From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
<joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/wa: Introduce intel_wa_cpu.c for CPU specific workarounds
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:56:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5b7b830-2c7b-4e64-bf5f-9fa06a61a78b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241011103250.1035316-4-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Hi Raag
On 10/11/2024 4:02 PM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> Having similar naming convention in intel-family.h and intel_device_info.h
> results in redefinition of a few platforms. Define CPU IDs in its own file
> to avoid this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_wa_cpu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_wa_cpu.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> index c63fa2133ccb..1f9b503ab976 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ gt-y += \
> gt/intel_timeline.o \
> gt/intel_tlb.o \
> gt/intel_wopcm.o \
> + gt/intel_wa_cpu.o \
Why is this file under gt/ ? Doesn't seem to be gt specific
> gt/intel_workarounds.o \
> gt/shmem_utils.o \
> gt/sysfs_engines.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_wa_cpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_wa_cpu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cbdab13e9db6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_wa_cpu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2024 Intel Corporation
> + *
> + * This file is introduced to avoid platform redefinition from
> + * intel_device_info.h :(
> + */
> +
> +#include "intel_workarounds.h"
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> +#include <asm/intel-family.h>
> +
> +static const struct x86_cpu_id wa_cpu_ids[] = {
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ALDERLAKE, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ALDERLAKE_L, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_COMETLAKE, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_KABYLAKE, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_KABYLAKE_L, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_P, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_S, NULL),
> + X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ROCKETLAKE, NULL),
> + {}
> +};
> +
Add a doc
Thanks,
Riana
> +bool intel_match_wa_cpu(void)
> +{
> + return x86_match_cpu(wa_cpu_ids);
> +}
> +#else
> +bool intel_match_wa_cpu(void) { return false; }
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.h
> index 9beaab77c7f0..12f24fb31363 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ static inline void intel_wa_list_free(struct i915_wa_list *wal)
> memset(wal, 0, sizeof(*wal));
> }
>
> +bool intel_match_wa_cpu(void);
> +
> void intel_engine_init_ctx_wa(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
> int intel_engine_emit_ctx_wa(struct i915_request *rq);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 10:32 [PATCH v2 0/4] Implement Wa_14022698537 Raag Jadav
2024-10-11 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/pciids: Refactor DG2 PCI IDs into workaround ranges Raag Jadav
2024-10-11 10:40 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-11 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/dg2: Introduce DG2_WA subplatform Raag Jadav
2024-10-11 10:44 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-15 9:54 ` Raag Jadav
2024-10-11 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/wa: Introduce intel_wa_cpu.c for CPU specific workarounds Raag Jadav
2024-10-11 10:52 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-15 10:26 ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2024-10-16 9:01 ` Raag Jadav
2024-10-22 9:53 ` Riana Tauro
2024-10-11 10:32 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/dg2: Implement Wa_14022698537 Raag Jadav
2024-10-15 10:02 ` Riana Tauro
2024-10-22 13:11 ` Nilawar, Badal
2024-10-23 7:09 ` Raag Jadav
2024-10-23 8:25 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2024-10-11 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Jani Nikula
2024-10-11 11:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2024-10-11 11:35 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-10-11 11:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5b7b830-2c7b-4e64-bf5f-9fa06a61a78b@intel.com \
--to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox