From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 13:07:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871psym70j.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509042729.1152004-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Fri, 09 May 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Rename the macro for_each_shared_dpll to for_each_dpll since
> this loop will not necessarily be used for only shared
> dpll in future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_refclk.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index 8d0a1779dd19..3770ce9469d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> display->dpll.ref_clks.nssc,
> display->dpll.ref_clks.ssc);
>
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i) {
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i) {
> drm_printf(&p, "DPLL%i: %s, id: %i\n", pll->index,
> pll->info->name, pll->info->id);
> drm_printf(&p, " pipe_mask: 0x%x, active: 0x%x, on: %s\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 6b4eb230f4b3..9974fdb6eaeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -127,8 +127,8 @@ intel_atomic_duplicate_dpll_state(struct intel_display *display,
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> int i;
>
> - /* Copy shared dpll state */
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i)
> + /* Copy dpll state */
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i)
> dpll_state[pll->index] = pll->state;
> }
>
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ intel_get_shared_dpll_by_id(struct intel_display *display,
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> int i;
>
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i) {
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i) {
> if (pll->info->id == id)
> return pll;
> }
> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ intel_dpll_mask_all(struct intel_display *display)
> unsigned long dpll_mask = 0;
> int i;
>
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i) {
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i) {
> drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, dpll_mask & BIT(pll->info->id));
>
> dpll_mask |= BIT(pll->info->id);
> @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_swap_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> if (!state->dpll_set)
> return;
>
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i)
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i)
> swap(pll->state, dpll_state[pll->index]);
> }
>
> @@ -4542,7 +4542,7 @@ void intel_dpll_readout_hw_state(struct intel_display *display)
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> int i;
>
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i)
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i)
> readout_dpll_hw_state(display, pll);
> }
>
> @@ -4571,7 +4571,7 @@ void intel_dpll_sanitize_state(struct intel_display *display)
>
> intel_cx0_pll_power_save_wa(display);
>
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i)
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i)
> sanitize_dpll_state(display, pll);
> }
>
> @@ -4720,6 +4720,6 @@ void intel_shared_dpll_verify_disabled(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> int i;
>
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i)
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i)
> verify_single_dpll_state(display, pll, NULL, NULL);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> index fe6c676737bb..d93072486831 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> #include "intel_display_power.h"
> #include "intel_wakeref.h"
>
> -#define for_each_shared_dpll(__display, __pll, __i) \
> +#define for_each_dpll(__display, __pll, __i) \
> for ((__i) = 0; (__i) < (__display)->dpll.num_shared_dpll && \
> ((__pll) = &(__display)->dpll.shared_dplls[(__i)]) ; (__i)++)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_refclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_refclk.c
> index 693b90e3dfc3..8bec55deff9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_refclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_refclk.c
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static void ilk_init_pch_refclk(struct intel_display *display)
> }
>
> /* Check if any DPLLs are using the SSC source */
> - for_each_shared_dpll(display, pll, i) {
> + for_each_dpll(display, pll, i) {
> u32 temp;
>
> temp = intel_de_read(display, PCH_DPLL(pll->info->id));
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 4:27 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:04 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:05 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:13 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:00 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:17 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:02 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:19 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:22 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:24 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:27 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_[enable/disable]_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 3:19 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:31 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:27 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_<release/reserve>_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_compute_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_update_active_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-07 8:16 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-04-07 8:16 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871psym70j.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox