public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915/psr: Bring back HSW/BDW PSR AUX CH registers/setup
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:03:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEuoFFQ/dtyex2il@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c0609b8b655f939c55350b97bb4aa7fe5c9d7ec.camel@intel.com>

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 10:18:34AM +0000, Hogander, Jouni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Please check my inline comments below.
> 
> On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 15:02 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Reintroduce the special PSR AUX CH setup for hsw/bdw. Not all
> > of it was even removed (BDW AUX data registers were left behind).
> > Update the code to use REG_BIT() & co. while at it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c   |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.h   |  4 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      | 61
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h | 11 ++++
> >  4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> > index abf77ba76972..847fd6bfa7e4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> >  #include "intel_pps.h"
> >  #include "intel_tc.h"
> >  
> > -static u32 intel_dp_aux_pack(const u8 *src, int src_bytes)
> > +u32 intel_dp_aux_pack(const u8 *src, int src_bytes)
> >  {
> >         int i;
> >         u32 v = 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.h
> > index 138e340f94ee..3bc529a23dd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.h
> > @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
> >  #ifndef __INTEL_DP_AUX_H__
> >  #define __INTEL_DP_AUX_H__
> >  
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> >  enum aux_ch;
> >  struct intel_dp;
> >  struct intel_encoder;
> > @@ -15,4 +17,6 @@ void intel_dp_aux_init(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> >  
> >  enum aux_ch intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_encoder *encoder);
> >  
> > +u32 intel_dp_aux_pack(const u8 *src, int src_bytes);
> > +
> >  #endif /* __INTEL_DP_AUX_H__ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 7f748c7a71f3..2ff6f75c2bee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -288,6 +288,24 @@ static i915_reg_t psr_iir_reg(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >                 return EDP_PSR_IIR;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static i915_reg_t psr_aux_ctl_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +                                 enum transcoder cpu_transcoder)
> > +{
> > +       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
> > +               return EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL(cpu_transcoder);
> > +       else
> > +               return HSW_SRD_AUX_CTL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static i915_reg_t psr_aux_data_reg(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > +                                  enum transcoder cpu_transcoder,
> > int i)
> > +{
> > +       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 8)
> > +               return EDP_PSR_AUX_DATA(cpu_transcoder, i);
> > +       else
> > +               return HSW_SRD_AUX_DATA(i);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void psr_irq_control(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > @@ -512,6 +530,42 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >         }
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void hsw_psr_setup_aux(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > +{
> > +       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > +       enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> > +       u32 aux_clock_divider, aux_ctl;
> > +       static const u8 aux_msg[] = {
> > +               [0] = (DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE << 4) | ((DP_SET_POWER >>
> > 16) & 0xf),
> > +               [1] = (DP_SET_POWER >> 8) & 0xff,
> > +               [2] = DP_SET_POWER & 0xff,
> > +               [3] = 1 - 1,
> > +               [4] = DP_SET_POWER_D0,
> > +       };
> 
> Could you please add some description or provide some pointer which
> would help to parse what you are doing here?

It's just crafting a DP_SET_POWER=D0 DPCD write by hand.

I was thinking of refactoring the AUX msg packing code
to make thig something like
 struct drm_dp_aux_msg {
 	...
 };
 intel_dp_aux_pack_msg(msg)
but that would require some actual though so not something
I want to do in this patch. So for now I just restored
this to (more or less) what we had before.

> 
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(aux_msg) > 20);
> > +       for (i = 0; i < sizeof(aux_msg); i += 4)
> > +               intel_de_write(dev_priv,
> > +                              psr_aux_data_reg(dev_priv,
> > cpu_transcoder, i >> 2),
> > +                              intel_dp_aux_pack(&aux_msg[i],
> > sizeof(aux_msg) - i));
> > +
> > +       aux_clock_divider = intel_dp->get_aux_clock_divider(intel_dp,
> > 0);
> > +
> > +       /* Start with bits set for DDI_AUX_CTL register */
> > +       aux_ctl = intel_dp->get_aux_send_ctl(intel_dp,
> > sizeof(aux_msg),
> > +                                            aux_clock_divider);
> > +
> > +       /* Select only valid bits for SRD_AUX_CTL */
> > +       aux_ctl &= EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_TIME_OUT_MASK |
> > +               EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_MASK |
> > +               EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_PRECHARGE_2US_MASK |
> > +               EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_MASK;
> 
> How about using definitions from
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_regs.h?

I suppose we could define the bits as
 #define EPD_PSR_FOO DP_AUX_CH_CTL_FOO
instead of defining them with REG_BIT() & co. direclty,
to make it clear they are identical.

> Or just refer these
> being identical definitions to aux_send_ctl bits?
> 
> > +
> > +       intel_de_write(dev_priv, psr_aux_ctl_reg(dev_priv,
> > cpu_transcoder),
> > +                      aux_ctl);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void intel_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >  {
> >         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > @@ -1318,6 +1372,13 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >         enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> >         u32 mask;
> >  
> > +       /*
> > +        * Only HSW and BDW have PSR AUX registers that need to be
> > setup.
> > +        * SKL+ use hardcoded values PSR AUX transactions
> > +        */
> > +       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 9)
> > +               hsw_psr_setup_aux(intel_dp);
> > +
> >         /*
> >          * Per Spec: Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking MEMUP and
> > HPD also
> >          * mask LPSP to avoid dependency on other drivers that might
> > block
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > index 998f638ee182..5e54817b6a0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr_regs.h
> > @@ -80,6 +80,17 @@
> >  #define   EDP_PSR_PRE_ENTRY(trans)     (TGL_PSR_PRE_ENTRY
> > <<           \
> >                                          _EDP_PSR_TRANS_SHIFT(trans))
> >  
> > +#define
> > HSW_SRD_AUX_CTL                                _MMIO(0x64810)
> > +#define _SRD_AUX_CTL_A                         0x60810
> > +#define _SRD_AUX_CTL_EDP                       0x6f810
> > +#define EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL(tran)                  _MMIO_TRANS2(tran,
> > _SRD_AUX_CTL_A)
> > +#define  
> > EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_TIME_OUT_MASK                REG_GENMASK(27, 26)
> > +#define   EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_MESSAGE_SIZE_MASK    REG_GENMASK(24, 20)
> > +#define   EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_PRECHARGE_2US_MASK   REG_GENMASK(19, 16)
> > +#define   EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_ERROR_INTERRUPT      REG_BIT(11)
> > +#define   EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_MASK    REG_GENMASK(10, 0)
> > +
> > +#define HSW_SRD_AUX_DATA(i)                    _MMIO(0x64814 + (i) *
> > 4) /* 5 registers */
> >  #define _SRD_AUX_DATA_A                                0x60814
> >  #define _SRD_AUX_DATA_EDP                      0x6f814
> >  #define EDP_PSR_AUX_DATA(tran, i)              _MMIO_TRANS2(tran,
> > _SRD_AUX_DATA_A + (i) * 4) /* 5 registers */
> 
> BR,
> 
> Jouni Högander
> 

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-28 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-21 12:02 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915/psr: Restore HSW/BDW PSR1 Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Re-init clock gating on coming out of PC8+ Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915/psr: Fix BDW PSR AUX CH data register offsets Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915/psr: Wrap PSR1 register with functions Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/psr: Reintroduce HSW PSR1 registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915/psr: Bring back HSW/BDW PSR AUX CH registers/setup Ville Syrjala
2023-04-28 10:18   ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-04-28 11:03     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-04-28 11:31       ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-04-21 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/psr: HSW/BDW have no PSR2 Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/psr: Restore PSR interrupt handler for HSW Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/psr: Implement WaPsrDPAMaskVBlankInSRD:hsw Ville Syrjala
2023-04-28 10:36   ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-04-28 10:55     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-28 11:29       ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-04-21 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/psr: Implement WaPsrDPRSUnmaskVBlankInSRD:hsw Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/psr: Do no mask display register writes on hsw/bdw Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/psr: Don't skip both TP1 and TP2/3 " Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915/psr: Allow PSR with sprite enabled " Ville Syrjala
2023-04-21 12:03 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915/psr: Re-enable PSR1 on hdw/bdw Ville Syrjala
2023-04-28 11:19   ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-04-28 11:36     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-28 11:54       ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-04-21 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/psr: Restore HSW/BDW PSR1 Patchwork
2023-04-21 14:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-04-21 14:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-21 23:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZEuoFFQ/dtyex2il@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox