From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_compute_dpll
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 13:33:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zffmjcpr.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509042729.1152004-18-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Fri, 09 May 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Rename intel_compute_dpll to intel_dpll_compute in an
> effort to make sure all function names that are exported have
> the filename at start.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> index 6a0bb12eafc4..c15a9af53313 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static int hsw_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI))
> return 0;
>
> - ret = intel_compute_dplls(state, crtc, encoder);
> + ret = intel_dpll_compute(state, crtc, encoder);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ static int mtl_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - /* TODO: Do the readback via intel_compute_dplls() */
> + /* TODO: Do the readback via intel_dpll_compute() */
> crtc_state->port_clock = intel_cx0pll_calc_port_clock(encoder, &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.cx0pll);
>
> crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock = intel_crtc_dotclock(crtc_state);
> @@ -1394,7 +1394,7 @@ static int ilk_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> ilk_compute_dpll(crtc_state, &crtc_state->dpll,
> &crtc_state->dpll);
>
> - ret = intel_compute_dplls(state, crtc, NULL);
> + ret = intel_dpll_compute(state, crtc, NULL);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index 65dd8c3a3aed..05714e6fbad5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -4383,7 +4383,7 @@ void intel_dpll_init(struct intel_display *display)
> }
>
> /**
> - * intel_compute_dplls - compute DPLL state CRTC and encoder combination
> + * intel_dpll_compute - compute DPLL state CRTC and encoder combination
> * @state: atomic state
> * @crtc: CRTC to compute DPLLs for
> * @encoder: encoder
> @@ -4396,9 +4396,9 @@ void intel_dpll_init(struct intel_display *display)
> * Returns:
> * 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
> */
> -int intel_compute_dplls(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> +int intel_dpll_compute(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
> const struct intel_dpll_mgr *dpll_mgr = display->dpll.mgr;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> index 4f8074580582..c2658ad409e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> @@ -396,9 +396,9 @@ void assert_dpll(struct intel_display *display,
> bool state);
> #define assert_dpll_enabled(d, p) assert_dpll(d, p, true)
> #define assert_dpll_disabled(d, p) assert_dpll(d, p, false)
> -int intel_compute_dplls(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> - struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> +int intel_dpll_compute(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> int intel_dpll_reserve(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> struct intel_encoder *encoder);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 4:27 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:04 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:05 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:13 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:00 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:17 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:02 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:19 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:22 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:24 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:27 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_[enable/disable]_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 3:19 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:31 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:27 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_<release/reserve>_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_compute_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_update_active_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-07 8:16 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-04-07 8:16 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_compute_dpll Suraj Kandpal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zffmjcpr.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox