From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@Intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/xe/pat: Return error from xe_pat_init_early() on unknown platform
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:40:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0300c6bf-3f12-4944-a8fd-370ce07fd9d3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4fe2692-700d-4a88-ba1d-6806e6ea4b12@Intel.com>
On 9/18/2026 6:31 AM, Dnyaneshwar Bhadane wrote:
>
>
> On 09-Sep-26 12:07 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/8/2026 12:45 PM, Dnyaneshwar Bhadane wrote:
>>> xe_pat_init_early() currently only logs an error when the platform's
>>> graphics version doesn't match any known PAT table, but continues
>>> probing with an uninitialized pat.ops. This can lead to a NULL
>>> pointer dereference later when pat.ops is used.
>>>
>>> Change xe_pat_init_early() to return an int and propagate -ENODATA
>>> to xe_device_probe() so the driver fails to load cleanly instead of
>>> continuing in a broken state.
>>>
>>
>> Fixes: ??
> Hi, For the missing pat we should not process the further as we need proper IP specific xe->pat.ops assigned before moving from this function. so early exit from the driver probe would limit the pat->ops null pointer in xe_pat_init access.?
I know what's broken, as I pointed that out in [1]
what I meant here, that maybe we need to add the proper "Fixes:" tag with the commit that introduced that possible NPD
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/744652/?series=171725&rev=1#comment_1371831
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 4 +++-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c | 14 +++++---------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> index 8583b2e9ecf4..b7f78d45dee1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>> @@ -960,7 +960,9 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> int err;
>>> u8 id;
>>> - xe_pat_init_early(xe);
>>> + err = xe_pat_init_early(xe);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> err = xe_sriov_init(xe);
>>> if (err)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>> index a5fe1beec652..8af92e3c4c17 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static const struct xe_pat_ops xe3p_xpc_pat_ops = {
>>> .entry_dump = xe3p_xpc_pat_entry_dump,
>>> };
>>>
>>
>> now it's time to add kernel-doc
> Yes, I will add this in document.>> -void xe_pat_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> +int xe_pat_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> {
>>> xe->pat.idx[XE_CACHE_WB_COMPRESSION] = XE_PAT_INVALID_IDX;
>>> xe->pat.idx[XE_CACHE_NONE_COMPRESSION] = XE_PAT_INVALID_IDX;
>>> @@ -678,22 +678,18 @@ void xe_pat_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>>> xe->pat.idx[XE_CACHE_WT] = 2;
>>> xe->pat.idx[XE_CACHE_WB] = 0;
>>> } else {
>>> - /*
>>> - * Going forward we expect to need new PAT settings for most
>>> - * new platforms; failure to provide a new table can easily
>>> - * lead to subtle, hard-to-debug problems. If none of the
>>> - * conditions above match the platform we're running on we'll
>>> - * raise an error rather than trying to silently inherit the
>>> - * most recent platform's behavior.
>>> - */
>>
>> can't we leave this comment as-is?
> Noted. Thank you Michal
>
> Dnyaneshwar, >
>>> drm_err(&xe->drm, "Missing PAT table for platform with graphics version %d.%02d!\n",
>>> GRAPHICS_VER(xe), GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) % 100);
>>> + return -ENODATA;
>>> +
>>> }
>>> + xe_assert(xe, xe->pat.ops);
>>> xe_assert(xe, xe->pat.ops->dump);
>>> xe_assert(xe, xe->pat.ops->program_graphics);
>>> xe_assert(xe, MEDIA_VER(xe) < 13 || xe->pat.ops->program_media);
>>> xe_assert(xe, GRAPHICS_VER(xe) < 20 || xe->pat.ops->entry_dump);
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>> void xe_pat_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
>>> index 7060f66e1d63..66e335fb3b0c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.h
>>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct xe_pat_table_entry {
>>> * xe_pat_init_early - SW initialization, setting up data based on device
>>> * @xe: xe device
>>> */
>>> -void xe_pat_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>>> +int xe_pat_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>>> /**
>>> * xe_pat_init - Program HW PAT table
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 10:45 [PATCH v3 00/13] drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] drm/xe/log: Add VRAM, PAT, and HWMON DRIVER_HARDWARE components Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-23 4:42 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] drm/xe/ggtt: Report GGTT errors using structured logging Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 4:43 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] drm/xe/hwmon: Report errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] drm/xe/mmio: Report BAR mapping " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] drm/xe/memirq: Report " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 10:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] drm/xe/reg_whitelist: Report whitelist overflow " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 18:12 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-22 10:16 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] drm/xe/reg_sr: Report save-restore errors " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 18:33 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-23 5:49 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] drm/xe/pat: Return error from xe_pat_init_early() on unknown platform Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 18:37 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-18 4:31 ` Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-18 7:40 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] drm/xe/pat: Report missing PAT table using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-23 4:54 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] drm/xe/pci: Report unknown GMDID versions " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] drm/xe/lmtt: Report invalidation errors " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] drm/xe/vram: Report tile vs device VRAM visibility errors Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-08 13:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API (rev3) Patchwork
2026-09-08 14:21 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-08 18:11 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0300c6bf-3f12-4944-a8fd-370ce07fd9d3@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@Intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox