From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe/vf: Custom HuC initialization if VF
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 01:14:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fff7c121-5b1c-4433-bfe8-403f685a889a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZnNloxEj2yHTYahZ@DUT025-TGLU.fm.intel.com>
On 20.06.2024 01:11, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:45:57PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> The HuC firmware is loaded and initialized by the PF driver. Make
>> sure VF driver performs only limited data structure initialization.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
>> index 6238fb354914..c88761fe31c9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_huc.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> #include "xe_guc.h"
>> #include "xe_map.h"
>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>> +#include "xe_sriov.h"
>> #include "xe_uc_fw.h"
>>
>> static struct xe_gt *
>> @@ -92,6 +93,9 @@ int xe_huc_init(struct xe_huc *huc)
>> if (!xe_uc_fw_is_enabled(&huc->fw))
>> return 0;
>>
>> + if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>
> With this change I assume the main part of xe_huc_auth is never called
> on a VF?
>
> Does xe_uc_fw_is_loadable return false on a VF?
yes, as on VF it is marked as PRELOADED, so:
static inline bool xe_uc_fw_is_loadable(struct xe_uc_fw *uc_fw)
{
return __xe_uc_fw_status(uc_fw) >= XE_UC_FIRMWARE_LOADABLE &&
__xe_uc_fw_status(uc_fw) != XE_UC_FIRMWARE_PRELOADED;
}
returns false
>
> Matt
>
>> if (huc->fw.has_gsc_headers) {
>> ret = huc_alloc_gsc_pkt(huc);
>> if (ret)
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 21:45 [PATCH 0/9] Adapt the driver to boot on the VF device Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe/vf: Disable features that do not apply to VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 9:17 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-06-20 10:05 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 10:01 ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 10:06 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe/vf: Don't run any save-restore RTP actions if VF Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 9:20 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-06-20 17:30 ` Matt Roper
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/xe/vf: Don't apply tile workarounds " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 9:21 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-06-20 17:31 ` Matt Roper
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe/vf: Don't change hwe IRQ masks if using memory IRQs Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 9:29 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/vf: Don't initialize OA if VF Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-19 21:56 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-06-19 22:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-06-19 22:40 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-19 22:57 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2024-06-19 23:01 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe/vf: Don't support gtidle " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 9:38 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe/vf: Don't use register based TLB invalidation " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-19 23:13 ` Matthew Brost
2024-06-19 23:25 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 10:07 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe/vf: Skip engine ring enabling " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 10:03 ` Piotr Piórkowski
2024-06-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe/vf: Custom HuC initialization " Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-19 23:11 ` Matthew Brost
2024-06-19 23:14 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2024-06-19 23:23 ` Matthew Brost
2024-06-19 23:34 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 1:59 ` Matthew Brost
2024-06-19 21:51 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Adapt the driver to boot on the VF device Patchwork
2024-06-19 21:51 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-19 21:52 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-19 22:04 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-19 22:06 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-19 22:07 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-19 22:22 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-20 6:28 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 6:16 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 6:28 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Adapt the driver to boot on the VF device (rev2) Patchwork
2024-06-20 6:28 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 6:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 6:41 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 6:43 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-20 6:44 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-20 7:01 ` ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 8:32 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-20 10:09 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Adapt the driver to boot on the VF device (rev3) Patchwork
2024-06-20 10:09 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 10:10 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 10:22 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 10:24 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-20 10:26 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2024-06-20 10:52 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-06-20 14:29 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-06-20 13:01 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-06-20 14:32 ` Michal Wajdeczko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fff7c121-5b1c-4433-bfe8-403f685a889a@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox