Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Suraj Kandpal" <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/i915/dp: Add M/N ratio check with warning for DP link config
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 09:23:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916092330.2A0891F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916090946.677564-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] drm: log spam and DoS vector due to invariant drm_WARN inside bpp_x16 loop
--

commit cb9847e0babf613d9ed13f234a331025ee93ec9c
Author: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

drm/i915/dp: Add M/N ratio check with warning for DP link config

This commit introduces intel_dp_check_m_n_ratio() to validate the computed
link M/N ratio against the maximum allowed value. It issues a warning via
drm_WARN() if the limit is exceeded.

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 430ba1230c5ae..364f62563f904 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,8 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  					 link_bpp_x16,
>  					 &crtc_state->dp_m_n);
>  
> +		intel_dp_check_m_n_ratio(crtc_state, &crtc_state->dp_m_n);
		^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[Severity: Medium]
Will this evaluate a loop-invariant condition on every iteration of the
bpp_x16 loop in intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config() in intel_dp_mst.c?

Because intel_dp_check_m_n_ratio() uses drm_WARN() and is called inside this
loop, a KMS client requesting an MST mode where the link_m / link_n ratio
exceeds max_m_n_ratio could trigger a full kernel stack trace for every failed
loop iteration.

When DSC is used, bpp_step_x16 can be as small as 1/16 bpp. Could this cause
the loop to run potentially hundreds of times for an un-fittable mode, flooding
the kernel log and leading to dmesg rollover or console lockups?

> +
>  		if (is_mst) {
>  			int remote_bw_overhead;
>  			int remote_tu;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916090946.677564-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16  9:09 [PATCH v3 00/10] Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] drm/i915/display: Add helper to compute link M/N ratio for reuse Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/i915/dp: Limit M/N ratio for DP SST Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16  9:33     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/i915/dp_mst: Limit M/N ratio for MST Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/i915/dp: Add M/N ratio check with warning for DP link config Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:23   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/i915/display: Add bits for link_n_extended for DISPLAY >= 14 Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/i915/display_wa: Add support for Wa_14021768792 Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/i915/display: Add bits for Wa_14021768792 for linkm/n ratio > 10 Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14021768792 for BMG DP for link_m/n " Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drm/i915/dp: Extend intel_dp_can_support_m_n() for BMG M/N bypass Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:09 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/i915/dp: Bump the max Link M/N ratio to 22 for DISPLAY_VER >= 35 Suraj Kandpal
2026-09-16  9:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit (rev8) Patchwork
2026-09-16  9:55 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-16 11:30 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260916092330.2A0891F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox