Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Robert Krzemien <robert.krzemien@intel.com>,
	Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/10] Add OA functionality to Xe
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 19:41:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzu6xnlr.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230808013159.38811-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 18:31:49 -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>

Hi Umesh/Lionel,

> This patchset is the initial port of i915 perf/OA functionality to the Xe
> driver. It has been tested against the following IGT patch:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121082/
>
> The following features in i915 have not been ported and will be added (as
> new patches) if/as they are needed:
>
> * Inline batch submission on stream exec_queue/hw_engine
> * NOA wait

About these two in the "not-yet-ported" feature list for Xe: In
i915 when a stream engine is specified, requests are submitted "inline" to
that engine whenever the OA stream is opened or reconfigured. This feature
is at present not ported to Xe (see xe_oa_submit_bb()).

I have a couple of questions about this "inline submission":

* Is inline submission a hard requirement? That is, in Xe can UMD's say
  (completely outside OA uapi) fence till a segment of the workload
  completes, then open/reconfigure the OA stream and then continue? If
  UMD's are able to do this we don't need inline submission in Xe. If UMD's
  cannot do this please explain why not.

* If inline submission is indeed required, can we do away with NOA wait (as
  implemented in daed3e44396d ("drm/i915/perf: implement active wait for
  noa configurations")) or implement NOA wait differently in Xe? E.g. can
  we expose a fence in the OA uapi and UMD's would be required to wait on
  this fence/sync-object before continuing workload submissions after any
  OA stream open/reconfiguration.

The reason I am brining this up is because in i915 there are a couple of
scary bugs around this which are still unresolved. E.g.:

	https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8746
	https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8190

There is therefore reason to think if this functionality can be done
differently in Xe (not to say these bugs will be carried over to Xe).

Thanks.
--
Ashutosh

> * GuC ctx id (guc_sw_ctx_id)
> * CTX_R_PWR_CLK_STATE/GEN8_R_PWR_CLK_STATE
> * hold_preemption (DRM_XE_OA_PROP_HOLD_PREEMPTION)
> * sseu_config (DRM_XE_OA_PROP_GLOBAL_SSEU)
> * Override gucrc (override_gucrc_mode)
> * MTL bios_c6_setup
> * ratelimits
> * compat ioctl
>
> I am providing the following additional HAX patch (not part of this series)
> to help review these patches:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/551683/?series=120100&rev=4
>
> The commit message in the above patch explains how it can be useful for
> reviewing this series.
>
> Test-with: 20230808010017.37819-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com
>
> v2: Fix build
> v3: Rebase, due to s/xe_engine/xe_exec_queue/
>
> Ashutosh Dixit (10):
>   drm/xe/oa: Introduce OA uapi
>   drm/xe/oa: Add OA types
>   drm/xe/oa: Add registers and GPU commands used by OA
>   drm/xe/oa: Module init/exit and probe/remove
>   drm/xe/oa: Add/remove config ioctl's
>   drm/xe/oa: Start implementing OA stream open ioctl
>   drm/xe/oa: OA stream initialization
>   drm/xe/oa: Expose OA stream fd
>   drm/xe/oa: Read file_operation
>   drm/xe/oa: Implement queries
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile               |    1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h  |    5 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gpu_commands.h |   27 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_oa_regs.h      |  173 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c            |   16 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h      |    4 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h          |    4 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine_types.h   |    2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c            |    5 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c                | 2356 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.h                |   28 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h          |  295 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c             |    5 +-
>  include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h                 |  257 ++-
>  14 files changed, 3176 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_oa_regs.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.h
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa_types.h
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-08  2:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-08  1:31 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/10] Add OA functionality to Xe Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 01/10] drm/xe/oa: Introduce OA uapi Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-08 22:59   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-08-15 19:29     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-16  2:14       ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-08-21 16:48         ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-09-01  1:07           ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-15 22:03   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-16  1:11     ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-08-16  1:30       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-16  2:21         ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-08-16  3:43           ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-16 19:58             ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-08-16 20:38               ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-16 20:58                 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-21  4:48     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-22  8:31   ` Francois Dugast
2023-08-31 19:55     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-08-31 20:12       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-31 20:32         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-09-08  4:30       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 02/10] drm/xe/oa: Add OA types Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/10] drm/xe/oa: Add registers and GPU commands used by OA Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-22 15:44   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-08  4:30     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 04/10] drm/xe/oa: Module init/exit and probe/remove Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-22 15:52   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-08-23 19:41     ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-08-25  4:15       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 05/10] drm/xe/oa: Add/remove config ioctl's Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 06/10] drm/xe/oa: Start implementing OA stream open ioctl Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-23 19:55   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-08  4:38     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 07/10] drm/xe/oa: OA stream initialization Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 08/10] drm/xe/oa: Expose OA stream fd Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 09/10] drm/xe/oa: Read file_operation Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-23 19:46   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-09-08  4:40     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-08  1:31 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 10/10] drm/xe/oa: Implement queries Ashutosh Dixit
2023-08-22 15:55   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2023-08-08  2:04 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add OA functionality to Xe (rev3) Patchwork
2023-08-08  2:04 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-08  2:05 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-08-08  2:09 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-08-08  2:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-08-08  2:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-08  2:41 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2023-09-01  7:55   ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/10] Add OA functionality to Xe Lionel Landwerlin
2023-09-08  4:35     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-08-08  2:45 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure for Add OA functionality to Xe (rev3) Patchwork
2023-08-08  5:30 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add OA functionality to Xe (rev4) Patchwork
2023-08-08  5:30 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-08  5:31 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-08-08  5:35 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-08-08  5:35 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-08-08  5:36 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2023-08-08  6:10 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-21  0:29 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/10] Add OA functionality to Xe Ashutosh Dixit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzu6xnlr.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
    --cc=robert.krzemien@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox