public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa, Anusha" <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
To: "Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 17:20:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28e06fdeb8ed4094822859b697d19023@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710033724.2459367-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 8:37 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use
> direct revid comparison
> 
> Although we're converting our workarounds to use a revid->stepping lookup
> table, the function that detects pre-production hardware should continue to
> compare against PCI revision ID values directly.  These are listed in the bspec
> as integers, so it's easier to confirm their correctness if we just use an integer
> literal rather than a symbolic name anyway.
> 
> Bspec: 13620, 19131, 13626, 18329
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index 30d8cd8c69b1..90136995f5eb
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -271,10 +271,10 @@ static void intel_detect_preproduction_hw(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	bool pre = false;
> 
>  	pre |= IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv);
> -	pre |= IS_SKL_REVID(dev_priv, 0, SKL_REVID_F0);
> -	pre |= IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, 0, BXT_REVID_B_LAST);
> -	pre |= IS_KBL_GT_STEP(dev_priv, 0, STEP_A0);
> -	pre |= IS_GLK_REVID(dev_priv, 0, GLK_REVID_A2);
> +	pre |= IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x6;
> +	pre |= IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0xA;
> +	pre |= IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x1;
> +	pre |= IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) && INTEL_REVID(dev_priv) < 0x3;
> 
>  	if (pre) {
>  		drm_err(&dev_priv->drm, "This is a pre-production stepping.
> "
> --
> 2.25.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-13 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-10  3:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Matt Roper
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids Matt Roper
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:20   ` Srivatsa, Anusha [this message]
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:03   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:51   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/kbl: Drop pre-production revision from stepping table Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:22   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:04   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915/glk: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 21:11   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/icl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:23   ` Souza, Jose
2021-07-13 19:57   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-13 19:59     ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 20:02       ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915/jsl_ehl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:25   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 16:14     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 16:56       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915/rkl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:51   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-12 22:56     ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:08       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915/dg1: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:09   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:29     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:33       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:55   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915/icl: Drop workarounds that only apply to pre-production steppings Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:13   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-10  4:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-10 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28e06fdeb8ed4094822859b697d19023@intel.com \
    --to=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox