From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: "Anoop, Vijay" <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
<paul.e.luse@intel.com>, <mohamed.mansoor.v@intel.com>,
<kam.nasim@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/6] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add mailbox communication implementation
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:43:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fb27f15-0cdc-4157-99fa-a0ed88a30f17@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260310182336.611041-13-anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
Hi Anoop
On 3/10/2026 11:53 PM, Anoop, Vijay wrote:
> From: Anoop Vijay <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
>
> Adding mailbox communication layer for System Controller
> interaction. The mailbox interface enables sending commands and
> receiving responses from embedded System Controller.
>
> Key features:
> - Command/response protocol handling
> - Timeout and error management
> - Uses protocol headers defined in ABI
>
> Signed-off-by: Anoop Vijay <anoop.c.vijay@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> ---
> v4: (Matt, Mike)
> - Refactor MMIO access to use domain-specific accessor
> - Add input validation and buffer overflow protection
> - Add bounds checking for multi-frame operations
> - Fix potential NULL pointer dereference
>
> v5: (Umesh, Riana)
> - Reset phase bit to 0 on error conditions
> - Refactor mailbox receive path
> - Updated xe_err messages for consistency
>
> v6: (Matt)
> - Use SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_MKHI_CMD macro instead of FIELD_PREP
>
> v8: (Matt, Michal)
> - Reordered patches for logical flow
> - Static functions renamed with short prefix
> - Changed xe_sysctrl_send_command() function parameter from 'xe' to 'sc'
> - Added frame length validation and command overflow protection
> - Use REG_FIELD_PREP for hardware registers
> - Changed error format to %pe
> - Removed unnecessary NULL checks and explicit zeros
> - Fixed kernel-doc syntax
>
> v9: (Umesh, Badal)
> - Renamed MKHI to SCHI (System Controller Host Interface)
> - Fixed kernel-doc syntax
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c | 364 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 367 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index 76a86818986a..7d13a3e43c9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ xe-y += xe_bb.o \
> xe_survivability_mode.o \
> xe_sync.o \
> xe_sysctrl.o \
> + xe_sysctrl_mailbox.o \
> xe_tile.o \
> xe_tile_sysfs.o \
> xe_tlb_inval.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c
> index 2751fe25a6ff..365f73ef680d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl.c
> @@ -78,5 +78,7 @@ int xe_sysctrl_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + xe_sysctrl_mailbox_init(sc);
> +
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b08885cf8dd5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sysctrl_mailbox.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +#include <linux/container_of.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
These are redundant includes that are already
included by below files.
I don't see an issue removing these
> +
> +#include "regs/xe_sysctrl_regs.h"
> +#include "xe_device.h"
> +#include "xe_device_types.h"
> +#include "xe_mmio.h"
> +#include "xe_pm.h"
> +#include "xe_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_sysctrl.h"
> +#include "xe_sysctrl_mailbox.h"
> +#include "xe_sysctrl_mailbox_types.h"
> +#include "xe_sysctrl_types.h"
> +
> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_GROUP_ID(hdr) \
> + FIELD_GET(SCHI_HDR_GROUP_ID_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
> +
> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_COMMAND(hdr) \
> + FIELD_GET(SCHI_HDR_COMMAND_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
> +
> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE(hdr) \
> + FIELD_GET(SCHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
> +
> +#define XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_RESULT(hdr) \
> + FIELD_GET(SCHI_HDR_RESULT_MASK, le32_to_cpu((hdr)->data))
> +
> +static bool sysctrl_wait_bit_clear(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, u32 bit_mask,
> + unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32_not(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL, bit_mask, bit_mask,
> + timeout_ms * 1000, NULL, false);
> +
> + return ret == 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool sysctrl_wait_bit_set(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, u32 bit_mask,
> + unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = xe_mmio_wait32(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL, bit_mask, bit_mask,
> + timeout_ms * 1000, NULL, false);
> +
> + return ret == 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sysctrl_write_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, const void *frame,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + static const struct xe_reg regs[] = {
> + SYSCTRL_MB_DATA0, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA1, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA2, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA3
> + };
> + struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
> + u32 val[XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE / sizeof(u32)] = {0};
> + u32 dw = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, sizeof(u32));
> + u32 i;
> +
> + xe_assert(xe, len > 0 && len <= XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
> +
> + memcpy(val, frame, len);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < dw; i++)
> + xe_mmio_write32(sc->mmio, regs[i], val[i]);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sysctrl_read_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, void *frame,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + static const struct xe_reg regs[] = {
> + SYSCTRL_MB_DATA0, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA1, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA2, SYSCTRL_MB_DATA3
> + };
> + struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
> + u32 val[XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE / sizeof(u32)] = {0};
> + u32 dw = DIV_ROUND_UP(len, sizeof(u32));
> + u32 i;
> +
> + xe_assert(xe, len > 0 && len <= XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < dw; i++)
> + val[i] = xe_mmio_read32(sc->mmio, regs[i]);
> +
> + memcpy(frame, val, len);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void sysctrl_clear_response(struct xe_sysctrl *sc)
> +{
> + xe_mmio_rmw32(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int sysctrl_prepare_command(struct xe_device *xe,
> + u8 group_id, u8 command,
> + const void *data_in, size_t data_in_len,
> + u8 **mbox_cmd, size_t *cmd_size)
> +{
> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_schi_msg_hdr *schi_hdr;
> + size_t size;
> + u8 *buffer;
> +
> + xe_assert(xe, command <= SCHI_HDR_COMMAND_MAX);
> +
> + if (data_in_len > XE_SYSCTRL_MB_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*schi_hdr)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Input data too large: %zu bytes\n", data_in_len);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + size = sizeof(*schi_hdr) + data_in_len;
> +
> + buffer = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buffer)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + schi_hdr = (struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_schi_msg_hdr *)buffer;
> + schi_hdr->data = cpu_to_le32(FIELD_PREP(SCHI_HDR_GROUP_ID_MASK, group_id) |
> + FIELD_PREP(SCHI_HDR_COMMAND_MASK, command));
> +
> + if (data_in && data_in_len)
> + memcpy(buffer + sizeof(*schi_hdr), data_in, data_in_len);
> +
> + *mbox_cmd = buffer;
> + *cmd_size = size;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sysctrl_send_frames(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
> + const u8 *mbox_cmd,
> + size_t cmd_size, unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
> + u32 ctrl_reg, total_frames, frame;
> + size_t bytes_sent, frame_size;
> +
> + total_frames = DIV_ROUND_UP(cmd_size, XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
> +
> + if (!sysctrl_wait_bit_clear(sc, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY, timeout_ms)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Mailbox busy\n");
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + sc->phase_bit ^= 1;
> + bytes_sent = 0;
> +
> + for (frame = 0; frame < total_frames; frame++) {
> + frame_size = min_t(size_t, cmd_size - bytes_sent, XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
> +
> + if (sysctrl_write_frame(sc, mbox_cmd + bytes_sent, frame_size)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Failed to write frame %u\n", frame);
> + sc->phase_bit = 0;
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + ctrl_reg = SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY |
> + REG_FIELD_PREP(SCHI_FRAME_CURRENT_MASK, frame) |
> + REG_FIELD_PREP(SCHI_FRAME_TOTAL_MASK, total_frames - 1) |
> + SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_SCHI_CMD |
> + (sc->phase_bit ? SCHI_FRAME_PHASE : 0);
> +
> + xe_mmio_write32(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL, ctrl_reg);
> +
> + if (!sysctrl_wait_bit_clear(sc, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY, timeout_ms)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Frame %u acknowledgment timeout\n", frame);
> + sc->phase_bit = 0;
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + bytes_sent += frame_size;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sysctrl_process_frame(struct xe_sysctrl *sc, void *out,
> + size_t frame_size, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> + bool *done)
> +{
> + u32 curr_frame, total_frames, ctrl_reg;
> + struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!sysctrl_wait_bit_set(sc, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL_RUN_BUSY_OUT, timeout_ms)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Response frame timeout\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
> +
> + ctrl_reg = xe_mmio_read32(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL);
> + total_frames = FIELD_GET(SCHI_FRAME_TOTAL_MASK, ctrl_reg);
> + curr_frame = FIELD_GET(SCHI_FRAME_CURRENT_MASK, ctrl_reg);
> +
> + ret = sysctrl_read_frame(sc, out, frame_size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + sysctrl_clear_response(sc);
> +
> + if (curr_frame == total_frames)
> + *done = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sysctrl_receive_frames(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
> + const struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_schi_msg_hdr *req,
> + void *data_out, size_t data_out_len,
> + size_t *rdata_len, unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_schi_msg_hdr *schi_hdr;
> + struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
> + size_t remain = sizeof(*schi_hdr) + data_out_len;
> + u8 *buffer __free(kfree) = kzalloc(remain, GFP_KERNEL);
> + size_t frame_size;
> + bool done = false;
> + int ret = 0;
> + u8 *out;
> +
> + if (!buffer)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + out = buffer;
> + while (!done && remain) {
> + frame_size = min_t(size_t, remain, XE_SYSCTRL_MB_FRAME_SIZE);
> +
> + ret = sysctrl_process_frame(sc, out, frame_size, timeout_ms,
> + &done);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + remain -= frame_size;
> + out += frame_size;
> + }
> +
> + schi_hdr = (struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_schi_msg_hdr *)buffer;
> +
> + if (!XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_IS_RESPONSE(schi_hdr) ||
> + XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_GROUP_ID(schi_hdr) != XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_GROUP_ID(req) ||
> + XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_COMMAND(schi_hdr) != XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_COMMAND(req)) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Response header mismatch\n");
> + return -EPROTO;
> + }
> +
> + if (XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_RESULT(schi_hdr) != 0) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Firmware error: 0x%02lx\n",
> + XE_SYSCTRL_SCHI_HDR_RESULT(schi_hdr));
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(data_out, schi_hdr + 1, data_out_len);
> + *rdata_len = out - buffer - sizeof(*schi_hdr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sysctrl_send_command(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
> + const u8 *mbox_cmd, size_t cmd_size,
> + void *data_out, size_t data_out_len,
> + size_t *rdata_len, unsigned int timeout_ms)
> +{
> + const struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_schi_msg_hdr *schi_hdr;
> + size_t received;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = sysctrl_send_frames(sc, mbox_cmd, cmd_size, timeout_ms);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!data_out || !rdata_len)
> + return 0;
> +
> + schi_hdr = (const struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_schi_msg_hdr *)mbox_cmd;
> +
> + ret = sysctrl_receive_frames(sc, schi_hdr, data_out, data_out_len,
> + &received, timeout_ms);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *rdata_len = received;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_sysctrl_mailbox_init - Initialize System Controller mailbox interface
> + * @sc: System controller structure
> + *
> + * Initialize system controller mailbox interface for communication.
> + */
> +void xe_sysctrl_mailbox_init(struct xe_sysctrl *sc)
> +{
> + u32 ctrl_reg;
> +
> + ctrl_reg = xe_mmio_read32(sc->mmio, SYSCTRL_MB_CTRL);
> + sc->phase_bit = (ctrl_reg & SCHI_FRAME_PHASE) ? 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * xe_sysctrl_send_command() - Send command to System Controller via mailbox
> + * @sc: System Controller instance
> + * @cmd: Pointer to xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command structure
> + * @rdata_len: Pointer to store actual response data size (can be NULL)
> + *
> + * Send a command to the System Controller using SCHI protocol. Handles
Same as other patches. SCHI protocol is undefined.
> + * command preparation, fragmentation, transmission, and response reception.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative error code on failure
> + */
> +int xe_sysctrl_send_command(struct xe_sysctrl *sc,
> + struct xe_sysctrl_mailbox_command *cmd,
> + size_t *rdata_len)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = sc_to_xe(sc);
> + u8 group_id, command_code;
> + u8 *mbox_cmd = NULL;
> + size_t cmd_size = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
Initialization is unnecessary
> +
> + xe_assert(xe, xe->info.has_sysctrl);
> + xe_assert(xe, cmd->data_in || cmd->data_out);
> + xe_assert(xe, !cmd->data_in || cmd->data_in_len);
> + xe_assert(xe, !cmd->data_out || cmd->data_out_len);
> +
> + group_id = XE_SYSCTRL_APP_HDR_GROUP_ID(&cmd->header);
> + command_code = XE_SYSCTRL_APP_HDR_COMMAND(&cmd->header);
> +
> + might_sleep();
> +
> + ret = sysctrl_prepare_command(xe, group_id, command_code,
> + cmd->data_in, cmd->data_in_len,
> + &mbox_cmd, &cmd_size);
> + if (ret) {
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Failed to prepare command: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
Runtime pm should be in the outermost layer.
Should this be here or the upper layers?
++ @Rodrigo thoughts?
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&sc->cmd_lock);
> +
> + ret = sysctrl_send_command(sc, mbox_cmd, cmd_size,
> + cmd->data_out, cmd->data_out_len, rdata_len,
> + XE_SYSCTRL_MB_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS);
Why not use the macro directly instead of sending it as a parameter?
Thanks
Riana
> + if (ret)
> + xe_err(xe, "sysctrl: Mailbox command failed: %pe\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
> +
> + kfree(mbox_cmd);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 18:23 [PATCH v9 0/6] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add system controller component for Xe3p dGPU platforms Anoop, Vijay
2026-03-10 18:23 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add System Controller types and device integration Anoop, Vijay
2026-03-18 16:07 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-03-10 18:23 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add System Controller register definitions Anoop, Vijay
2026-03-10 18:23 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add mailbox communication headers Anoop, Vijay
2026-03-11 7:29 ` Riana Tauro
2026-03-13 4:47 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-03-10 18:23 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add System Controller initialization Anoop, Vijay
2026-03-11 10:16 ` Gupta, Anshuman
2026-03-11 10:59 ` Riana Tauro
2026-03-12 4:32 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-03-10 18:23 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add mailbox communication implementation Anoop, Vijay
2026-03-12 5:13 ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2026-03-10 18:23 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] drm/xe/pci: Enable System Controller for CRI platform Anoop, Vijay
2026-03-11 11:31 ` Riana Tauro
2026-03-12 5:54 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-03-10 18:30 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/sysctrl: Add system controller component for Xe3p dGPU platforms (rev10) Patchwork
2026-03-10 18:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-10 19:08 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-11 12:30 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-12 5:18 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] drm/xe/sysctrl: Add system controller component for Xe3p dGPU platforms Riana Tauro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1fb27f15-0cdc-4157-99fa-a0ed88a30f17@intel.com \
--to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=anoop.c.vijay@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kam.nasim@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=mohamed.mansoor.v@intel.com \
--cc=paul.e.luse@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox