From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 13:22:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msbmkrrf.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509042729.1152004-10-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Fri, 09 May 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Change the arguments for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs to only
> accept crtc_state.
But that does not match the patch! You also add encoder parameter...
> This is because we really don't need those extra
> arguments everything can be derived from crtc_state and we need both
> intel_encoder and crtc_state for PLL enablement when DISPLAY_VER() >= 14
...and you mention it here too.
> which requires us to pass this crtc state if we want the future
> PLL framework to fit into the existing one and not use the intel_ddi
> hooks
>
> --v2
> -Rename global_dpll to dpll_global to keep consistency with filename
> [Jani/Ville]
>
> --v3
> -Just use intel_dpll [Jani]
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 100 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index f1b704f369f9..21080abc6d42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -69,9 +69,8 @@ struct intel_dpll_funcs {
> * Hook for enabling the pll, called from intel_enable_dpll() if
> * the pll is not already enabled.
> */
> - void (*enable)(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
> + void (*enable)(const struct intel_crtc_state *state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder);
You pass in NULL encoder. Why? What does it mean? The comment should
mention that. Or pass in the proper encoder always to reduce special
casing?
BR,
Jani.
>
> /*
> * Hook for disabling the pll, called from intel_disable_dpll()
> @@ -229,13 +228,15 @@ intel_tc_pll_enable_reg(struct intel_display *display,
> return MG_PLL_ENABLE(tc_port);
> }
>
> -static void _intel_enable_shared_dpll(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll)
> +static void _intel_enable_shared_dpll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> +
> if (pll->info->power_domain)
> pll->wakeref = intel_display_power_get(display, pll->info->power_domain);
>
> - pll->info->funcs->enable(display, pll, &pll->state.hw_state);
> + pll->info->funcs->enable(crtc_state, NULL);
> pll->on = true;
> }
>
> @@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ void intel_enable_dpll(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "enabling %s\n", pll->info->name);
>
> - _intel_enable_shared_dpll(display, pll);
> + _intel_enable_shared_dpll(crtc_state);
>
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&display->dpll.lock);
> @@ -561,11 +562,12 @@ static void ibx_assert_pch_refclk_enabled(struct intel_display *display)
> "PCH refclk assertion failure, should be active but is disabled\n");
> }
>
> -static void ibx_pch_dpll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void ibx_pch_dpll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct i9xx_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->i9xx;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> + const struct i9xx_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.i9xx;
> const enum intel_dpll_id id = pll->info->id;
>
> /* PCH refclock must be enabled first */
> @@ -691,11 +693,12 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_mgr pch_pll_mgr = {
> .compare_hw_state = ibx_compare_hw_state,
> };
>
> -static void hsw_ddi_wrpll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void hsw_ddi_wrpll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct hsw_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->hsw;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> + const struct hsw_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.hsw;
> const enum intel_dpll_id id = pll->info->id;
>
> intel_de_write(display, WRPLL_CTL(id), hw_state->wrpll);
> @@ -703,11 +706,11 @@ static void hsw_ddi_wrpll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> udelay(20);
> }
>
> -static void hsw_ddi_spll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void hsw_ddi_spll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct hsw_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->hsw;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + const struct hsw_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.hsw;
>
> intel_de_write(display, SPLL_CTL, hw_state->spll);
> intel_de_posting_read(display, SPLL_CTL);
> @@ -1284,9 +1287,8 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_funcs hsw_ddi_spll_funcs = {
> .get_freq = hsw_ddi_spll_get_freq,
> };
>
> -static void hsw_ddi_lcpll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *hw_state)
> +static void hsw_ddi_lcpll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> }
>
> @@ -1377,11 +1379,12 @@ static void skl_ddi_pll_write_ctrl1(struct intel_display *display,
> intel_de_posting_read(display, DPLL_CTRL1);
> }
>
> -static void skl_ddi_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void skl_ddi_pll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct skl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->skl;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> + const struct skl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.skl;
> const struct skl_dpll_regs *regs = skl_dpll_regs;
> const enum intel_dpll_id id = pll->info->id;
>
> @@ -1399,11 +1402,12 @@ static void skl_ddi_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> drm_err(display->drm, "DPLL %d not locked\n", id);
> }
>
> -static void skl_ddi_dpll0_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void skl_ddi_dpll0_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct skl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->skl;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> + const struct skl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.skl;
>
> skl_ddi_pll_write_ctrl1(display, pll, hw_state);
> }
> @@ -2037,11 +2041,12 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_mgr skl_pll_mgr = {
> .compare_hw_state = skl_compare_hw_state,
> };
>
> -static void bxt_ddi_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void bxt_ddi_pll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct bxt_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->bxt;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> + const struct bxt_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.bxt;
> enum port port = (enum port)pll->info->id; /* 1:1 port->PLL mapping */
> enum dpio_phy phy = DPIO_PHY0;
> enum dpio_channel ch = DPIO_CH0;
> @@ -3953,11 +3958,12 @@ static void adlp_cmtg_clock_gating_wa(struct intel_display *display, struct inte
> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Unexpected flags in TRANS_CMTG_CHICKEN: %08x\n", val);
> }
>
> -static void combo_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void combo_pll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct icl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->icl;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> + const struct icl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.icl;
> i915_reg_t enable_reg = intel_combo_pll_enable_reg(display, pll);
>
> icl_pll_power_enable(display, pll, enable_reg);
> @@ -3977,11 +3983,12 @@ static void combo_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> /* DVFS post sequence would be here. See the comment above. */
> }
>
> -static void tbt_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void tbt_pll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct icl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->icl;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> + const struct icl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.icl;
>
> icl_pll_power_enable(display, pll, TBT_PLL_ENABLE);
>
> @@ -3998,11 +4005,12 @@ static void tbt_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> /* DVFS post sequence would be here. See the comment above. */
> }
>
> -static void mg_pll_enable(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state)
> +static void mg_pll_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> - const struct icl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &dpll_hw_state->icl;
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> + struct intel_dpll *pll = crtc_state->intel_dpll;
> + const struct icl_dpll_hw_state *hw_state = &crtc_state->dpll_hw_state.icl;
> i915_reg_t enable_reg = intel_tc_pll_enable_reg(display, pll);
>
> icl_pll_power_enable(display, pll, enable_reg);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 4:27 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:04 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:05 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:13 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:00 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:17 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:02 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:19 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:22 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:24 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:27 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_[enable/disable]_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 3:19 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:31 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:27 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_<release/reserve>_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_compute_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_update_active_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-07 8:16 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-04-07 8:16 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msbmkrrf.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox