Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jouni.hogander@intel.com, jeevan.b@intel.com,
	Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add debug interface for lobf
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:55:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jz9f7gsv.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224080847.326350-6-animesh.manna@intel.com>

On Mon, 24 Feb 2025, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> wrote:
> Add an interface in debugfs which will help in debugging LOBF
> feature.
>
> v1: Initial version.
> v2:
> - Remove FORCE_EN flag. [Jouni]
> - Change prefix from I915 to INTEL. [Jani]
> - Use u8 instead of bool for lobf-debug flag. [Jani]
>
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c     | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  5 ++
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index 83719ee1721c..5c70677ac3c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -276,6 +276,9 @@ void intel_alpm_lobf_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  	int waketime_in_lines, first_sdp_position;
>  	int context_latency, guardband;
>  
> +	if (intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lobf_debug & INTEL_LOBF_DEBUG_DISABLE)
> +		return;
> +
>  	if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -449,6 +452,51 @@ static int i915_edp_lobf_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  
>  DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(i915_edp_lobf_info);
>  
> +static int
> +i915_edp_lobf_debug_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> +{
> +	struct intel_display *display = data;

Where do you pass display as data? It's connector?

> +	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +	int ret = -ENODEV;
> +
> +	for_each_intel_dp(display->drm, encoder) {
> +		struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +
> +		if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> +			return ret;

What is this supposed to do?

> +
> +		// TODO: split to each edp transcoder.

What does this mean?

> +		*val = READ_ONCE(intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lobf_debug);

You read this from all intel_dp and combine into one? What?

> +		ret = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +i915_edp_lobf_debug_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> +	struct intel_display *display = data;
> +	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +	int ret = -ENODEV;
> +
> +	for_each_intel_dp(display->drm, encoder) {
> +		struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +
> +		if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		// TODO: split to each edp transcoder.
> +		intel_dp->alpm_parameters.lobf_debug = val;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;

So this always returns failure?

> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_edp_lobf_debug_fops,
> +			i915_edp_lobf_debug_get, i915_edp_lobf_debug_set,
> +			"%llu\n");
> +
>  void intel_alpm_lobf_debugfs_add(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(connector);
> @@ -458,6 +506,9 @@ void intel_alpm_lobf_debugfs_add(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	    connector->base.connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
>  		return;
>  
> +	debugfs_create_file("i915_edp_lobf_debug", 0644, root,
> +			    connector, &i915_edp_lobf_debug_fops);
> +
>  	debugfs_create_file("i915_edp_lobf_info", 0444, root,
>  			    connector, &i915_edp_lobf_info_fops);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index b78721c451b8..b6ec9a8fadd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1808,6 +1808,11 @@ struct intel_dp {
>  		u8 aux_less_wake_lines;
>  		u8 silence_period_sym_clocks;
>  		u8 lfps_half_cycle_num_of_syms;
> +
> +#define INTEL_LOBF_DEBUG_MODE_MASK		0x0f
> +#define INTEL_LOBF_DEBUG_DEFAULT		0x00
> +#define INTEL_LOBF_DEBUG_DISABLE		0x01
> +		u8 lobf_debug;

Just overly complex still.

>  	} alpm_parameters;
>  
>  	u8 alpm_dpcd;

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24  8:08 [PATCH v4 0/8] LOBF enablement fix Animesh Manna
2025-02-24  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add lobf enablement in post plane update Animesh Manna
2025-02-24 10:42   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25  8:23     ` Manna, Animesh
2025-02-24  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/i915/lobf: Disintegrate alpm_disable from psr_disable Animesh Manna
2025-02-24 10:45   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25  9:02     ` Manna, Animesh
2025-03-03  9:21       ` Manna, Animesh
2025-02-24  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add fixed refresh rate check in compute_config() Animesh Manna
2025-02-24 10:46   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25  8:25     ` Manna, Animesh
2025-02-24  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/i915/lobf: Update lobf if any change in dependent parameters Animesh Manna
2025-02-24 10:48   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25  6:41     ` Manna, Animesh
2025-02-25  8:02       ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25  8:22         ` Manna, Animesh
2025-02-24 10:49   ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25  4:09   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-24  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add debug interface for lobf Animesh Manna
2025-02-24 10:55   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-02-25  8:21     ` Manna, Animesh
2025-02-25  9:15       ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-24  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/i915/lobf: Check for sink error and disable LOBF Animesh Manna
2025-02-24  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add mutex for alpm update Animesh Manna
2025-02-26  8:11   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-02-24  8:08 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add debug print for LOBF Animesh Manna
2025-02-24 18:45 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for LOBF enablement fix (rev3) Patchwork
2025-02-24 18:45 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-24 18:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-24 19:03 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-24 19:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-24 19:07 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-24 19:38 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-24 20:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jz9f7gsv.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jeevan.b@intel.com \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox