public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa, Anusha" <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
To: "Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 23:04:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cce1d474f771486989d80b68a7f499c7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710033724.2459367-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 8:37 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables
> 
> Switch BXT to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
> platforms going forward.  Note that the REVID macros we had before
> weren't being used anywhere in the code and weren't even correct; the
> table values come from the bspec (and omits all the placeholder and
> preproduction revisions).
> 
> Although nothing in the code is using the data from this table at the moment,
> we expect some upcoming DMC patches to start utilizing it.
> 
> Bspec: 13620
> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Thanks for the patch,

Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h   |  9 ---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index f30499ed6787..afb159f2a658
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1517,15 +1517,6 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private
> *i915,
> 
>  #define IS_SKL_GT_STEP(p, since, until) (IS_SKYLAKE(p) && IS_GT_STEP(p,
> since, until))
> 
> -#define BXT_REVID_A0		0x0
> -#define BXT_REVID_A1		0x1
> -#define BXT_REVID_B0		0x3
> -#define BXT_REVID_B_LAST	0x8
> -#define BXT_REVID_C0		0x9
> -
> -#define IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, since, until) \
> -	(IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && IS_REVID(dev_priv, since, until))
> -
>  #define IS_KBL_GT_STEP(dev_priv, since, until) \
>  	(IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && IS_GT_STEP(dev_priv, since, until))
> #define IS_KBL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, since, until) \ diff --git
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> index 8987453aa172..41e3904ae6e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,13 @@ static const struct intel_step_info kbl_revids[] = {
>  	[7] = { .gt_step = STEP_G0, .display_step = STEP_C0 },  };
> 
> +static const struct intel_step_info bxt_revids[] = {
> +	[0xA] = { COMMON_STEPPING(C0) },
> +	[0xB] = { COMMON_STEPPING(C0) },
> +	[0xC] = { COMMON_STEPPING(D0) },
> +	[0xD] = { COMMON_STEPPING(E0) },
> +};
> +
>  static const struct intel_step_info tgl_uy_revids[] = {
>  	[0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
>  	[1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, @@ -89,6 +96,9
> @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  	} else if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
>  		revids = tgl_revids;
>  		size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_revids);
> +	} else if (IS_BROXTON(i915)) {
> +		revids = bxt_revids;
> +		size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_revids);
>  	} else if (IS_KABYLAKE(i915)) {
>  		revids = kbl_revids;
>  		size = ARRAY_SIZE(kbl_revids);
> --
> 2.25.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-12 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-10  3:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Matt Roper
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids Matt Roper
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:20   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:03   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:51   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/kbl: Drop pre-production revision from stepping table Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:22   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:04   ` Srivatsa, Anusha [this message]
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915/glk: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 21:11   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/icl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:23   ` Souza, Jose
2021-07-13 19:57   ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-13 19:59     ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 20:02       ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915/jsl_ehl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:25   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 16:14     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 16:56       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915/rkl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:51   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-12 22:56     ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:08       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915/dg1: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:09   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:29     ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:33       ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:55   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915/icl: Drop workarounds that only apply to pre-production steppings Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:13   ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10  3:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-10  4:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-10 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cce1d474f771486989d80b68a7f499c7@intel.com \
    --to=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox