From: "Srivatsa, Anusha" <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
To: "Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 23:04:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cce1d474f771486989d80b68a7f499c7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710033724.2459367-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 8:37 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>; Roper, Matthew D
> <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables
>
> Switch BXT to use a revid->stepping table as we're trying to do on all
> platforms going forward. Note that the REVID macros we had before
> weren't being used anywhere in the code and weren't even correct; the
> table values come from the bspec (and omits all the placeholder and
> preproduction revisions).
>
> Although nothing in the code is using the data from this table at the moment,
> we expect some upcoming DMC patches to start utilizing it.
>
> Bspec: 13620
> Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Thanks for the patch,
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 ---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index f30499ed6787..afb159f2a658
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1517,15 +1517,6 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private
> *i915,
>
> #define IS_SKL_GT_STEP(p, since, until) (IS_SKYLAKE(p) && IS_GT_STEP(p,
> since, until))
>
> -#define BXT_REVID_A0 0x0
> -#define BXT_REVID_A1 0x1
> -#define BXT_REVID_B0 0x3
> -#define BXT_REVID_B_LAST 0x8
> -#define BXT_REVID_C0 0x9
> -
> -#define IS_BXT_REVID(dev_priv, since, until) \
> - (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) && IS_REVID(dev_priv, since, until))
> -
> #define IS_KBL_GT_STEP(dev_priv, since, until) \
> (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) && IS_GT_STEP(dev_priv, since, until))
> #define IS_KBL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, since, until) \ diff --git
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> index 8987453aa172..41e3904ae6e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_step.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,13 @@ static const struct intel_step_info kbl_revids[] = {
> [7] = { .gt_step = STEP_G0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, };
>
> +static const struct intel_step_info bxt_revids[] = {
> + [0xA] = { COMMON_STEPPING(C0) },
> + [0xB] = { COMMON_STEPPING(C0) },
> + [0xC] = { COMMON_STEPPING(D0) },
> + [0xD] = { COMMON_STEPPING(E0) },
> +};
> +
> static const struct intel_step_info tgl_uy_revids[] = {
> [0] = { .gt_step = STEP_A0, .display_step = STEP_A0 },
> [1] = { .gt_step = STEP_B0, .display_step = STEP_C0 }, @@ -89,6 +96,9
> @@ void intel_step_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> } else if (IS_TIGERLAKE(i915)) {
> revids = tgl_revids;
> size = ARRAY_SIZE(tgl_revids);
> + } else if (IS_BROXTON(i915)) {
> + revids = bxt_revids;
> + size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_revids);
> } else if (IS_KABYLAKE(i915)) {
> revids = kbl_revids;
> size = ARRAY_SIZE(kbl_revids);
> --
> 2.25.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 3:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/12] Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup Matt Roper
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915/step: s/<platform>_revid_tbl/<platform>_revids Matt Roper
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915: Make pre-production detection use direct revid comparison Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:20 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915/skl: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:03 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:51 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/kbl: Drop pre-production revision from stepping table Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:22 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/bxt: Use revid->stepping tables Matt Roper
2021-07-12 23:04 ` Srivatsa, Anusha [this message]
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915/glk: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 21:11 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/icl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 19:23 ` Souza, Jose
2021-07-13 19:57 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-13 19:59 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 20:02 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915/jsl_ehl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:25 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 16:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 16:56 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915/rkl: " Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:51 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-12 22:56 ` Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:08 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915/dg1: " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:09 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-13 17:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 " Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:33 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915/cnl: Drop all workarounds Matt Roper
2021-07-12 22:55 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915/icl: Drop workarounds that only apply to pre-production steppings Matt Roper
2021-07-13 17:13 ` Srivatsa, Anusha
2021-07-10 3:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-10 4:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-10 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Minor revid/stepping and workaround cleanup (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-13 19:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cce1d474f771486989d80b68a7f499c7@intel.com \
--to=anusha.srivatsa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox