From: "Srivatsa, Anusha" <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
To: "Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/kbl: Drop pre-production revision from stepping table
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:22:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560124f42d08400496d9356e43278bf8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710033724.2459367-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 8:37 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/kbl: Drop pre-production revision from
> stepping table
>
> We're long past the point where we need to care about pre-production
> hardware, and we already warn the user and taint the kernel if we detect the
> driver is being loaded on pre-production hardware.
>
> Bspec: 18329
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> index 69c928b046e8..8987453aa172 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ static const struct intel_step_info skl_revids[] = { };
>
> static const struct intel_step_info kbl_revids[] = {
> - [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
> [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
> [2] = { .gt_step = STEP_C0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
> [3] = { .gt_step = STEP_D0, .display_step = STEP_B0 },
> --
> 2.25.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-13 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 3:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Matt Roper
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids Matt Roper
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:20 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:03 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:51 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/kbl: Drop pre-production revision from stepping table Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:22 ` Srivatsa, Anusha [this message]
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:04 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915/glk: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 21:11 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/icl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:23 ` Souza, Jose
2021-07-13 19:57 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-13 19:59 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 20:02 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915/jsl_ehl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:25 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 16:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 16:56 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915/rkl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:51 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-12 22:56 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:08 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915/dg1: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:09 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:33 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:55 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915/icl: Drop workarounds that only apply to pre-production steppings Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:13 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-10 4:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-10 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560124f42d08400496d9356e43278bf8@intel.com \
--to=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox