From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/34] drm/xe/vf: Make VF recovery run on per-GT worker
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:35:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNRWIi9MqEghc4gM@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dab8b427-41eb-46b2-929d-436b3866b7b5@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:21:32PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>
>
> On 9/24/2025 9:50 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:49:25PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/24/2025 3:15 AM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> >>> VF recovery is a per-GT operation, so it makes sense to isolate it to a
> >>
> >> that was also my suggestion to make it per-GT, good to see it happen now
> >>
> >
> > +1
> >
> >>> per-GT queue. Scheduling this operation on the same worker as the GT
> >>> reset and TDR not only aligns with this design but also helps avoid race
> >>> conditions, as those operations can also modify the queue state.
> >>
> >> but while the recovery is per-GT, we should still protect against that
> >> one GT starts the recovery sooner then other GTs notice about it
> >>
> >
> > Yes. There is shared state in 2 places:
> >
> > - The GGTT shifting, this handled by [1] in my series.
> > - CCS restore on iGPU (PTL) handled by [2] [3] in my series.
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/676394/?series=154627&rev=2
> > [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/676393/?series=154627&rev=2
> > [3] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/676397/?series=154627&rev=2
> >
> >>>
> >>> v2:
> >>> - Fix lockdep splat (Adam)
> >>> - Use xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported helper
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c | 170 ++++++++++++++-
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.h | 3 +-
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h | 7 +
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c | 242 +---------------------
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h | 1 -
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_types.h | 4 -
> >>> 6 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 258 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> >>> index c9d0e32e7a15..cfb71b749e52 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> >>> @@ -25,11 +25,15 @@
> >>> #include "xe_guc.h"
> >>> #include "xe_guc_hxg_helpers.h"
> >>> #include "xe_guc_relay.h"
> >>> +#include "xe_guc_submit.h"
> >>> +#include "xe_irq.h"
> >>> #include "xe_lrc.h"
> >>> #include "xe_memirq.h"
> >>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
> >>> +#include "xe_pm.h"
> >>> #include "xe_sriov.h"
> >>> #include "xe_sriov_vf.h"
> >>> +#include "xe_tile_sriov_vf.h"
> >>> #include "xe_uc_fw.h"
> >>> #include "xe_wopcm.h"
> >>>
> >>> @@ -314,7 +318,7 @@ static int guc_action_vf_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_guc *guc)
> >>> * Returns: 0 if the operation completed successfully, or a negative error
> >>> * code otherwise.
> >>> */
> >>> -int xe_gt_sriov_vf_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> +static int xe_gt_sriov_vf_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> {
> >>> struct xe_guc *guc = >->uc.guc;
> >>> int err;
> >>> @@ -808,7 +812,7 @@ int xe_gt_sriov_vf_connect(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> * xe_gt_sriov_vf_default_lrcs_hwsp_rebase - Update GGTT references in HWSP of default LRCs.
> >>> * @gt: the &xe_gt struct instance
> >>> */
> >>> -void xe_gt_sriov_vf_default_lrcs_hwsp_rebase(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> +static void xe_gt_sriov_vf_default_lrcs_hwsp_rebase(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> {
> >>> struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
> >>> enum xe_hw_engine_id id;
> >>> @@ -817,6 +821,26 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_vf_default_lrcs_hwsp_rebase(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> xe_default_lrc_update_memirq_regs_with_address(hwe);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static void xe_gt_sriov_vf_start_migration_recovery(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>
> >> nit: if this is static then could be just:
> >>
> >> vf_start_migration_recovery(gt)
> >>
> >
> > Sure.
> >
> >>> +{
> >>> + bool started;
> >>> +
> >>> + xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(gt_to_xe(gt)));
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_queued) {
> >>> + gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_queued = true;
> >>> + WRITE_ONCE(gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_inprogress, true);
> >>> +
> >>> + started = queue_work(gt->ordered_wq, >->sriov.vf.migration.worker);
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_info(gt, "VF migration recovery %s\n", started ?
> >>> + "scheduled" : "already in progress");
> >>
> >> with this .recovery_queued flag, can we hit "already in progress" case?
> >>
> >
> > This was existing code so kept it but I'm really unclear how we can get
>
> I can't find "recovery_queued" flag in upstream code
>
This is akin to comment in upstream code. Again, I'm not really
convienced this is something we need to handle as I suspect this is not
possible.
/* skip asking GuC for RESFIX exit if new recovery request arrived */
> > multiple resfix IRQs without the prior resfix flow being completed.
> > Maybe Tomasz can clear this one up? Ideally I'd like to remove multiple
> > resfix IRQ handled code if this is not possible.
> >
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_unlock(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> /**
> >>> * xe_gt_sriov_vf_migrated_event_handler - Start a VF migration recovery,
> >>> * or just mark that a GuC is ready for it.
> >>> @@ -831,15 +855,8 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_vf_migrated_event_handler(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> xe_gt_assert(gt, IS_SRIOV_VF(xe));
> >>> xe_gt_assert(gt, xe_gt_sriov_vf_recovery_inprogress(gt));
> >>>
> >>> - set_bit(gt->info.id, &xe->sriov.vf.migration.gt_flags);
> >>> - /*
> >>> - * We need to be certain that if all flags were set, at least one
> >>> - * thread will notice that and schedule the recovery.
> >>> - */
> >>> - smp_mb__after_atomic();
> >>> -
> >>> xe_gt_sriov_info(gt, "ready for recovery after migration\n");
> >>> - xe_sriov_vf_start_migration_recovery(xe);
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_vf_start_migration_recovery(gt);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static bool vf_is_negotiated(struct xe_gt *gt, u16 major, u16 minor)
> >>> @@ -1175,6 +1192,139 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_vf_print_version(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> >>> pf_version->major, pf_version->minor);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static void vf_post_migration_shutdown(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int ret = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irq(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
> >>> + gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_queued = false;
> >>> + spin_unlock_irq(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
> >>> +
> >>> + xe_guc_submit_pause(>->uc.guc);
> >>> + ret |= xe_guc_submit_reset_block(>->uc.guc);
> >>
> >> this |= seem unneeded
> >>
> >
> > This is existing code copy / pasted and is removed in [4].
> >
> > [4] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/676382/?series=154627&rev=2
> >
> >>> +
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_info(gt, "migration recovery encountered ongoing reset\n");
> >>
> >> is this the only possible reason? maybe worth to add %pe ?
> >>
> >
> > Again this existing code and will be removed in [4].
> >
> > So with above statements, I'd prefer just to leave as is.
> >
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static size_t post_migration_scratch_size(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return max(xe_lrc_reg_size(xe), LRC_WA_BB_SIZE);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int vf_post_migration_fixups(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> +{
> >>> + s64 shift;
> >>> + void *buf;
> >>> + int err;
> >>> +
> >>> + buf = kmalloc(post_migration_scratch_size(gt_to_xe(gt)), GFP_ATOMIC);
> >>> + if (!buf)
> >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>> +
> >>> + err = xe_gt_sriov_vf_query_config(gt);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> +
> >>> + shift = xe_gt_sriov_vf_ggtt_shift(gt);
> >>> + if (shift) {
> >>> + xe_tile_sriov_vf_fixup_ggtt_nodes(gt_to_tile(gt), shift);
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_vf_default_lrcs_hwsp_rebase(gt);
> >>> + err = xe_guc_contexts_hwsp_rebase(>->uc.guc, buf);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> +out:
> >>> + kfree(buf);
> >>> + return err;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void vf_post_migration_kickstart(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Make sure interrupts on the new HW are properly set. The GuC IRQ
> >>> + * must be working at this point, since the recovery did started,
> >>> + * but the rest was not enabled using the procedure from spec.
> >>> + */
> >>> + xe_irq_resume(gt_to_xe(gt));
> >>> +
> >>> + xe_guc_submit_reset_unblock(>->uc.guc);
> >>> + xe_guc_submit_unpause(>->uc.guc);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> +{
> >>> + bool skip_resfix = false;
> >>> +
> >>> + spin_lock_irq(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
> >>> + if (gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_queued) {
> >>> + skip_resfix = true;
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_dbg(gt, "another recovery imminent, skipped some notifications\n");
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + WRITE_ONCE(gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_inprogress, false);
> >>> + }
> >>> + spin_unlock_irq(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
> >>> +
> >>> + return skip_resfix ? -EAGAIN : xe_gt_sriov_vf_notify_resfix_done(gt);
> >>
> >> nit: this looks cleaner:
> >>
> >> if (skip_resfix)
> >> return -EAGAIN;
> >>
> >> return xe_gt_sriov_vf_notify_resfix_done(gt);
> >>
> >
> > Sure.
> >
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void vf_post_migration_recovery(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> >>> + int err;
> >>> +
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_dbg(gt, "migration recovery in progress\n");
> >>> +
> >>> + xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> >>> + vf_post_migration_shutdown(gt);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(xe)) {
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "migration is not supported\n");
> >>> + err = -ENOTRECOVERABLE;
> >>> + goto fail;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + err = vf_post_migration_fixups(gt);
> >>> + if (err)
> >>> + goto fail;
> >>> +
> >>> + vf_post_migration_kickstart(gt);
> >>> + err = vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(gt);
> >>> + if (err && err != -EAGAIN)
> >>> + goto fail;
> >>> +
> >>> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_notice(gt, "migration recovery ended\n");
> >>> + return;
> >>> +fail:
> >>> + xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_err(gt, "migration recovery failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(err));
> >>> + xe_device_declare_wedged(xe);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void migration_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct xe_gt *gt = container_of(w, struct xe_gt,
> >>> + sriov.vf.migration.worker);
> >>> +
> >>> + vf_post_migration_recovery(gt);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration_init_early() - VF post migration init early
> >>> + * @gt: the &xe_gt
> >>> + */
> >>> +void xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration_init_early(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> +{
> >>> + init_rwsem(>->sriov.vf.self_config.lock);
> >>> + spin_lock_init(>->sriov.vf.migration.lock);
> >>> + INIT_WORK(>->sriov.vf.migration.worker, migration_worker_func);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(gt_to_xe(gt)))
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_info(gt, "migration not supported by this module version\n");
> >>
> >> we likely don't want to repeat that message on every GT
> >>
> >
> > So move this to xe_sriov_vf_init_early?
>
> hmm, maybe it is even already there
>
Let me check on that. Either way will remove this from the GT layer.
> >
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> /**
> >>> * xe_gt_sriov_vf_recovery_inprogress() - VF post migration recovery in progress
> >>> * @gt: the &xe_gt
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.h
> >>> index bb5f8eace19b..2ac6775b52f0 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.h
> >>> @@ -21,10 +21,9 @@ void xe_gt_sriov_vf_guc_versions(struct xe_gt *gt,
> >>> int xe_gt_sriov_vf_query_config(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>> int xe_gt_sriov_vf_connect(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>> int xe_gt_sriov_vf_query_runtime(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>> -void xe_gt_sriov_vf_default_lrcs_hwsp_rebase(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>> -int xe_gt_sriov_vf_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>> void xe_gt_sriov_vf_migrated_event_handler(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>>
> >>> +void xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration_init_early(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>> bool xe_gt_sriov_vf_recovery_inprogress(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>>
> >>> u32 xe_gt_sriov_vf_gmdid(struct xe_gt *gt);
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> >>> index 7b10b8e1e10e..53680a2f188a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h
> >>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> >>>
> >>> #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> >>> #include <linux/types.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >>> #include "xe_uc_fw_types.h"
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> @@ -53,6 +54,12 @@ struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_runtime {
> >>> * xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration - VF migration data.
> >>> */
> >>> struct xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration {
> >>> + /** @migration: VF migration recovery worker */
> >>> + struct work_struct worker;
> >>> + /** @lock: Protects recovery_queued */
> >>> + spinlock_t lock;
> >>> + /** @recovery_queued: VF post migration recovery in queued */
> >>> + bool recovery_queued;
> >>> /** @recovery_inprogress: VF post migration recovery in progress */
> >>> bool recovery_inprogress;
> >>> };
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> >>> index da064a1e7419..7d91553c4acc 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.c
> >>> @@ -6,21 +6,12 @@
> >>> #include <drm/drm_debugfs.h>
> >>> #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> >>>
> >>> -#include "xe_assert.h"
> >>> -#include "xe_device.h"
> >>> #include "xe_gt.h"
> >>> -#include "xe_gt_sriov_printk.h"
> >>> #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
> >>> #include "xe_guc.h"
> >>> -#include "xe_guc_submit.h"
> >>> -#include "xe_irq.h"
> >>> -#include "xe_lrc.h"
> >>> -#include "xe_pm.h"
> >>> -#include "xe_sriov.h"
> >>> #include "xe_sriov_printk.h"
> >>> #include "xe_sriov_vf.h"
> >>> #include "xe_sriov_vf_ccs.h"
> >>> -#include "xe_tile_sriov_vf.h"
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> * DOC: VF restore procedure in PF KMD and VF KMD
> >>> @@ -158,8 +149,6 @@ static void vf_disable_migration(struct xe_device *xe, const char *fmt, ...)
> >>> xe->sriov.vf.migration.enabled = false;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static void migration_worker_func(struct work_struct *w);
> >>> -
> >>> static void vf_migration_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> {
> >>> /*
> >>> @@ -184,8 +173,6 @@ static void vf_migration_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> guc_version.major, guc_version.minor);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - INIT_WORK(&xe->sriov.vf.migration.worker, migration_worker_func);
> >>> -
> >>> xe->sriov.vf.migration.enabled = true;
> >>> xe_sriov_dbg(xe, "migration support enabled\n");
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -200,238 +187,11 @@ void xe_sriov_vf_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> unsigned int id;
> >>>
> >>> for_each_gt(gt, xe, id)
> >>> - init_rwsem(>->sriov.vf.self_config.lock);
> >>> + xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration_init_early(gt);
> >>
> >> still, this should be called from gt_init_early kind of functions
> >>
> >
> > Kinda a nit that I'm not convinced is worth while to have
> > xe_sriov_vf_init_early and then xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration_init_early
> > called in gt_init_early...
>
> we have global xe level initialization, something like:
>
> xe_device_init_early
> xe_sriov_vf_init_early
> xe_device_init
> xe_sriov_vf_init
>
> then per-gt initialization, that follows the native flow, something like
>
> xe_gt_init_early
> xe_gt_sriov_vf_init_early
> xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration_init_early
> xe_gt_init
> xe_gt_sriov_vf_init
> xe_gt_sriov_vf_migration_init
>
> IMO we shouldn't jump in sriov code from xe level to gt level init on our own
>
Ok, let me refactor this. Easy enough to do.
Matt
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >>>
> >>> vf_migration_init_early(xe);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -/**
> >>> - * vf_post_migration_shutdown - Stop the driver activities after VF migration.
> >>> - * @xe: the &xe_device struct instance
> >>> - *
> >>> - * After this VM is migrated and assigned to a new VF, it is running on a new
> >>> - * hardware, and therefore many hardware-dependent states and related structures
> >>> - * require fixups. Without fixups, the hardware cannot do any work, and therefore
> >>> - * all GPU pipelines are stalled.
> >>> - * Stop some of kernel activities to make the fixup process faster.
> >>> - */
> >>> -static void vf_post_migration_shutdown(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> -{
> >>> - struct xe_gt *gt;
> >>> - unsigned int id;
> >>> - int ret = 0;
> >>> -
> >>> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> >>> - xe_guc_submit_pause(>->uc.guc);
> >>> - ret |= xe_guc_submit_reset_block(>->uc.guc);
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> - if (ret)
> >>> - drm_info(&xe->drm, "migration recovery encountered ongoing reset\n");
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -/**
> >>> - * vf_post_migration_kickstart - Re-start the driver activities under new hardware.
> >>> - * @xe: the &xe_device struct instance
> >>> - *
> >>> - * After we have finished with all post-migration fixups, restart the driver
> >>> - * activities to continue feeding the GPU with workloads.
> >>> - */
> >>> -static void vf_post_migration_kickstart(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> -{
> >>> - struct xe_gt *gt;
> >>> - unsigned int id;
> >>> -
> >>> - /*
> >>> - * Make sure interrupts on the new HW are properly set. The GuC IRQ
> >>> - * must be working at this point, since the recovery did started,
> >>> - * but the rest was not enabled using the procedure from spec.
> >>> - */
> >>> - xe_irq_resume(xe);
> >>> -
> >>> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> >>> - xe_guc_submit_reset_unblock(>->uc.guc);
> >>> - xe_guc_submit_unpause(>->uc.guc);
> >>> - }
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -static bool gt_vf_post_migration_needed(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> -{
> >>> - return test_bit(gt->info.id, >_to_xe(gt)->sriov.vf.migration.gt_flags);
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -/*
> >>> - * Notify GuCs marked in flags about resource fixups apply finished.
> >>> - * @xe: the &xe_device struct instance
> >>> - * @gt_flags: flags marking to which GTs the notification shall be sent
> >>> - */
> >>> -static int vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(struct xe_device *xe, unsigned long gt_flags)
> >>> -{
> >>> - struct xe_gt *gt;
> >>> - unsigned int id;
> >>> - int err = 0;
> >>> -
> >>> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> >>> - if (!test_bit(id, >_flags))
> >>> - continue;
> >>> - /* skip asking GuC for RESFIX exit if new recovery request arrived */
> >>> - if (gt_vf_post_migration_needed(gt))
> >>> - continue;
> >>> - err = xe_gt_sriov_vf_notify_resfix_done(gt);
> >>> - if (err)
> >>> - break;
> >>> - clear_bit(id, >_flags);
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> - if (gt_flags && !err)
> >>> - drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "another recovery imminent, skipped some notifications\n");
> >>> - return err;
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -static int vf_get_next_migrated_gt_id(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> -{
> >>> - struct xe_gt *gt;
> >>> - unsigned int id;
> >>> -
> >>> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> >>> - if (test_and_clear_bit(id, &xe->sriov.vf.migration.gt_flags))
> >>> - return id;
> >>> - }
> >>> - return -1;
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -static size_t post_migration_scratch_size(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> -{
> >>> - return max(xe_lrc_reg_size(xe), LRC_WA_BB_SIZE);
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -/**
> >>> - * Perform post-migration fixups on a single GT.
> >>> - *
> >>> - * After migration, GuC needs to be re-queried for VF configuration to check
> >>> - * if it matches previous provisioning. Most of VF provisioning shall be the
> >>> - * same, except GGTT range, since GGTT is not virtualized per-VF. If GGTT
> >>> - * range has changed, we have to perform fixups - shift all GGTT references
> >>> - * used anywhere within the driver. After the fixups in this function succeed,
> >>> - * it is allowed to ask the GuC bound to this GT to continue normal operation.
> >>> - *
> >>> - * Returns: 0 if the operation completed successfully, or a negative error
> >>> - * code otherwise.
> >>> - */
> >>> -static int gt_vf_post_migration_fixups(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >>> -{
> >>> - s64 shift;
> >>> - void *buf;
> >>> - int err;
> >>> -
> >>> - buf = kmalloc(post_migration_scratch_size(gt_to_xe(gt)), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> - if (!buf)
> >>> - return -ENOMEM;
> >>> -
> >>> - err = xe_gt_sriov_vf_query_config(gt);
> >>> - if (err)
> >>> - goto out;
> >>> -
> >>> - shift = xe_gt_sriov_vf_ggtt_shift(gt);
> >>> - if (shift) {
> >>> - xe_tile_sriov_vf_fixup_ggtt_nodes(gt_to_tile(gt), shift);
> >>> - xe_gt_sriov_vf_default_lrcs_hwsp_rebase(gt);
> >>> - err = xe_guc_contexts_hwsp_rebase(>->uc.guc, buf);
> >>> - if (err)
> >>> - goto out;
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> -out:
> >>> - kfree(buf);
> >>> - return err;
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -static void vf_post_migration_recovery(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> -{
> >>> - unsigned long fixed_gts = 0;
> >>> - int id, err;
> >>> -
> >>> - drm_dbg(&xe->drm, "migration recovery in progress\n");
> >>> - xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> >>> - vf_post_migration_shutdown(xe);
> >>> -
> >>> - if (!xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(xe)) {
> >>> - xe_sriov_err(xe, "migration is not supported\n");
> >>> - err = -ENOTRECOVERABLE;
> >>> - goto fail;
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> - while (id = vf_get_next_migrated_gt_id(xe), id >= 0) {
> >>> - struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, id);
> >>> -
> >>> - err = gt_vf_post_migration_fixups(gt);
> >>> - if (err)
> >>> - goto fail;
> >>> -
> >>> - set_bit(id, &fixed_gts);
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> - vf_post_migration_kickstart(xe);
> >>> - err = vf_post_migration_notify_resfix_done(xe, fixed_gts);
> >>> - if (err)
> >>> - goto fail;
> >>> -
> >>> - xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> >>> - drm_notice(&xe->drm, "migration recovery ended\n");
> >>> - return;
> >>> -fail:
> >>> - xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> >>> - drm_err(&xe->drm, "migration recovery failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(err));
> >>> - xe_device_declare_wedged(xe);
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -static void migration_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
> >>> -{
> >>> - struct xe_device *xe = container_of(w, struct xe_device,
> >>> - sriov.vf.migration.worker);
> >>> -
> >>> - vf_post_migration_recovery(xe);
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -/*
> >>> - * Check if post-restore recovery is coming on any of GTs.
> >>> - * @xe: the &xe_device struct instance
> >>> - *
> >>> - * Return: True if migration recovery worker will soon be running. Any worker currently
> >>> - * executing does not affect the result.
> >>> - */
> >>> -static bool vf_ready_to_recovery_on_any_gts(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> -{
> >>> - struct xe_gt *gt;
> >>> - unsigned int id;
> >>> -
> >>> - for_each_gt(gt, xe, id) {
> >>> - if (test_bit(id, &xe->sriov.vf.migration.gt_flags))
> >>> - return true;
> >>> - }
> >>> - return false;
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> -/**
> >>> - * xe_sriov_vf_start_migration_recovery - Start VF migration recovery.
> >>> - * @xe: the &xe_device to start recovery on
> >>> - *
> >>> - * This function shall be called only by VF.
> >>> - */
> >>> -void xe_sriov_vf_start_migration_recovery(struct xe_device *xe)
> >>> -{
> >>> - bool started;
> >>> -
> >>> - xe_assert(xe, IS_SRIOV_VF(xe));
> >>> -
> >>> - if (!vf_ready_to_recovery_on_any_gts(xe))
> >>> - return;
> >>> -
> >>> - started = queue_work(xe->sriov.wq, &xe->sriov.vf.migration.worker);
> >>> - drm_info(&xe->drm, "VF migration recovery %s\n", started ?
> >>> - "scheduled" : "already in progress");
> >>> -}
> >>> -
> >>> /**
> >>> * xe_sriov_vf_init_late() - SR-IOV VF late initialization functions.
> >>> * @xe: the &xe_device to initialize
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
> >>> index 9e752105ec2a..4df95266b261 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf.h
> >>> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ struct xe_device;
> >>>
> >>> void xe_sriov_vf_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
> >>> int xe_sriov_vf_init_late(struct xe_device *xe);
> >>> -void xe_sriov_vf_start_migration_recovery(struct xe_device *xe);
> >>> bool xe_sriov_vf_migration_supported(struct xe_device *xe);
> >>> void xe_sriov_vf_debugfs_register(struct xe_device *xe, struct dentry *root);
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_types.h
> >>> index 426cc5841958..6a0fd0f5463e 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_types.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sriov_vf_types.h
> >>> @@ -33,10 +33,6 @@ struct xe_device_vf {
> >>>
> >>> /** @migration: VF Migration state data */
> >>> struct {
> >>> - /** @migration.worker: VF migration recovery worker */
> >>> - struct work_struct worker;
> >>> - /** @migration.gt_flags: Per-GT request flags for VF migration recovery */
> >>> - unsigned long gt_flags;
> >>> /**
> >>> * @migration.enabled: flag indicating if migration support
> >>> * was enabled or not due to missing prerequisites
> >>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 1:15 [PATCH v2 00/34] VF migration redesign Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/34] drm/xe/vf: Lock querying GGTT config during driver init Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 9:29 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:23 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-30 0:42 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] Revert "drm/xe/vf: Rebase exec queue parallel commands during migration recovery" Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 9:32 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:17 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] Revert "drm/xe/vf: Post migration, repopulate ring area for pending request" Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] Revert "drm/xe/vf: Fixup CTB send buffer messages after migration" Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] drm/xe: Save off position in ring in which a job was programmed Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] drm/xe/guc: Track pending-enable source in submission state Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] drm/xe: Track LR jobs in DRM scheduler pending list Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] drm/xe: Don't change LRC ring head on job resubmission Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 15:14 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-25 16:12 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] drm/xe: Make LRC W/A scratch buffer usage consistent Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 14:23 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-24 18:01 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-09-25 20:25 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] drm/xe/guc: Document GuC submission backend Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 9:35 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:20 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] drm/xe/vf: Add xe_gt_sriov_vf_recovery_inprogress helper Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 10:14 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 19:39 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 20:12 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:30 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] drm/xe/vf: Make VF recovery run on per-GT worker Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 10:49 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 19:50 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 20:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:35 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-09-25 16:27 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-25 16:56 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] drm/xe/vf: Abort H2G sends during VF post-migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 11:00 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:01 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] drm/xe/vf: Remove memory allocations from VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-09-26 1:35 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-26 1:43 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] drm/xe/vf: Close multi-GT GGTT shift race Matthew Brost
2025-09-26 2:33 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-26 19:09 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] drm/xe/vf: Teardown VF post migration worker on driver unload Matthew Brost
2025-09-26 15:40 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-26 19:13 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] drm/xe/vf: Don't allow GT reset to be queued during VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-09-27 2:59 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-27 22:33 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] drm/xe/vf: Wakeup in GuC backend on " Matthew Brost
2025-09-25 19:06 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] drm/xe/vf: Extra debug on GGTT shift Matthew Brost
2025-09-27 3:16 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-27 11:06 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-27 22:56 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] drm/xe/vf: Use GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT for GuC context register Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 11:15 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:16 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] drm/xe/vf: Stop and flush CTs in VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 11:21 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:12 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] drm/xe/vf: Reset TLB invalidations during " Matthew Brost
2025-09-27 3:43 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-27 22:29 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] drm/xe/vf: Kickstart after resfix in " Matthew Brost
2025-09-27 11:21 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] drm/xe/vf: Start CTs before resfix " Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 11:50 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-09-24 20:10 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] drm/xe/vf: Abort VF post migration recovery on failure Matthew Brost
2025-09-27 11:54 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-27 22:38 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] drm/xe/vf: Replay GuC submission state on pause / unpause Matthew Brost
2025-09-27 13:33 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-09-27 23:11 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] drm/xe: Move queue init before LRC creation Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] drm/xe/vf: Add debug prints for GuC replaying state during VF recovery Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] drm/xe/vf: Workaround for race condition in GuC firmware during VF pause Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] drm/xe: Use PPGTT addresses for TLB invalidation to avoid GGTT fixups Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] drm/xe/vf: Use primary GT ordered work queue on media GT on PTL VF Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] drm/xe/vf: Ensure media GT VF recovery runs after primary GT on PTL Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:16 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] drm/xe/vf: Rebase CCS save/restore BB GGTT addresses Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 4:04 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-09-24 6:32 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 6:36 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-09-24 1:16 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] drm/xe/guc: Increase wait timeout to 2sec after BUSY reply from GuC Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 1:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for VF migration redesign (rev2) Patchwork
2025-09-24 2:14 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-24 7:37 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNRWIi9MqEghc4gM@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
--to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox