Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
@ 2023-01-13 13:06 Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2023-01-13 14:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy @ 2023-01-13 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx

According to spec, we should check if output_bpp * pixel_rate is less
than DDI clock * 72, if UHBR is used.

HSDES: 1406899791
BSPEC: 49259

v2: - Removed wrong comment(Rodrigo Vivi)
    - Added HSDES to the commit msg(Rodrigo Vivi)
    - Moved UHBR check to the MST specific code

v3: - Changed commit subject(Rodrigo Vivi)
    - Fixed the error message if check fails(Rodrigo Vivi)

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index 8b0e4defa3f1..36e368995bef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -339,10 +339,20 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 		ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config,
 						  conn_state, &limits,
 						  pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu, false);
-	}
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
 
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+		if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config)) {
+			int output_bpp = pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp;
+
+			if (output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock >=
+			    pipe_config->port_clock * 72) {
+				drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "UHBR check failed(required bw %d available %d)\n",
+					    output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, pipe_config->port_clock * 72);
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+		}
+	}
 
 	ret = intel_dp_mst_update_slots(encoder, pipe_config, conn_state);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.37.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
  2023-01-13 13:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check Stanislav Lisovskiy
@ 2023-01-13 14:35 ` Patchwork
  2023-01-13 14:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
  2023-01-13 22:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-01-13 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2897 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112806/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12582 -> Patchwork_112806v1
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/index.html

Participating hosts (44 -> 43)
------------------------------

  Missing    (1): fi-snb-2520m 

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_112806v1 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc:
    - fi-bsw-nick:        NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109271]) +1 similar issue
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/fi-bsw-nick/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
    - fi-bsw-nick:        [INCOMPLETE][2] -> [PASS][3]
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate:
    - {bat-adlp-6}:       [DMESG-FAIL][4] ([i915#7699]) -> [PASS][5]
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/bat-adlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate.html
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/bat-adlp-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@migrate.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [i915#4258]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4258
  [i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
  [i915#4983]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4983
  [i915#5354]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5354
  [i915#7359]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7359
  [i915#7625]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7625
  [i915#7699]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7699


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_12582 -> Patchwork_112806v1

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_12582: 312e96256f0520b8660750dd4fc937f63c2f359e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_7119: 1e6d24e6dfa42b22f950f7d5e436b8f9acf8747f @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_112806v1: 312e96256f0520b8660750dd4fc937f63c2f359e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


### Linux commits

4a2ff9e802c2 drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3159 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
  2023-01-13 13:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2023-01-13 14:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2023-01-13 14:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
  2023-01-16  7:51   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
  2023-01-13 22:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2023-01-13 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:06:28PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> According to spec, we should check if output_bpp * pixel_rate is less
> than DDI clock * 72, if UHBR is used.
> 
> HSDES: 1406899791
> BSPEC: 49259
> 
> v2: - Removed wrong comment(Rodrigo Vivi)
>     - Added HSDES to the commit msg(Rodrigo Vivi)
>     - Moved UHBR check to the MST specific code
> 
> v3: - Changed commit subject(Rodrigo Vivi)
>     - Fixed the error message if check fails(Rodrigo Vivi)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 8b0e4defa3f1..36e368995bef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -339,10 +339,20 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config,
>  						  conn_state, &limits,
>  						  pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu, false);
> -	}
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			return ret;
>  
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config)) {
> +			int output_bpp = pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp;
> +
> +			if (output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock >=
> +			    pipe_config->port_clock * 72) {
> +				drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "UHBR check failed(required bw %d available %d)\n",
> +					    output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, pipe_config->port_clock * 72);
> +				return -EINVAL;

Doesn't this just mean the user can never enable this particular
mode? Would seem more sensible to account for the extra
limitation when we determine port_clock and/or compressed_bpp.

> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	ret = intel_dp_mst_update_slots(encoder, pipe_config, conn_state);
>  	if (ret)
> -- 
> 2.37.3

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
  2023-01-13 13:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2023-01-13 14:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2023-01-13 14:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
@ 2023-01-13 22:43 ` Patchwork
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2023-01-13 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 19262 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112806/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12582_full -> Patchwork_112806v1_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/index.html

Participating hosts (12 -> 10)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): shard-rkl0 
  Missing    (3): pig-skl-6260u pig-kbl-iris pig-glk-j5005 

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_112806v1_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([i915#5566] / [i915#716])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-glk8/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-glk4/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-random-ccs-data-y_tiled_ccs:
    - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#109271]) +5 similar issues
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-glk8/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-random-ccs-data-y_tiled_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@bc-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#79]) +1 similar issue
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-glk6/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@bc-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2.html
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-glk7/igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@bc-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - shard-glk:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#4312])
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-glk4/igt@runner@aborted.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@fbdev@write:
    - {shard-dg1}:        [FAIL][7] ([i915#7863]) -> [PASS][8]
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-dg1-16/igt@fbdev@write.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-dg1-19/igt@fbdev@write.html

  * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][9] ([fdo#103375]) -> [PASS][10] +1 similar issue
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-4/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-suspend.html

  * igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-wc-noreloc:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][11] ([i915#3281]) -> [PASS][12] +5 similar issues
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-wc-noreloc.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-gtt-wc-noreloc.html

  * igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][13] -> [PASS][14]
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-glk1/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-glk8/igt@gem_ppgtt@flink-and-close-vma-leak.html

  * igt@gem_pread@display:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][15] ([i915#3282]) -> [PASS][16]
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-2/igt@gem_pread@display.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gem_pread@display.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@basic-rejected-ctx-param:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][17] ([i915#2527]) -> [PASS][18] +1 similar issue
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-4/igt@gen9_exec_parse@basic-rejected-ctx-param.html
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@gen9_exec_parse@basic-rejected-ctx-param.html

  * igt@i915_pipe_stress@stress-xrgb8888-ytiled:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][19] ([i915#4098]) -> [PASS][20]
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pipe_stress@stress-xrgb8888-ytiled.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pipe_stress@stress-xrgb8888-ytiled.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc9-dpms:
    - {shard-tglu}:       [SKIP][21] ([i915#4281]) -> [PASS][22]
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-tglu-1/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc9-dpms.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-tglu-2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc9-dpms.html

  * igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-hdmi-a:
    - {shard-dg1}:        [SKIP][23] ([i915#1937]) -> [PASS][24]
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-dg1-18/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-hdmi-a.html
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-dg1-14/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-hdmi-a.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle@rcs0:
    - {shard-dg1}:        [FAIL][25] ([i915#3591]) -> [PASS][26]
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-dg1-18/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle@rcs0.html
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-dg1-19/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle@rcs0.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-lpsp:
    - {shard-dg1}:        [SKIP][27] ([i915#1397]) -> [PASS][28] +1 similar issue
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-dg1-15/igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-lpsp.html
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-dg1-14/igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-lpsp.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@pm-tiling:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][29] ([fdo#109308]) -> [PASS][30]
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@pm-tiling.html
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-6/igt@i915_pm_rpm@pm-tiling.html

  * igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][31] ([i915#4387]) -> [PASS][32]
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-2/igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable.html
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@i915_pm_sseu@full-enable.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor@atomic-transitions-varying-size:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][33] ([i915#2346]) -> [PASS][34] +1 similar issue
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-glk2/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor@atomic-transitions-varying-size.html
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-glk5/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor@atomic-transitions-varying-size.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@a-hdmi-a1:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][35] ([i915#79]) -> [PASS][36]
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-glk1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@a-hdmi-a1.html
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-glk9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@a-hdmi-a1.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-render:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][37] ([i915#1849] / [i915#4098]) -> [PASS][38] +7 similar issues
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-render.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-shrfb-draw-render.html

  * igt@kms_hdmi_inject@inject-audio:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][39] ([i915#433]) -> [PASS][40]
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-3/igt@kms_hdmi_inject@inject-audio.html
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-1/igt@kms_hdmi_inject@inject-audio.html

  * igt@kms_psr@sprite_render:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][41] ([i915#1072]) -> [PASS][42]
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-5/igt@kms_psr@sprite_render.html
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_psr@sprite_render.html

  * igt@kms_universal_plane@disable-primary-vs-flip-pipe-b:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][43] ([i915#1845] / [i915#4098]) -> [PASS][44] +4 similar issues
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-5/igt@kms_universal_plane@disable-primary-vs-flip-pipe-b.html
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-6/igt@kms_universal_plane@disable-primary-vs-flip-pipe-b.html

  * igt@perf@gen8-unprivileged-single-ctx-counters:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [SKIP][45] ([i915#2436]) -> [PASS][46]
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-4/igt@perf@gen8-unprivileged-single-ctx-counters.html
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@perf@gen8-unprivileged-single-ctx-counters.html

  * igt@perf@polling-small-buf:
    - {shard-rkl}:        [FAIL][47] ([i915#1722]) -> [PASS][48]
   [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-rkl-4/igt@perf@polling-small-buf.html
   [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-rkl-5/igt@perf@polling-small-buf.html

  * igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@rcs0:
    - {shard-dg1}:        [FAIL][49] ([i915#1755]) -> [PASS][50] +1 similar issue
   [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12582/shard-dg1-12/igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@rcs0.html
   [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/shard-dg1-15/igt@sysfs_timeslice_duration@timeout@rcs0.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#103375]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103375
  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#109274]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
  [fdo#109279]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
  [fdo#109280]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109280
  [fdo#109283]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109283
  [fdo#109289]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109289
  [fdo#109295]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109295
  [fdo#109308]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109308
  [fdo#109315]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109315
  [fdo#109506]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109506
  [fdo#110189]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110189
  [fdo#110723]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110723
  [fdo#111068]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111068
  [fdo#111614]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111614
  [fdo#111615]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111615
  [fdo#111644]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111644
  [fdo#111656]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111656
  [fdo#111825]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111825
  [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827
  [fdo#112054]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112054
  [fdo#112283]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112283
  [i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
  [i915#132]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/132
  [i915#1397]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1397
  [i915#1722]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1722
  [i915#1755]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1755
  [i915#1769]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1769
  [i915#1825]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1825
  [i915#1839]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1839
  [i915#1845]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1845
  [i915#1849]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1849
  [i915#1937]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1937
  [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
  [i915#2346]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2346
  [i915#2436]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2436
  [i915#2437]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2437
  [i915#2527]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2527
  [i915#2575]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2575
  [i915#2582]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2582
  [i915#2587]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2587
  [i915#2672]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2672
  [i915#2681]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2681
  [i915#280]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/280
  [i915#2842]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2842
  [i915#2856]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2856
  [i915#2920]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2920
  [i915#2994]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2994
  [i915#3116]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3116
  [i915#315]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/315
  [i915#3281]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3281
  [i915#3282]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3282
  [i915#3291]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3291
  [i915#3297]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3297
  [i915#3299]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3299
  [i915#3359]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3359
  [i915#3528]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3528
  [i915#3546]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3546
  [i915#3555]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3555
  [i915#3591]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3591
  [i915#3637]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3637
  [i915#3638]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3638
  [i915#3689]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3689
  [i915#3708]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3708
  [i915#3734]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3734
  [i915#3742]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3742
  [i915#3826]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3826
  [i915#3886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3886
  [i915#3955]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3955
  [i915#404]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/404
  [i915#4070]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4070
  [i915#4078]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4078
  [i915#4098]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4098
  [i915#4103]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4103
  [i915#4270]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4270
  [i915#4281]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4281
  [i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
  [i915#433]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/433
  [i915#4349]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4349
  [i915#4387]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4387
  [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
  [i915#4767]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4767
  [i915#4877]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4877
  [i915#5176]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5176
  [i915#5235]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5235
  [i915#5286]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5286
  [i915#5288]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5288
  [i915#5289]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5289
  [i915#5325]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5325
  [i915#5327]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5327
  [i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533
  [i915#5461]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5461
  [i915#5566]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5566
  [i915#6095]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6095
  [i915#6117]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6117
  [i915#6227]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6227
  [i915#6245]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6245
  [i915#6247]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6247
  [i915#6248]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6248
  [i915#6334]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6334
  [i915#6344]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6344
  [i915#6355]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6355
  [i915#6433]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6433
  [i915#6497]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6497
  [i915#6524]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6524
  [i915#658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/658
  [i915#6768]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6768
  [i915#6944]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6944
  [i915#6946]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6946
  [i915#6953]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6953
  [i915#7037]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7037
  [i915#7116]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7116
  [i915#7118]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7118
  [i915#7128]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7128
  [i915#716]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/716
  [i915#7294]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7294
  [i915#7443]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7443
  [i915#7561]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7561
  [i915#7651]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7651
  [i915#7697]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7697
  [i915#7701]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7701
  [i915#7707]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7707
  [i915#7742]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7742
  [i915#7828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7828
  [i915#7863]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/7863
  [i915#79]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/79


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_12582 -> Patchwork_112806v1
  * Piglit: piglit_4509 -> None

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_12582: 312e96256f0520b8660750dd4fc937f63c2f359e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_7119: 1e6d24e6dfa42b22f950f7d5e436b8f9acf8747f @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_112806v1: 312e96256f0520b8660750dd4fc937f63c2f359e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_112806v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 13875 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
  2023-01-13 14:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
@ 2023-01-16  7:51   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav @ 2023-01-16  7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ville Syrjälä; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 04:43:54PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:06:28PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > According to spec, we should check if output_bpp * pixel_rate is less
> > than DDI clock * 72, if UHBR is used.
> > 
> > HSDES: 1406899791
> > BSPEC: 49259
> > 
> > v2: - Removed wrong comment(Rodrigo Vivi)
> >     - Added HSDES to the commit msg(Rodrigo Vivi)
> >     - Moved UHBR check to the MST specific code
> > 
> > v3: - Changed commit subject(Rodrigo Vivi)
> >     - Fixed the error message if check fails(Rodrigo Vivi)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > index 8b0e4defa3f1..36e368995bef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > @@ -339,10 +339,20 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  		ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config,
> >  						  conn_state, &limits,
> >  						  pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu, false);
> > -	}
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> > +			return ret;
> >  
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > +		if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(pipe_config)) {
> > +			int output_bpp = pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp;
> > +
> > +			if (output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock >=
> > +			    pipe_config->port_clock * 72) {
> > +				drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "UHBR check failed(required bw %d available %d)\n",
> > +					    output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, pipe_config->port_clock * 72);
> > +				return -EINVAL;
> 
> Doesn't this just mean the user can never enable this particular
> mode? Would seem more sensible to account for the extra
> limitation when we determine port_clock and/or compressed_bpp.

So do you mean I should add this as part of the constraints, that we check, where we optimize 
port_clock?  probably also then if we fail to find uncompressed more for that,
then we need to try with DSC, also gradually decreasing compressed_bpp.

Stan

> 
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	ret = intel_dp_mst_update_slots(encoder, pipe_config, conn_state);
> >  	if (ret)
> > -- 
> > 2.37.3
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
@ 2023-02-27 11:20 Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2023-03-09 12:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy @ 2023-02-27 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula

According to spec, we should check if output_bpp * pixel_rate is less
than DDI clock * 72, if UHBR is used.

v2: - s/pipe_config/crtc_state/ (Jani Nikula)
    - Merged previous patch into that one, to remove empty function(Jani Nikula)

HSDES: 1406899791
BSPEC: 49259

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index a860cbc5dbea..d0e2e37cd758 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -45,6 +45,26 @@
 #include "intel_hotplug.h"
 #include "skl_scaler.h"
 
+static int intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int bpp,
+					  const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode,
+					  struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state)) {
+		int output_bpp = bpp;
+		/* DisplayPort 2 128b/132b, bits per lane is always 32 */
+		int symbol_clock = crtc_state->port_clock / 32;
+
+		if (output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock >=
+		    symbol_clock * 72) {
+			drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "UHBR check failed(required bw %d available %d)\n",
+				    output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, symbol_clock * 72);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 						struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 						int max_bpp,
@@ -87,6 +107,10 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 
 		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Trying bpp %d\n", bpp);
 
+		ret = intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(i915, bpp, adjusted_mode, crtc_state);
+		if (ret)
+			continue;
+
 		slots = drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr,
 						      connector->port,
 						      crtc_state->pbn);
@@ -104,8 +128,8 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Despite slots are non-zero, we still failed the atomic check */
-	if (ret && slots >= 0)
+	/* We failed to find a proper bpp/timeslots, return error */
+	if (ret)
 		slots = ret;
 
 	if (slots < 0) {
-- 
2.37.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
  2023-02-27 11:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Stanislav Lisovskiy
@ 2023-03-09 12:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2023-03-09 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stanislav Lisovskiy; +Cc: jani.nikula, intel-gfx

On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 01:20:30PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> According to spec, we should check if output_bpp * pixel_rate is less
> than DDI clock * 72, if UHBR is used.
> 
> v2: - s/pipe_config/crtc_state/ (Jani Nikula)
>     - Merged previous patch into that one, to remove empty function(Jani Nikula)
> 
> HSDES: 1406899791
> BSPEC: 49259
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index a860cbc5dbea..d0e2e37cd758 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,26 @@
>  #include "intel_hotplug.h"
>  #include "skl_scaler.h"
>  
> +static int intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int bpp,
> +					  const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode,
> +					  struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state)) {
> +		int output_bpp = bpp;
> +		/* DisplayPort 2 128b/132b, bits per lane is always 32 */
> +		int symbol_clock = crtc_state->port_clock / 32;
> +
> +		if (output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock >=
> +		    symbol_clock * 72) {
> +			drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "UHBR check failed(required bw %d available %d)\n",
> +				    output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, symbol_clock * 72);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}

You're still doing this for non-DSC as well. Did we get any
clarification whether that is correct or not?

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  						struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  						int max_bpp,
> @@ -87,6 +107,10 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>  		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Trying bpp %d\n", bpp);
>  
> +		ret = intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(i915, bpp, adjusted_mode, crtc_state);
> +		if (ret)
> +			continue;
> +
>  		slots = drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr,
>  						      connector->port,
>  						      crtc_state->pbn);
> @@ -104,8 +128,8 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Despite slots are non-zero, we still failed the atomic check */
> -	if (ret && slots >= 0)
> +	/* We failed to find a proper bpp/timeslots, return error */
> +	if (ret)
>  		slots = ret;
>  
>  	if (slots < 0) {
> -- 
> 2.37.3

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
@ 2023-03-24 13:51 Stanislav Lisovskiy
  2023-04-04 10:56 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Lisovskiy @ 2023-03-24 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula

According to spec, we should check if output_bpp * pixel_rate is less
than DDI clock * 72, if UHBR is used.

v2: - s/pipe_config/crtc_state/ (Jani Nikula)
    - Merged previous patch into that one, to remove empty function(Jani Nikula)

v3: - Make that constraint check to be DSC-related only
    - Limit this to only DISPLAY_VER <= 13

HSDES: 1406899791
BSPEC: 49259

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index a860cbc5dbea..4c0edb760b8e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -45,6 +45,27 @@
 #include "intel_hotplug.h"
 #include "skl_scaler.h"
 
+static int intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int bpp,
+					  const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode,
+					  struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
+					  bool dsc)
+{
+	if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state) && DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= 13 && dsc) {
+		int output_bpp = bpp;
+		/* DisplayPort 2 128b/132b, bits per lane is always 32 */
+		int symbol_clock = crtc_state->port_clock / 32;
+
+		if (output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock >=
+		    symbol_clock * 72) {
+			drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "UHBR check failed(required bw %d available %d)\n",
+				    output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, symbol_clock * 72);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 						struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 						int max_bpp,
@@ -87,6 +108,10 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 
 		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Trying bpp %d\n", bpp);
 
+		ret = intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(i915, bpp, adjusted_mode, crtc_state, dsc);
+		if (ret)
+			continue;
+
 		slots = drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr,
 						      connector->port,
 						      crtc_state->pbn);
@@ -104,8 +129,8 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Despite slots are non-zero, we still failed the atomic check */
-	if (ret && slots >= 0)
+	/* We failed to find a proper bpp/timeslots, return error */
+	if (ret)
 		slots = ret;
 
 	if (slots < 0) {
-- 
2.37.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check
  2023-03-24 13:51 Stanislav Lisovskiy
@ 2023-04-04 10:56 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Govindapillai, Vinod @ 2023-04-04 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lisovskiy, Stanislav, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; +Cc: Nikula, Jani

Hi Stan,

On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 15:51 +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> According to spec, we should check if output_bpp * pixel_rate is less
> than DDI clock * 72, if UHBR is used.
> 
> v2: - s/pipe_config/crtc_state/ (Jani Nikula)
>     - Merged previous patch into that one, to remove empty function(Jani Nikula)
> 
> v3: - Make that constraint check to be DSC-related only
>     - Limit this to only DISPLAY_VER <= 13
> 
> HSDES: 1406899791
> BSPEC: 49259
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index a860cbc5dbea..4c0edb760b8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,27 @@
>  #include "intel_hotplug.h"
>  #include "skl_scaler.h"
>  
> +static int intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int bpp,
> +                                         const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode,
> +                                         struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> +                                         bool dsc)
> +{
> +       if (intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state) && DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= 13 && dsc) {
> +               int output_bpp = bpp;
> +               /* DisplayPort 2 128b/132b, bits per lane is always 32 */
> +               int symbol_clock = crtc_state->port_clock / 32;
> +
> +               if (output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock >=
> +                   symbol_clock * 72) {
> +                       drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "UHBR check failed(required bw %d available
> %d)\n",
> +                                   output_bpp * adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, symbol_clock * 72);
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>                                                 struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>                                                 int max_bpp,
> @@ -87,6 +108,10 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>                 drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Trying bpp %d\n", bpp);
>  
> +               ret = intel_dp_mst_check_constraints(i915, bpp, adjusted_mode, crtc_state, dsc);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       continue;
> +

One suggestion, if you move this constraints check to the top of the "for loop", you may be able to
save an unnecessary "drm_dp_calc_pbn_mode" call in case constraints doesn't match for a bpp.

Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>

>                 slots = drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr,
>                                                       connector->port,
>                                                       crtc_state->pbn);
> @@ -104,8 +129,8 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>                 }
>         }
>  
> -       /* Despite slots are non-zero, we still failed the atomic check */
> -       if (ret && slots >= 0)
> +       /* We failed to find a proper bpp/timeslots, return error */
> +       if (ret)
>                 slots = ret;
>  
>         if (slots < 0) {


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-04 10:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-13 13:06 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement UHBR bandwidth check Stanislav Lisovskiy
2023-01-13 14:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-01-13 14:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-01-16  7:51   ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2023-01-13 22:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-02-27 11:20 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Stanislav Lisovskiy
2023-03-09 12:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-24 13:51 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2023-04-04 10:56 ` Govindapillai, Vinod

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox