public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] iommu/vt-d: Disable superpage for Geminilake igfx
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:34:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dcc41a8e-8076-5798-75da-1c356756d9b0@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOxkBeICOosZcVEY@intel.com>

On 7/12/21 11:47 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 07:23:07AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> On 7/10/21 12:47 AM, Ville Syrjala wrote:
>>> From: Ville Syrjälä<ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> While running "gem_exec_big --r single" from igt-gpu-tools on
>>> Geminilake as soon as a 2M mapping is made I tend to get a DMAR
>>> write fault. Strangely the faulting address is always a 4K page
>>> and usually very far away from the 2M page that got mapped.
>>> But if no 2M mappings get used I can't reproduce the fault.
>>>
>>> I also tried to dump the PTE for the faulting address but it actually
>>> looks correct to me (ie. definitely seems to have the write bit set):
>>>    DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
>>>    DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [00:02.0] PASID ffffffff fault addr 7fa8a78000 [fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set
>>>    DMAR: fault 7fa8a78000 (level=1) PTE = 149efc003
>>>
>>> So not really sure what's going on and this might just be full on duct
>>> tape, but it seems to work here. The machine has now survived a whole day
>>> running that test whereas with superpage enabled it fails in less than
>>> a minute usually.
>>>
>>> TODO: might be nice to disable superpage only for the igfx iommu
>>>         instead of both iommus
>> If all these quirks are about igfx dedicated iommu's, I would suggest to
>> disable superpage only for the igfx ones.
> Sure. Unfortunately there's no convenient mechanism to do that in
> the iommu driver that I can immediately see. So not something I
> can just whip up easily. Since you're actually familiar with the
> driver maybe you can come up with a decent solution for that?
> 

How about something like below? [no compile, no test...]

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 1131b8efb050..2d51ef288a9e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_strict;
  static int intel_iommu_superpage = 1;
  static int iommu_identity_mapping;
  static int iommu_skip_te_disable;
+static int iommu_skip_igfx_superpage;

  #define IDENTMAP_GFX		2
  #define IDENTMAP_AZALIA		4
@@ -652,6 +653,27 @@ static bool domain_update_iommu_snooping(struct 
intel_iommu *skip)
  	return ret;
  }

+static bool domain_use_super_page(struct dmar_domain *domain)
+{
+	struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
+	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
+	bool ret = true;
+
+	if (!intel_iommu_superpage)
+		return false;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
+		if (drhd->gfx_dedicated && iommu_skip_igfx_superpage) {
+			ret = false;
+			break
+		}
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
  static int domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct dmar_domain *domain,
  					 struct intel_iommu *skip)
  {
@@ -659,7 +681,7 @@ static int domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct 
dmar_domain *domain,
  	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
  	int mask = 0x3;

-	if (!intel_iommu_superpage)
+	if (!domain_use_super_page(domain))
  		return 0;

  	/* set iommu_superpage to the smallest common denominator */
@@ -5656,6 +5678,14 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 
0x1632, quirk_iommu_igfx);
  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x163A, quirk_iommu_igfx);
  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x163D, quirk_iommu_igfx);

+static void quirk_skip_igfx_superpage(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	pci_info(dev, "Disabling IOMMU superpage for graphics on this chipset\n");
+	iommu_skip_igfx_superpage = 1;
+}
+
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3184, 
quirk_skip_igfx_superpage);
+
  static void quirk_iommu_rwbf(struct pci_dev *dev)
  {
  	if (risky_device(dev))

Best regards,
baolu
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-13  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-09 16:47 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vt-d: Disable igfx iommu superpage on bxt/skl/glk Ville Syrjala
2021-07-09 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] iommu/vt-d: Disable superpage for Geminilake igfx Ville Syrjala
2021-07-11 23:23   ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-12 15:47     ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-07-13  1:34       ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2021-07-13 20:30         ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-07-14  1:31           ` Lu Baolu
2021-07-09 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Disable superpage for Broxton igfx Ville Syrjala
2021-07-09 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] iommu/vt-d: Disable superpage for Skylake igfx Ville Syrjala
2021-07-09 16:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/fbc: Allow FBC + VT-d on SKL/BXT Ville Syrjala
2021-07-09 18:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for iommu/vt-d: Disable igfx iommu superpage on bxt/skl/glk Patchwork
2021-07-09 18:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-10 12:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-13  1:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for iommu/vt-d: Disable igfx iommu superpage on bxt/skl/glk (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dcc41a8e-8076-5798-75da-1c356756d9b0@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox