Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/16] drm/i915/pxp: Define PXP component interface

[Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>]

On 29.03.2021 00:56, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> This will be used for communication between the i915 driver and the mei
> one. Defining it in a stand-alone patch to avoid circualr dependedencies

typos

> between the patches modifying the 2 drivers.
> 
> Split out from an original patch from  Huang, Sean Z
> 
> v2: rename the component struct (Rodrigo)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/drm/i915_component.h         |  1 +
>  include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h
> 
> diff --git a/include/drm/i915_component.h b/include/drm/i915_component.h
> index 55c3b123581b..c1e2a43d2d1e 100644
> --- a/include/drm/i915_component.h
> +++ b/include/drm/i915_component.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  enum i915_component_type {
>  	I915_COMPONENT_AUDIO = 1,
>  	I915_COMPONENT_HDCP,
> +	I915_COMPONENT_PXP
>  };
>  
>  /* MAX_PORT is the number of port
> diff --git a/include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h b/include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..09b8389152af
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/drm/i915_pxp_tee_interface.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2020 Intel Corporation
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Vitaly Lubart <vitaly.lubart@intel.com>

shouldn't be at least on cc: ?

> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _I915_PXP_TEE_INTERFACE_H_
> +#define _I915_PXP_TEE_INTERFACE_H_
> +
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i915_pxp_component_ops - ops for PXP services.
> + * @owner: Module providing the ops
> + * @send: sends data to PXP
> + * @receive: receives data from PXP
> + */
> +struct i915_pxp_component_ops {
> +	/**
> +	 * @owner: owner of the module provding the ops

typo

> +	 */
> +	struct module *owner;

hmm, usually ops structs have only function pointers, why do we need
owner here ? and are you sure is it a right place if still needed ?

> +
> +	int (*send)(struct device *dev, const void *message, size_t size);
> +	int (*recv)(struct device *dev, void *buffer, size_t size);
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct i915_pxp_component - Used for communication between i915 and TEE
> + * drivers for the PXP services
> + * @tee_dev: device that provide the PXP service from TEE Bus.
> + * @pxp_ops: Ops implemented by TEE driver, used by i915 driver.
> + */
> +struct i915_pxp_component {
> +	struct device *tee_dev;
> +	const struct i915_pxp_component_ops *ops;
> +
> +	/* To protect the above members. */
> +	struct mutex mutex;
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* _I915_TEE_PXP_INTERFACE_H_ */
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx