From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
<ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>, <airlied@gmail.com>,
<simona@ffwll.ch>, <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] drm/xe: Correct BMG VSEC header sizing
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 15:57:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGLsR6rrszH0c7RS@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250627204321.521628-3-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 04:43:11PM -0400, Michael J. Ruhl wrote:
> The intel_vsec_header information for the crashlog feature is
> incorrect.
>
> Update the VSEC header with correct sizing and count.
>
> Since the crashlog entries are "merged" (num_entries = 2), the
> separate capabilities entries must be merged as well.
if you share some doc I might be able to help with reviews on this.
But for now,
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
to get this Xe patch merged with the rest of the series in the
PMT subsystem trees.
>
> Fixes: 0c45e76fcc62 ("drm/xe/vsec: Support BMG devices")
> Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c | 20 +++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> index 3e573b0b7ebd..67238fc57a4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vsec.c
> @@ -32,28 +32,18 @@ static struct intel_vsec_header bmg_telemetry = {
> .offset = BMG_DISCOVERY_OFFSET,
> };
>
> -static struct intel_vsec_header bmg_punit_crashlog = {
> - .length = 0x10,
> +static struct intel_vsec_header bmg_crashlog = {
> + .length = 0x18,
> .id = VSEC_ID_CRASHLOG,
> - .num_entries = 1,
> - .entry_size = 4,
> + .num_entries = 2,
> + .entry_size = 6,
> .tbir = 0,
> .offset = BMG_DISCOVERY_OFFSET + 0x60,
> };
>
> -static struct intel_vsec_header bmg_oobmsm_crashlog = {
> - .length = 0x10,
> - .id = VSEC_ID_CRASHLOG,
> - .num_entries = 1,
> - .entry_size = 4,
> - .tbir = 0,
> - .offset = BMG_DISCOVERY_OFFSET + 0x78,
> -};
> -
> static struct intel_vsec_header *bmg_capabilities[] = {
> &bmg_telemetry,
> - &bmg_punit_crashlog,
> - &bmg_oobmsm_crashlog,
> + &bmg_crashlog,
> NULL
> };
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-30 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 20:43 [PATCH v5 00/12] Crashlog Type1 Version2 support Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: fix a crashlog NULL pointer access Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-30 9:29 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-30 15:00 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] drm/xe: Correct BMG VSEC header sizing Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-30 19:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-06-30 22:00 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: white space cleanup Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: mutex clean up Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: use guard(mutex) Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: re-order trigger logic Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: correct types Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: decouple sysfs and namespace Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: add register access helpers Michael J. Ruhl
2025-07-02 15:50 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor base parameter Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: use a version struct Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-27 20:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] platform/x86/intel/pmt: support BMG crashlog Michael J. Ruhl
2025-06-30 20:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Crashlog Type1 Version2 support (rev5) Patchwork
2025-06-30 21:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-02 3:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGLsR6rrszH0c7RS@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox