have popped up, even if we don't yet have any
> workarounds tied to those steppings (we probably need to audit our
> workaround list soon to see if any of the bounds have moved or if new
> workarounds have appeared).
>
> Note that the current bspec table is missing information about how to
> map PCI revision ID to GT/display steppings; it only provides an SoC
> stepping. The mapping to GT/display steppings (which aren't always the
> same as the SoC stepping) used to be in the bspec, but was apparently
> dropped during an update in Nov 2019; I've made my changes here based on
> an older bspec snapshot that still had the necessary information. We've
> requested that the missing information be restored.
>
> I'm only including the production revids in the table here since we're
> past the point at which we usually stop trying to support pre-production
> hardware. An appropriate check is added to
> intel_detect_preproduction_hw() to print an error and taint the kernel
> just in case someone still tries to load the driver on old
> pre-production hardware.
>
> v2:
> - Drop pre-production steppings and add error/taint at startup when
> loading on pre-production hardware.
>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Bspec: 21141 # pre-Nov 2019 snapshot
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 12 ++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 10 ++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 7 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> index 6dfd564e078f..e2d8acb8c1c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> /* Wa_1604370585:icl (pre-prod)
> * Formerly known as WaPushConstantDereferenceHoldDisable
> */
> - if (IS_ICL_REVID(i915, ICL_REVID_A0, ICL_REVID_B0))
> + if (IS_ICL_GT_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> wa_masked_en(wal, GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2,
> PUSH_CONSTANT_DEREF_DISABLE);
>
> @@ -573,12 +573,12 @@ static void icl_ctx_workarounds_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> /* Wa_2006611047:icl (pre-prod)
> * Formerly known as WaDisableImprovedTdlClkGating
> */
> - if (IS_ICL_REVID(i915, ICL_REVID_A0, ICL_REVID_A0))
> + if (IS_ICL_GT_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_A0))
> wa_masked_en(wal, GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2,
> GEN11_TDL_CLOCK_GATING_FIX_DISABLE);
>
> /* Wa_2006665173:icl (pre-prod) */
> - if (IS_ICL_REVID(i915, ICL_REVID_A0, ICL_REVID_A0))
> + if (IS_ICL_GT_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_A0))
> wa_masked_en(wal, GEN11_COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN3,
> GEN11_BLEND_EMB_FIX_DISABLE_IN_RCC);
>
> @@ -1023,13 +1023,13 @@ icl_gt_workarounds_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> GAMW_ECO_DEV_CTX_RELOAD_DISABLE);
>
> /* Wa_1405779004:icl (pre-prod) */
> - if (IS_ICL_REVID(i915, ICL_REVID_A0, ICL_REVID_A0))
> + if (IS_ICL_GT_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_A0))
> wa_write_or(wal,
> SLICE_UNIT_LEVEL_CLKGATE,
> MSCUNIT_CLKGATE_DIS);
>
> /* Wa_1406838659:icl (pre-prod) */
> - if (IS_ICL_REVID(i915, ICL_REVID_A0, ICL_REVID_B0))
> + if (IS_ICL_GT_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> wa_write_or(wal,
> INF_UNIT_LEVEL_CLKGATE,
> CGPSF_CLKGATE_DIS);
> @@ -1725,7 +1725,7 @@ rcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> PMFLUSHDONE_LNEBLK);
>
> /* Wa_1406609255:icl (pre-prod) */
> - if (IS_ICL_REVID(i915, ICL_REVID_A0, ICL_REVID_B0))
> + if (IS_ICL_GT_STEP(i915, STEP_A0, STEP_B0))
> wa_write_or(wal,
> GEN7_SARCHKMD,
> GEN7_DISABLE_DEMAND_PREFETCH);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 90136995f5eb..c43b698bf0b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ static void intel_detect_preproduction_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> pre |= IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0xA;
> pre |= IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x1;
> pre |= IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x3;
> + pre |= IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x7;
>
> if (pre) {
> drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "This is a pre-production stepping. "
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index dac9ed2dfca5..d4f705f06c73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1529,14 +1529,8 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> #define IS_CNL_REVID(p, since, until) \
> (IS_CANNONLAKE(p) && IS_REVID(p, since, until))
>
> -#define ICL_REVID_A0 0x0
> -#define ICL_REVID_A2 0x1
> -#define ICL_REVID_B0 0x3
> -#define ICL_REVID_B2 0x4
> -#define ICL_REVID_C0 0x5
> -
> -#define IS_ICL_REVID(p, since, until) \
> - (IS_ICELAKE(p) && IS_REVID(p, since, until))
> +#define IS_ICL_GT_STEP(p, since, until) \
> + (IS_ICELAKE(p) && IS_GT_STEP(p, since, until))
>
> #define EHL_REVID_A0 0x0
> #define EHL_REVID_B0 0x1
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> index 7f8fe5e4c039..f8be464d1179 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ static const struct intel_step_info glk_revids[] = {
> [3] = { COMMON_STEPPING(B0) },
> };
>
> +static const struct intel_step_info icl_revids[] = {
> + [7] = { COMMON_STEPPING(D0) },
> +};
> +
> static const struct intel_step_info tgl_uy_revids[] = {
> [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
> [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_C0 },
> @@ -100,6 +104,9 @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> } else if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
> revids = tgl_revids;
> size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_revids);
> + } else if (IS_ICELAKE(i915)) {
> + revids = icl_revids;
> + size = ARRAY_SIZE(icl_revids);
> } else if (IS_GEMINILAKE(i915)) {
> revids = glk_revids;
> size = ARRAY_SIZE(glk_revids);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 3:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Matt Roper
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids Matt Roper
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:20 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:03 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:51 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/kbl: Drop pre-production revision from stepping table Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:22 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:04 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915/glk: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 21:11 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/icl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:23 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2021-07-13 19:57 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-13 19:59 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 20:02 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915/jsl_ehl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:25 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 16:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 16:56 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915/rkl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:51 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-12 22:56 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:08 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915/dg1: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:09 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:33 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:55 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915/icl: Drop workarounds that only apply to pre-production steppings Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:13 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-10 4:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-10 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23582fef556cc2c58cdf5fd9766d9466fa9cef40.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox