Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Manna,  Animesh" <animesh.manna@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>, "B, Jeevan" <jeevan.b@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/8] drm/i915/lobf: Update lobf if any change in dependent parameters
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 07:54:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1269259cd440a03f0e7dc210d1fa76109c6fb85.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250403092825.484347-6-animesh.manna@intel.com>

On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 14:58 +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> For every commit the dependent condition for LOBF is checked
> and accordingly update has_lobf flag which will be used
> to update the ALPM_CTL register during commit.
> 
> v1: Initial version.
> v2: Avoid reading h/w register without has_lobf check. [Jani]
> v3: Update LOBF in post plane update instead of separate function.
> [Jouni]
> v4:
> - Add lobf disable print. [Jouni]
> - Simplify condition check for enabling/disabling lobf. [Jouni]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> index aae2c322baa7..7ab29c5fef38 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_alpm.c
> @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void lnl_alpm_configure(struct intel_dp
> *intel_dp,
>  	if (crtc_state->has_lobf) {
>  		alpm_ctl |= ALPM_CTL_LOBF_ENABLE;
>  		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Link off between frames
> (LOBF) enabled\n");
> +	} else {
> +		drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Link off between frames
> (LOBF) disabled\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	alpm_ctl |= ALPM_CTL_ALPM_ENTRY_CHECK(intel_dp-
> >alpm_parameters.check_entry_lines);
> @@ -380,9 +382,12 @@ void intel_alpm_post_plane_update(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
>  	const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
>  		intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +	const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state =
> +		intel_atomic_get_old_crtc_state(state, crtc);
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
>  
> -	if (!crtc_state->has_lobf && !crtc_state->has_psr)
> +	if (!(crtc_state->has_lobf != old_crtc_state->has_lobf) &&

I usually support artistic freedom... I think here you should really do
 
crtc_state->has_lobf == old_crtc_state->has_lobf

BR,

Jouni Högander


> +	    !crtc_state->has_psr)
>  		return;
>  
>  	for_each_intel_encoder_mask(display->drm, encoder,


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-08  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-03  9:28 [PATCH v7 0/8] LOBF enablement fix Animesh Manna
2025-04-03  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add lobf enablement in post plane update Animesh Manna
2025-04-03  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add debug print for LOBF Animesh Manna
2025-04-08  7:49   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-04-08  7:57     ` Manna, Animesh
2025-04-08  7:58       ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-04-03  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] drm/i915/lobf: Disintegrate alpm_disable from psr_disable Animesh Manna
2025-04-08  7:51   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-04-03  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add fixed refresh rate check in compute_config() Animesh Manna
2025-04-03  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] drm/i915/lobf: Update lobf if any change in dependent parameters Animesh Manna
2025-04-08  7:54   ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2025-04-08  8:01     ` Manna, Animesh
2025-04-03  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add debug interface for lobf Animesh Manna
2025-04-08  8:01   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-04-03  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] drm/i915/lobf: Add mutex for alpm update Animesh Manna
2025-04-03  9:28 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] drm/i915/lobf: Check for sink error and disable LOBF Animesh Manna
2025-04-08  8:14   ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-04-03  9:56 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for LOBF enablement fix (rev6) Patchwork
2025-04-03  9:57 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-03  9:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-03 10:14 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-03 10:17 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-03 10:18 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-03 10:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-04-03 13:32 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f1269259cd440a03f0e7dc210d1fa76109c6fb85.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jeevan.b@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox