From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/pmu: Export counters from all tiles
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 13:38:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1390c7d-5fc5-417c-93d0-77882d613414@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230506005816.1891043-7-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On 06/05/2023 01:58, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>
> Start exporting frequency and RC6 counters from all tiles.
>
> Existing counters keep their names and config values and new one use the
> namespace added in the previous patch, with the "-gtN" added to their
> names.
>
> Interrupts counter is an odd one off. Because it is the global device
> counters (not only GT) we choose not to add per tile versions for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> index 12b2f3169abf..284e5c5b97bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> @@ -546,8 +546,9 @@ config_status(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u64 config)
> struct intel_gt *gt = to_gt(i915);
>
> unsigned int gt_id = config_gt_id(config);
> + unsigned int max_gt_id = HAS_EXTRA_GT_LIST(i915) ? 1 : 0;
>
> - if (gt_id)
> + if (gt_id > max_gt_id)
Would this be clearer as:
unsigned in num_gts = 1 + (unsigned int)HAS_EXTRA_GT_LIST(i915);
if (gt_id >= num_gts)
?
Just thinking out loud, no real opinion either way.
> return -ENOENT;
>
> switch (config_counter(config)) {
> @@ -561,6 +562,8 @@ config_status(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u64 config)
> return -ENODEV;
> break;
> case I915_PMU_INTERRUPTS:
> + if (gt_id)
> + return -ENOENT;
> break;
> case I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY:
> if (!gt->rc6.supported)
> @@ -930,11 +933,20 @@ static const struct attribute_group i915_pmu_cpumask_attr_group = {
> .attrs = i915_cpumask_attrs,
> };
>
> -#define __event(__config, __name, __unit) \
> +#define __event(__counter, __name, __unit) \
> { \
> - .config = (__config), \
> + .counter = (__counter), \
> .name = (__name), \
> .unit = (__unit), \
> + .global = false, \
> +}
> +
> +#define __global_event(__counter, __name, __unit) \
> +{ \
> + .counter = (__counter), \
> + .name = (__name), \
> + .unit = (__unit), \
> + .global = true, \
> }
>
> #define __engine_event(__sample, __name) \
> @@ -973,15 +985,16 @@ create_event_attributes(struct i915_pmu *pmu)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = container_of(pmu, typeof(*i915), pmu);
> static const struct {
> - u64 config;
> + unsigned int counter;
> const char *name;
> const char *unit;
> + bool global;
> } events[] = {
> - __event(I915_PMU_ACTUAL_FREQUENCY, "actual-frequency", "M"),
> - __event(I915_PMU_REQUESTED_FREQUENCY, "requested-frequency", "M"),
> - __event(I915_PMU_INTERRUPTS, "interrupts", NULL),
> - __event(I915_PMU_RC6_RESIDENCY, "rc6-residency", "ns"),
> - __event(I915_PMU_SOFTWARE_GT_AWAKE_TIME, "software-gt-awake-time", "ns"),
> + __event(0, "actual-frequency", "M"),
> + __event(1, "requested-frequency", "M"),
> + __global_event(2, "interrupts", NULL),
> + __event(3, "rc6-residency", "ns"),
> + __event(4, "software-gt-awake-time", "ns"),
> };
> static const struct {
> enum drm_i915_pmu_engine_sample sample;
> @@ -996,12 +1009,17 @@ create_event_attributes(struct i915_pmu *pmu)
> struct i915_ext_attribute *i915_attr = NULL, *i915_iter;
> struct attribute **attr = NULL, **attr_iter;
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> - unsigned int i;
> + struct intel_gt *gt;
> + unsigned int i, j;
>
> /* Count how many counters we will be exposing. */
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(events); i++) {
> - if (!config_status(i915, events[i].config))
> - count++;
> + for_each_gt(gt, i915, j) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(events); i++) {
> + u64 config = ___I915_PMU_OTHER(j, events[i].counter);
> +
> + if (!config_status(i915, config))
> + count++;
> + }
> }
>
> for_each_uabi_engine(engine, i915) {
> @@ -1031,26 +1049,39 @@ create_event_attributes(struct i915_pmu *pmu)
> attr_iter = attr;
>
> /* Initialize supported non-engine counters. */
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(events); i++) {
> - char *str;
> -
> - if (config_status(i915, events[i].config))
> - continue;
> -
> - str = kstrdup(events[i].name, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!str)
> - goto err;
> + for_each_gt(gt, i915, j) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(events); i++) {
> + u64 config = ___I915_PMU_OTHER(j, events[i].counter);
> + char *str;
>
> - *attr_iter++ = &i915_iter->attr.attr;
> - i915_iter = add_i915_attr(i915_iter, str, events[i].config);
> + if (config_status(i915, config))
> + continue;
>
> - if (events[i].unit) {
> - str = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s.unit", events[i].name);
> + if (events[i].global || !HAS_EXTRA_GT_LIST(i915))
> + str = kstrdup(events[i].name, GFP_KERNEL);
> + else
> + str = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s-gt%u",
> + events[i].name, j);
> if (!str)
> goto err;
>
> - *attr_iter++ = &pmu_iter->attr.attr;
> - pmu_iter = add_pmu_attr(pmu_iter, str, events[i].unit);
> + *attr_iter++ = &i915_iter->attr.attr;
> + i915_iter = add_i915_attr(i915_iter, str, config);
> +
> + if (events[i].unit) {
> + if (events[i].global || !HAS_EXTRA_GT_LIST(i915))
Maybe worth moving the condition to for_each_gt?
bool use_gt_suffix = HAS_EXTRA_GT_LIST(i915) && !events[i].global;
Again, more questionable bike shedding.
Regards,
Tvrtko
> + str = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s.unit",
> + events[i].name);
> + else
> + str = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s-gt%u.unit",
> + events[i].name, j);
> + if (!str)
> + goto err;
> +
> + *attr_iter++ = &pmu_iter->attr.attr;
> + pmu_iter = add_pmu_attr(pmu_iter, str,
> + events[i].unit);
> + }
> }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-06 0:58 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Add MTL PMU support for multi-gt Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-06 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/pmu: Support PMU for all engines Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-08 17:52 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-09 12:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-06 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/pmu: Skip sampling engines with no enabled counters Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-08 17:53 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-06 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/pmu: Transform PMU parking code to be GT based Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-08 17:55 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-09 15:10 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-06 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/pmu: Add reference counting to the sampling timer Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-08 17:58 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-09 17:25 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-10 6:02 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-12 22:29 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-12 22:44 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-12 23:20 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-12 23:44 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-15 9:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-15 21:24 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-16 7:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-16 16:29 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-06 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/pmu: Prepare for multi-tile non-engine counters Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-08 18:07 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-12 1:08 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-12 10:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-12 20:57 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-12 22:37 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-13 1:09 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-15 10:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-15 22:07 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-16 8:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-06 0:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/pmu: Export counters from all tiles Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-08 18:08 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-09 12:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2023-05-11 18:57 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-12 10:57 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2023-05-12 17:08 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-12 18:53 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-12 20:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-05-06 2:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add MTL PMU support for multi-gt (rev2) Patchwork
2023-05-06 2:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-05-06 2:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-13 1:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Add MTL PMU support for multi-gt Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-13 1:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/pmu: Export counters from all tiles Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-15 6:44 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/6] Add MTL PMU support for multi-gt Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-05-15 6:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/pmu: Export counters from all tiles Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1390c7d-5fc5-417c-93d0-77882d613414@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox