Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Daniele Ceraolo Spurio" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@intel.com>,
	uma.shankar@intel.com
Cc: Gaurav Kumar <kumar.gaurav@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Huang Sean Z <sean.z.huang@intel.com>,
	Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 14/16] drm/i915/pxp: Add plane decryption support
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:48:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH7pqNrpkhPRkCS8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210328225709.18541-15-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:57:06PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
> From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> 
> Add support to enable/disable PLANE_SURF Decryption Request bit.
> It requires only to enable plane decryption support when following
> condition met.
> 1. PXP session is enabled.
> 2. Buffer object is protected.
> 
> v2:
> - Used gen fb obj user_flags instead gem_object_metadata. [Krishna]
> 
> v3:
> - intel_pxp_gem_object_status() API changes.
> 
> v4: use intel_pxp_is_active (Daniele)
> v5: rebase and use the new protected object status checker (Daniele)
> 
> Cc: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
> Cc: Huang Sean Z <sean.z.huang@intel.com>
> Cc: Gaurav Kumar <kumar.gaurav@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h                    |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> index c6d7b6c054b5..b21bfb5be876 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include "intel_sprite.h"
>  #include "skl_scaler.h"
>  #include "skl_universal_plane.h"
> +#include "pxp/intel_pxp.h"
>  
>  static const u32 skl_plane_formats[] = {
>  	DRM_FORMAT_C8,
> @@ -971,7 +972,7 @@ skl_program_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  	u8 alpha = plane_state->hw.alpha >> 8;
>  	u32 plane_color_ctl = 0, aux_dist = 0;
>  	unsigned long irqflags;
> -	u32 keymsk, keymax;
> +	u32 keymsk, keymax, plane_surf;
>  	u32 plane_ctl = plane_state->ctl;
>  
>  	plane_ctl |= skl_plane_ctl_crtc(crtc_state);
> @@ -1051,8 +1052,15 @@ skl_program_plane(struct intel_plane *plane,
>  	 * the control register just before the surface register.
>  	 */
>  	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), plane_ctl);
> -	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id),
> -			  intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state) + surf_addr);
> +	plane_surf = intel_plane_ggtt_offset(plane_state) + surf_addr;
> +
> +	if (intel_pxp_is_active(&dev_priv->gt.pxp) &&
> +	    i915_gem_object_has_valid_protection(intel_fb_obj(fb)))
> +		plane_surf |= PLANE_SURF_DECRYPTION_ENABLED;
> +	else
> +		plane_surf &= ~PLANE_SURF_DECRYPTION_ENABLED;

This part looks right. But what should we do about the async_flip path?
Jani? Ville? Uma? thoughts?

> +
> +	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), plane_surf);
>  
>  	if (plane_state->scaler_id >= 0)
>  		skl_program_plane_scaler(plane, crtc_state, plane_state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 1fe42f4a4e4b..a0313d718905 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -7234,6 +7234,7 @@ enum {
>  #define _PLANE_SURF_3(pipe)	_PIPE(pipe, _PLANE_SURF_3_A, _PLANE_SURF_3_B)
>  #define PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane)	\
>  	_MMIO_PLANE(plane, _PLANE_SURF_1(pipe), _PLANE_SURF_2(pipe))
> +#define   PLANE_SURF_DECRYPTION_ENABLED		REG_BIT(2)
>  
>  #define _PLANE_OFFSET_1_B			0x711a4
>  #define _PLANE_OFFSET_2_B			0x712a4
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-28 22:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/16] Introduce Intel PXP Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-03-28 22:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/16] drm/i915/pxp: Define PXP component interface Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-03-29 13:55   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-04-08 21:38     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/16] mei: pxp: export pavp client to me client bus Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-03-29 14:15   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-03-28 22:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/16] drm/i915/pxp: define PXP device flag and kconfig Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-03-28 22:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/16] drm/i915/pxp: allocate a vcs context for pxp usage Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-08 21:47   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/16] drm/i915/pxp: Implement funcs to create the TEE channel Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-08 21:50   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/16] drm/i915/pxp: set KCR reg init Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-08 21:52   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/16] drm/i915/pxp: Create the arbitrary session after boot Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-08 22:01   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/16] drm/i915/pxp: Implement arb session teardown Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-09  9:16   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/16] drm/i915/pxp: Implement PXP irq handler Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-09  9:38   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/16] drm/i915/pxp: Enable PXP power management Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-20 14:31   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/16] drm/i915/pxp: interface for marking contexts as using protected content Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-01 12:06   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2021-04-15 17:20   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-20 14:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/16] drm/i915/uapi: introduce drm_i915_gem_create_ext Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-03-30  9:26   ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-15 17:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/16] drm/i915/pxp: User interface for Protected buffer Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-01 12:05   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2021-04-01 20:45     ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-20 14:40       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 14/16] drm/i915/pxp: Add plane decryption support Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-20 14:48   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2021-04-20 22:00     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-27 10:43   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-04-27 18:55     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-28 11:25       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-04-28 12:03         ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-28 17:32           ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-28 20:04             ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-28 20:39               ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-30  6:56                 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-04-30 12:52                   ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-30  7:01       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 15/16] drm/i915/pxp: black pixels on pxp disabled Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-04-27 10:45   ` Anshuman Gupta
2021-04-27 18:55     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-04-30  7:12       ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-04-30 12:55         ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-05-07 18:42           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2021-05-14 13:41             ` Teres Alexis, Alan Previn
2021-03-28 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 16/16] drm/i915/pxp: enable PXP for integrated Gen12 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-03-28 23:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce Intel PXP (rev3) Patchwork
2021-03-28 23:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-03-28 23:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-03-29  0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-03-29  1:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-04-01 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/16] Introduce Intel PXP Lionel Landwerlin
2021-04-27 13:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Introduce Intel PXP (rev5) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YH7pqNrpkhPRkCS8@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com \
    --cc=kumar.gaurav@intel.com \
    --cc=sean.z.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox