Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com>,
	Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 11:41:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623184201.1518871-11-oupton@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184201.1518871-1-oupton@kernel.org>

Pass sufficient context to the stage-1 walk such that access-dependent
features like FEAT_HAFDBS can implement the correct behavior.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h |  4 +++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/at.c                 | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c             | 10 ++++++---
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
index 71814c4aac3e..347d79fd350c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
@@ -112,6 +112,8 @@ struct kvm_walk_access {
 		WALK_ACCESS_CMO,
 		WALK_ACCESS_AT,
 		WALK_ACCESS_S1PTW,
+		WALK_ACCESS_NV2,
+		WALK_ACCESS_NONARCH,
 	} type;
 
 	u64	ia;
@@ -357,7 +359,7 @@ static inline void fail_s1_walk(struct s1_walk_result *wr, u8 fst, bool s1ptw)
 }
 
 int __kvm_translate_va(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
-		       struct s1_walk_result *wr, u64 va);
+		       struct s1_walk_result *wr, struct kvm_walk_access *access);
 int __kvm_find_s1_desc_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 va, u64 ipa,
 			     int *level);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
index 6930bc3bc86b..597e9cddfc7e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
@@ -466,12 +466,13 @@ static void compute_s1_permissions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				   struct s1_walk_result *wr);
 
 static int walk_s1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
-		   struct s1_walk_result *wr, u64 va)
+		   struct s1_walk_result *wr, struct kvm_walk_access *access)
 {
-	u64 va_top, va_bottom, baddr, desc, new_desc, ipa;
+	u64 va_top, va_bottom, baddr, desc, new_desc, ipa, va;
 	struct kvm_s2_trans s2_trans = {};
 	int level, stride, ret;
 
+	va = access->ia;
 	level = wi->sl;
 	stride = wi->pgshift - 3;
 	baddr = wi->baddr;
@@ -1340,6 +1341,7 @@ static void compute_s1_permissions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 static int handle_at_slow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 op, u64 vaddr, u64 *par)
 {
+	struct kvm_walk_access access = {};
 	struct s1_walk_result wr = {};
 	struct s1_walk_info wi = {};
 	bool perm_fail = false;
@@ -1357,9 +1359,21 @@ static int handle_at_slow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 op, u64 vaddr, u64 *par)
 	if (wr.level == S1_MMU_DISABLED)
 		goto compute_par;
 
+	access.type = WALK_ACCESS_AT;
+	access.ia = vaddr;
+	switch (op) {
+	case OP_AT_S1E1WP:
+	case OP_AT_S1E1W:
+	case OP_AT_S1E2W:
+	case OP_AT_S1E0W:
+		access.write = true;
+		break;
+	default:
+	}
+
 	idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
 
-	ret = walk_s1(vcpu, &wi, &wr, vaddr);
+	ret = walk_s1(vcpu, &wi, &wr, &access);
 
 	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, idx);
 
@@ -1683,11 +1697,11 @@ int __kvm_at_s12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 op, u64 vaddr)
  * set. The rest of the wi and wr should be 0-initialised.
  */
 int __kvm_translate_va(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
-		       struct s1_walk_result *wr, u64 va)
+		       struct s1_walk_result *wr, struct kvm_walk_access *access)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = setup_s1_walk(vcpu, wi, wr, va);
+	ret = setup_s1_walk(vcpu, wi, wr, access->ia);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -1697,7 +1711,7 @@ int __kvm_translate_va(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	return walk_s1(vcpu, wi, wr, va);
+	return walk_s1(vcpu, wi, wr, access);
 }
 
 struct desc_match {
@@ -1735,6 +1749,10 @@ int __kvm_find_s1_desc_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 va, u64 ipa, int *level)
 		.as_el0	= false,
 		.pan	= false,
 	};
+	struct kvm_walk_access access = {
+		.type	= WALK_ACCESS_NONARCH,
+		.ia	= va,
+	};
 	struct s1_walk_result wr = {};
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1754,7 +1772,7 @@ int __kvm_find_s1_desc_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 va, u64 ipa, int *level)
 	}
 
 	/* Walk the guest's PT, looking for a match along the way */
-	ret = walk_s1(vcpu, &wi, &wr, va);
+	ret = walk_s1(vcpu, &wi, &wr, &access);
 	switch (ret) {
 	case -EINTR:
 		/* We interrupted the walk on a match, return the level */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 4f13f37e560b..54228db30371 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -1425,6 +1425,7 @@ static u64 read_vncr_el2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 static int kvm_translate_vncr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_gmem)
 {
+	struct kvm_walk_access access = {};
 	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
 	bool write_fault, writable;
 	unsigned long mmu_seq;
@@ -1434,6 +1435,7 @@ static int kvm_translate_vncr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_gmem)
 	int ret;
 
 	vt = vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb;
+	write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we're about to walk the EL2 S1 PTs, we must invalidate the
@@ -1459,12 +1461,14 @@ static int kvm_translate_vncr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool *is_gmem)
 
 	va =  read_vncr_el2(vcpu);
 
-	ret = __kvm_translate_va(vcpu, &vt->wi, &vt->wr, va);
+	access.type = WALK_ACCESS_NV2;
+	access.ia = va;
+	access.write = write_fault;
+
+	ret = __kvm_translate_va(vcpu, &vt->wi, &vt->wr, &access);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu);
-
 	mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_invalidate_seq;
 	smp_rmb();
 
-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 16:50   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-08  7:35     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 15:49   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 16:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-29 10:38       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:35     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:39       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 10:16   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-01 17:33     ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02  6:50       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-06-26 15:31 ` [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-26 17:45     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:37       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 10:29     ` Leonardo Bras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623184201.1518871-11-oupton@kernel.org \
    --to=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=weilin.chang@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox