From: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/display/adlp: Add new PSR2 workarounds
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4efdadcc-c8f5-cfdd-9b79-ce780920fb9b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210909230725.33735-2-jose.souza@intel.com>
On 9/10/21 2:07 AM, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Wa_16014451276 fixes the starting coordinate for PSR2 selective
> updates. CHICKEN_TRANS definition of the workaround bit has a wrong
> name based on workaround definition and HSD.
>
> Wa_14014971508 allows the screen to continue to be updated when
> coming back from DC5/DC6 and SF_SINGLE_FULL_FRAME bit is not kept
> set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
>
> Wa_16012604467 fixes underruns when exiting PSR2 when it is in one
> of its internal states.
>
> Wa_14014971508 is still in pending status in BSpec but by
> the time this is reviewed and ready to be merged it will be finalized.
>
> BSpec: 54369
> BSpec: 50054
> Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 36816abb3bcc0..92c0b2159559f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1086,6 +1086,12 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_de_write(dev_priv, reg, chicken);
> }
>
> + /* Wa_16014451276:adlp */
> + if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) &&
> + intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled)
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
> + D13_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY);
Depending on the capability of the PSR panel, the following setting may
not be necessary, could you add some comments such as "force enable
1-based X granularity on PSR2 VSC SDP"?
> +
> /*
> * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP and HPD also
> * mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other drivers that might block
> @@ -1131,6 +1137,11 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY_MASK,
> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY_VALUE(1));
> +
> + /* Wa_16012604467:adlp */
> + if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) && intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled)
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CLKGATE_DIS_MISC, 0,
> + CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS);
> }
>
> static bool psr_interrupt_error_check(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> @@ -1320,6 +1331,11 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY(intel_dp->psr.transcoder),
> TRANS_SET_CONTEXT_LATENCY_MASK, 0);
>
> + /* Wa_16012604467:adlp */
> + if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv) && intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled)
> + intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CLKGATE_DIS_MISC,
> + CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS, 0);
> +
> intel_snps_phy_update_psr_power_state(dev_priv, phy, false);
>
> /* Disable PSR on Sink */
> @@ -1488,8 +1504,13 @@ static void psr2_man_trk_ctl_calc(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> u32 val = PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE;
>
> if (full_update) {
> + /*
> + * Wa_14014971508:adlp
> + * SINGLE_FULL_FRAME bit is not hold in register so can not be
> + * restored by DMC, so using CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME to mimic that
> + */
> if (IS_ALDERLAKE_P(dev_priv))
> - val |= ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_SINGLE_FULL_FRAME;
> + val |= ADLP_PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME;
> else
> val |= PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SF_SINGLE_FULL_FRAME;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index c2853cc005ee6..0de2f7541da6c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -8235,6 +8235,7 @@ enum {
> #define VSC_DATA_SEL_SOFTWARE_CONTROL REG_BIT(25) /* GLK */
> #define FECSTALL_DIS_DPTSTREAM_DPTTG REG_BIT(23)
> #define DDI_TRAINING_OVERRIDE_ENABLE REG_BIT(19)
> +#define D13_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY REG_BIT(18)
The meaning of this macro is to set "force enable 1-based X granularity
on PSR2 VSC SDP" in Display 13.1 ADL, so the meaning of the macro may be
a little ambiguous.
> #define DDI_TRAINING_OVERRIDE_VALUE REG_BIT(18)
> #define DDIE_TRAINING_OVERRIDE_ENABLE REG_BIT(17) /* CHICKEN_TRANS_A only */
> #define DDIE_TRAINING_OVERRIDE_VALUE REG_BIT(16) /* CHICKEN_TRANS_A only */
> @@ -12789,4 +12790,7 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> #define CLKREQ_POLICY _MMIO(0x101038)
> #define CLKREQ_POLICY_MEM_UP_OVRD REG_BIT(1)
>
> +#define CLKGATE_DIS_MISC _MMIO(0x46534)
> +#define CLKGATE_DIS_MISC_DMASC_GATING_DIS REG_BIT(21)
> +
> #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-09 23:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/display/adlp: Fix PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SU_REGION_END_ADDR calculation José Roberto de Souza
2021-09-09 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/display/adlp: Add new PSR2 workarounds José Roberto de Souza
2021-09-10 13:38 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun [this message]
2021-09-10 16:29 ` Souza, Jose
2021-09-13 16:09 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2021-09-13 17:00 ` Souza, Jose
2021-09-14 12:39 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2021-09-09 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/display: Wait at least 2 frames before selective update José Roberto de Souza
2021-09-10 13:26 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2021-09-09 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/display/psr: Use drm damage helpers to calculate plane damaged area José Roberto de Souza
2021-09-13 16:03 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2021-09-13 16:45 ` Souza, Jose
2021-09-14 12:42 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2021-09-09 23:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915/display: Workaround cursor left overs with PSR2 selective fetch enabled José Roberto de Souza
2021-09-10 13:29 ` Gwan-gyeong Mun
2021-09-10 0:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [1/5] drm/i915/display/adlp: Fix PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_SU_REGION_END_ADDR calculation Patchwork
2021-09-10 0:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-10 2:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-10 13:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] " Gwan-gyeong Mun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4efdadcc-c8f5-cfdd-9b79-ce780920fb9b@intel.com \
--to=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox