From: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
To: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Nemesa Garg" <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] drm/i915/casf: rename *_coeff*() into *_coef*()
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 23:49:35 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0953ba5-58f8-b852-b6e5-a80b4ce831ac@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260411174526.2850179-3-michal.grzelak@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2564 bytes --]
Title starts to make sense after swapping in it coeff <-> coef. Eh.
On Sat, 11 Apr 2026, Michał Grzelak wrote:
> Stick to the notion of already used *_coeff*() instead of *_coef*().
> Rename that way convert_sharpness_coef_binary() and
> intel_casf_scaler_compute_coef().
>
> v1->v2
> - rename intel_casf_scaler_compute_coef()
>
> Cc: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c
> index 9a306aee21994..c4fabffa369e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static void intel_casf_compute_win_size(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.win_size = SHARPNESS_FILTER_SIZE_7X7;
> }
>
> -static void intel_casf_scaler_compute_coef(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +static void intel_casf_scaler_compute_coeff(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
>
> int intel_casf_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ int intel_casf_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> intel_casf_compute_win_size(crtc_state);
>
> - intel_casf_scaler_compute_coef(crtc_state);
> + intel_casf_scaler_compute_coeff(crtc_state);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static void intel_casf_write_coeff(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> }
> }
>
> -static void convert_sharpness_coef_binary(struct scaler_filter_coeff *coeff,
> +static void convert_sharpness_coeff_binary(struct scaler_filter_coeff *coeff,
> u16 coefficient)
> {
> if (coefficient < 25) {
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void convert_sharpness_coef_binary(struct scaler_filter_coeff *coeff,
> }
> }
>
> -static void intel_casf_scaler_compute_coef(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +static void intel_casf_scaler_compute_coeff(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> const u16 *filtercoeff;
> u16 filter_coeff[SCALER_FILTER_NUM_TAPS];
> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void intel_casf_scaler_compute_coef(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>
> for (i = 0; i < SCALER_FILTER_NUM_TAPS; i++) {
> filter_coeff[i] = (*(filtercoeff + i) * 100 / sumcoeff);
> - convert_sharpness_coef_binary(&crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.coeff[i],
> + convert_sharpness_coeff_binary(&crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.coeff[i],
> filter_coeff[i]);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-12 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-11 17:45 [PATCH v2 00/10] drm/i915: casf & scaler refactoring Michał Grzelak
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/i915/casf: fix comment typos Michał Grzelak
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] drm/i915/casf: rename *_coeff*() into *_coef*() Michał Grzelak
2026-04-12 21:49 ` Michał Grzelak [this message]
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/i915: rename t into tap Michał Grzelak
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] drm/i915/casf: rename sumcoeff into sum_coeff Michał Grzelak
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/scaler: s/i/scaler_id where appropriate Michał Grzelak
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/scaler: remove id in favor of scaler_id Michał Grzelak
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915/scaler: unloop scaler readout that is run once Michał Grzelak
2026-04-14 8:01 ` Garg, Nemesa
2026-04-20 8:22 ` Grzelak, Michal
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] drm/i915/scaler: invert loop's breaking logic Michał Grzelak
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] drm/i915/scaler: abstract scaler searching loop Michał Grzelak
2026-04-13 12:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-20 8:19 ` Grzelak, Michal
2026-04-11 17:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] drm/i915/scaler: eliminate dead code Michał Grzelak
2026-04-11 18:41 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: casf & scaler refactoring (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-11 23:56 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0953ba5-58f8-b852-b6e5-a80b4ce831ac@intel.com \
--to=michal.grzelak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nemesa.garg@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox