* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage
@ 2025-06-05 19:26 Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB Sean Christopherson
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, Sean Christopherson, Chao Gao
Add test coverage for SPEC_CTRL, which detects the bug pointed by Chao[1]
when running on hosts with V_SPEC_CTRL.
Note, this applies on top of the X86_FEATURE_XXX cleanup[2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aEE4BEHAHdhNTGoG@intel.com
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250529221929.3807680-1-seanjc@google.com
Sean Christopherson (3):
x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB
x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as
expected
x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases
lib/x86/msr.h | 8 ++++++--
lib/x86/processor.h | 10 ++++++++--
x86/msr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
x86/unittests.cfg | 7 +++++++
4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
base-commit: a93196db8339df0c09d900f9a465820a9d932c1b
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB
2025-06-05 19:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-05 19:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected Sean Christopherson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, Sean Christopherson, Chao Gao
The PRED_CMD MSR also exists if the CPU supports SBPB.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
lib/x86/processor.h | 1 +
x86/msr.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
index b656ebf6..9e3659d4 100644
--- a/lib/x86/processor.h
+++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
#define X86_FEATURE_SME_COHERENT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000001F, 0, EAX, 10)
#define X86_FEATURE_DEBUG_SWAP X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000001F, 0, EAX, 14)
#define X86_FEATURE_SVSM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000001F, 0, EAX, 28)
+#define X86_FEATURE_SBPB X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000021, 0, EAX, 27)
#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2 X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000022, 0, EAX, 0)
/*
diff --git a/x86/msr.c b/x86/msr.c
index f582a584..ac12d127 100644
--- a/x86/msr.c
+++ b/x86/msr.c
@@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static void test_cmd_msrs(void)
test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD");
if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) ||
- this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB)) {
+ this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB) ||
+ this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SBPB)) {
test_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD", 0);
test_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD", PRED_CMD_IBPB);
} else {
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected
2025-06-05 19:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-05 19:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-06 12:44 ` Chao Gao
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 22:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, Sean Christopherson, Chao Gao
Verify that SPEC_CTRL can be read when it should exist, #GPs on all reads
and writes does not exist, and that various bits can be set when they're
supported.
Opportunistically define more AMD mitigation features.
Cc: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
lib/x86/msr.h | 8 ++++++--
lib/x86/processor.h | 9 +++++++--
x86/msr.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/x86/msr.h b/lib/x86/msr.h
index ccfd6bdd..cc4cb855 100644
--- a/lib/x86/msr.h
+++ b/lib/x86/msr.h
@@ -32,8 +32,12 @@
#define EFER_FFXSR (1<<_EFER_FFXSR)
/* Intel MSRs. Some also available on other CPUs */
-#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
-#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049
+#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
+#define SPEC_CTRL_IBRS BIT(0)
+#define SPEC_CTRL_STIBP BIT(1)
+#define SPEC_CTRL_SSBD BIT(2)
+
+#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049
#define PRED_CMD_IBPB BIT(0)
#define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b
diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
index 9e3659d4..cbfaa018 100644
--- a/lib/x86/processor.h
+++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
@@ -288,13 +288,13 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
#define X86_FEATURE_LA57 X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 16)
#define X86_FEATURE_RDPID X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 22)
#define X86_FEATURE_SHSTK X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 7)
+#define X86_FEATURE_PKS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 31)
#define X86_FEATURE_IBT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 20)
#define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 26)
#define X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 28)
#define X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 29)
-#define X86_FEATURE_PKS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 31)
+#define X86_FEATURE_SSBD X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 31)
#define X86_FEATURE_LAM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 1, EAX, 26)
-
/*
* KVM defined leafs
*/
@@ -312,6 +312,11 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
#define X86_FEATURE_LM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 29)
#define X86_FEATURE_RDPRU X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 4)
#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 12)
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 14)
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 15)
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP_ALWAYS_ON X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 17)
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS_SAME_MODE X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 19)
+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 24)
#define X86_FEATURE_NPT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 0)
#define X86_FEATURE_LBRV X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 1)
#define X86_FEATURE_NRIPS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 3)
diff --git a/x86/msr.c b/x86/msr.c
index ac12d127..ca265fac 100644
--- a/x86/msr.c
+++ b/x86/msr.c
@@ -290,10 +290,37 @@ static void test_x2apic_msrs(void)
__test_x2apic_msrs(true);
}
-static void test_cmd_msrs(void)
+static void test_mitigation_msrs(void)
{
+ u64 spec_ctrl_bits = 0, val;
int i;
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS))
+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_IBRS;
+
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP))
+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
+
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SSBD) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD;
+
+ if (spec_ctrl_bits) {
+ for (val = 0; val <= spec_ctrl_bits; val++) {
+ /*
+ * Test only values that are guaranteed not to fault,
+ * virtualization of SPEC_CTRL has myriad holes that
+ * won't be ever closed.
+ */
+ if ((val & spec_ctrl_bits) != val)
+ continue;
+
+ test_msr_rw(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL", val);
+ }
+ } else {
+ test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL");
+ test_wrmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL", 0);
+ }
+
test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD");
if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) ||
this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB) ||
@@ -332,7 +359,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
test_misc_msrs();
test_mce_msrs();
test_x2apic_msrs();
- test_cmd_msrs();
+ test_mitigation_msrs();
}
return report_summary();
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases
2025-06-05 19:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-05 19:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 22:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-05 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, Sean Christopherson, Chao Gao
Add "msr64" to run the MSR test with a CPU model of "qemu64" instead of
"max" to provide coverage for MSRs that exist in the underlying hardware,
but not in the guest's CPU model.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
x86/unittests.cfg | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/x86/unittests.cfg b/x86/unittests.cfg
index a0eef541..a2b351ff 100644
--- a/x86/unittests.cfg
+++ b/x86/unittests.cfg
@@ -171,6 +171,13 @@ arch = x86_64
file = msr.flat
extra_params = -cpu max,vendor=GenuineIntel
+[msr64]
+# Same as above, but with a minimal 64-bit CPU model to validate cases where an
+# MSR is supported in the underlying hardware, but not the guest's CPU model.
+arch = x86_64
+file = msr.flat
+extra_params = -cpu qemu64,vendor=GenuineIntel
+
[pmu]
file = pmu.flat
extra_params = -cpu max
--
2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-06 12:44 ` Chao Gao
2025-06-06 22:54 ` Sean Christopherson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chao Gao @ 2025-06-06 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 12:26:42PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>Verify that SPEC_CTRL can be read when it should exist, #GPs on all reads
>and writes does not exist, and that various bits can be set when they're
>supported.
>
>Opportunistically define more AMD mitigation features.
>
>Cc: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>---
> lib/x86/msr.h | 8 ++++++--
> lib/x86/processor.h | 9 +++++++--
> x86/msr.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/lib/x86/msr.h b/lib/x86/msr.h
>index ccfd6bdd..cc4cb855 100644
>--- a/lib/x86/msr.h
>+++ b/lib/x86/msr.h
>@@ -32,8 +32,12 @@
> #define EFER_FFXSR (1<<_EFER_FFXSR)
>
> /* Intel MSRs. Some also available on other CPUs */
>-#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
>-#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049
>+#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_IBRS BIT(0)
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_STIBP BIT(1)
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_SSBD BIT(2)
>+
>+#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049
> #define PRED_CMD_IBPB BIT(0)
>
> #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b
>diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
>index 9e3659d4..cbfaa018 100644
>--- a/lib/x86/processor.h
>+++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
>@@ -288,13 +288,13 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
> #define X86_FEATURE_LA57 X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 16)
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDPID X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 22)
> #define X86_FEATURE_SHSTK X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 7)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_PKS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 31)
> #define X86_FEATURE_IBT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 20)
> #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 26)
> #define X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 28)
> #define X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 29)
>-#define X86_FEATURE_PKS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 31)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_SSBD X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 31)
nit: looks adding a tab after "#define" is the convention in this file
> #define X86_FEATURE_LAM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 1, EAX, 26)
>-
> /*
> * KVM defined leafs
> */
>@@ -312,6 +312,11 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
> #define X86_FEATURE_LM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 29)
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDPRU X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 4)
> #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 12)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 14)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 15)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP_ALWAYS_ON X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 17)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS_SAME_MODE X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 19)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 24)
ditto
> #define X86_FEATURE_NPT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 0)
> #define X86_FEATURE_LBRV X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 1)
> #define X86_FEATURE_NRIPS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 3)
>diff --git a/x86/msr.c b/x86/msr.c
>index ac12d127..ca265fac 100644
>--- a/x86/msr.c
>+++ b/x86/msr.c
>@@ -290,10 +290,37 @@ static void test_x2apic_msrs(void)
> __test_x2apic_msrs(true);
> }
>
>-static void test_cmd_msrs(void)
>+static void test_mitigation_msrs(void)
> {
>+ u64 spec_ctrl_bits = 0, val;
> int i;
>
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_IBRS;
>+
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EDX[26] enumerates IBRS and IBPB support, but it doesn't
enumerate STIBP support. EDX[27] does.
Aside from this, the patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>+
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SSBD) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD;
>+
>+ if (spec_ctrl_bits) {
>+ for (val = 0; val <= spec_ctrl_bits; val++) {
>+ /*
>+ * Test only values that are guaranteed not to fault,
>+ * virtualization of SPEC_CTRL has myriad holes that
>+ * won't be ever closed.
>+ */
>+ if ((val & spec_ctrl_bits) != val)
>+ continue;
>+
>+ test_msr_rw(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL", val);
>+ }
>+ } else {
>+ test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL");
>+ test_wrmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL", 0);
>+ }
>+
> test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD");
> if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) ||
> this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB) ||
>@@ -332,7 +359,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> test_misc_msrs();
> test_mce_msrs();
> test_x2apic_msrs();
>- test_cmd_msrs();
>+ test_mitigation_msrs();
> }
>
> return report_summary();
>--
>2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected
2025-06-06 12:44 ` Chao Gao
@ 2025-06-06 22:54 ` Sean Christopherson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-06 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Gao; +Cc: Paolo Bonzini, kvm
On Fri, Jun 06, 2025, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 12:26:42PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >diff --git a/x86/msr.c b/x86/msr.c
> >index ac12d127..ca265fac 100644
> >--- a/x86/msr.c
> >+++ b/x86/msr.c
> >@@ -290,10 +290,37 @@ static void test_x2apic_msrs(void)
> > __test_x2apic_msrs(true);
> > }
> >
> >-static void test_cmd_msrs(void)
> >+static void test_mitigation_msrs(void)
> > {
> >+ u64 spec_ctrl_bits = 0, val;
> > int i;
> >
> >+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS))
> >+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_IBRS;
> >+
> >+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP))
> >+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
>
> CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EDX[26] enumerates IBRS and IBPB support, but it doesn't
> enumerate STIBP support. EDX[27] does.
Drat, that's what I get for trying to reverse engineer the kernel's mitigations.
It's super obvious when I actually look at the CPUID feature definitions.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage
2025-06-05 19:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases Sean Christopherson
@ 2025-06-25 22:25 ` Sean Christopherson
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sean Christopherson @ 2025-06-25 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Christopherson, Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kvm, Chao Gao
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 12:26:40 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Add test coverage for SPEC_CTRL, which detects the bug pointed by Chao[1]
> when running on hosts with V_SPEC_CTRL.
>
> Note, this applies on top of the X86_FEATURE_XXX cleanup[2].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aEE4BEHAHdhNTGoG@intel.com
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250529221929.3807680-1-seanjc@google.com
>
> [...]
Applied to kvm-x86 next, with X86_FEATURE_STIBP gating STIBP (thanks Chao!).
[1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB
https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/commit/5cd94b1b09aa
[2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected
https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/commit/70445405573d
[3/3] x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases
https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/commit/55c6fc875a60
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/kvm-unit-tests/tree/next
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-25 22:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-05 19:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected Sean Christopherson
2025-06-06 12:44 ` Chao Gao
2025-06-06 22:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 22:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox