Linux KVM/arm64 development list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 20:56:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623205652.DC4C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184201.1518871-18-oupton@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM incorrectly applies stage-1 Access Flag updates to table descriptors when hardware AF updates are globally disabled, causing spurious permission faults and bypassing nested stage-2 dirty tracking.
--

commit 3e7cbff07bcf9d864e2cd9a33c92f040a6496081
Author: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>

KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1

This commit implements access flag updates on table descriptors as required
by FEAT_HAFT. Note that unlike leaf descriptors, access flags on table
descriptors never generate a fault.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> @@ -416,6 +416,8 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
>  	wi->hd &= (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
>  		  FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_HD, tcr) :
>  		  FIELD_GET(TCR_HD, tcr));
> +	wi->haft  = kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, HAFT) &&
> +		    FIELD_GET(TCR2_EL1_HAFT, effective_tcr2(vcpu, wi->regime));

[Severity: High]
Should wi->haft initialization be gated by wi->ha?

Per the ARM ARM, TCR2_ELx.HAFT is IGNORED if TCR_ELx.HA is 0. Because
wi->haft is evaluated independently of wi->ha here, the guest could configure
TCR_ELx.HA = 0 but TCR2_ELx.HAFT = 1.

[ ... ]

> @@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ static bool should_set_access_flag(struct s1_walk_info *wi, struct s1_walk_step
>  	if (access->type == WALK_ACCESS_NONARCH)
>  		return false;
>  
> -	return wi->ha;
> +	return kvm_pte_table(ws->desc, ws->level) ? wi->haft : wi->ha;
>  }

If the guest configures TCR_ELx.HA = 0 and TCR2_ELx.HAFT = 1, this will
return true for table descriptors even when hardware AF updates are disabled,
leading to spurious descriptor writes.

This can cause KVM to trigger stage-2 permission faults if the stage-2
mapping is read-only.

Furthermore, if the stage-2 mapping relies on hardware dirty state management
(DBM), KVM's nested stage-2 walk in walk_s1() treats the access as a read
because wi->ha is false:

arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:walk_s1() {
	...
	struct kvm_walk_access s2_access = {
		.type	= WALK_ACCESS_S1PTW,
		.ia	= ws.desc_ipa,
		/*
		 * R_JCXVS, stage-2 dirty state can be updated
		 * for an S1PTW even if the stage-1 descriptor
		 * isn't updated.
		 */
		.write	= wi->ha,
	};
	...
}

This will silently bypass the nested hypervisor's stage-2 dirty tracking
while still modifying the guest memory in host memory.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623184201.1518871-1-oupton@kernel.org?part=17

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 16:50   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-08  7:35     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 15:49   ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 16:03     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-29 10:38       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:35     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:39       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 10:16   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-01 17:33     ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02  6:50       ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-06-26 15:31 ` [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-26 17:45     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:37       ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 10:29     ` Leonardo Bras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623205652.DC4C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox