Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:54:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623185427.001CC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184201.1518871-14-oupton@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Hardware management of the dirty state (wi->hd) is incorrectly enabled for stage-1 even if hardware management of the access flag (wi->ha) is disabled.
- [Medium] The walk result's descriptor and dirty state are not updated after a successful hardware update, leading to spurious secondary faults.
--

commit bfdb5faf043bd9330372f7cd1a89affe2bb61b35
Author: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1

This commit updates the KVM ARM64 software page table walker to clear
the PTE_RDONLY bit in guest page tables when write access is permitted
and DBM (Dirty Bit Management) is enabled. This simulates hardware
management of the dirty state during stage-1 translation walks.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> index 0218176107b52..bfba31b270a95 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,10 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
>  	wi->ha &= (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
>  		  FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_HA, tcr) :
>  		  FIELD_GET(TCR_HA, tcr));
> +	wi->hd  = kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, DBM);
> +	wi->hd &= (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
> +		  FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_HD, tcr) :
> +		  FIELD_GET(TCR_HD, tcr));

[Severity: High]
Does this code incorrectly enable hardware management of the dirty state (wi->hd)
when hardware management of the access flag (wi->ha) is disabled?

The ARM Architecture Reference Manual (D8.2.7) states that if HA is 0, HD is
effectively 0 and no hardware updates are permitted.

If a guest enables TCR_ELx.HD but leaves TCR_ELx.HA disabled, wi->hd evaluates
to true while wi->ha is false in setup_s1_walk(). Upon a write fault,
handle_desc_update() would clear PTE_RDONLY but skip setting PTE_AF, causing KVM
to inject an Access Flag fault despite having already modified the guest page
table to clear PTE_RDONLY.

>  
>  	return 0;

[ ... ]

> @@ -467,6 +487,9 @@ static int handle_desc_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
>  	if (wi->ha)
>  		new |= PTE_AF;
>  
> +	if (should_set_dirty_state(wi, ws, wr, access))
> +		new &= ~PTE_RDONLY;
> +
>  	if (new == old)
>  		return 0;

[Severity: Medium]
Are we failing to update the walk result (wr) after a successful hardware update?

When handle_desc_update() successfully clears PTE_RDONLY, it updates the
descriptor in guest memory and ws->desc, but wr->desc and wr->dirty are not
updated to reflect this change for walk_s1().

If kvm_translate_vncr() subsequently uses the stale wr.dirty == false, it maps
the VNCR page as PAGE_KERNEL_RO. When the guest retries the write, it triggers
a permission fault, forcing a second translation walk which then sees the updated
descriptor and maps it RW. Does this omission cause spurious secondary page
faults?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623184201.1518871-1-oupton@kernel.org?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 16:50   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-08  7:35     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-26 15:49   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 16:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-29 10:38       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:35     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:39       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 10:16   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-01 17:33     ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02  6:50       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-06-26 15:31 ` [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-26 17:45     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:37       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 10:29     ` Leonardo Bras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623185427.001CC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox