From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 20:56:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623205652.DC4C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184201.1518871-18-oupton@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM incorrectly applies stage-1 Access Flag updates to table descriptors when hardware AF updates are globally disabled, causing spurious permission faults and bypassing nested stage-2 dirty tracking.
--
commit 3e7cbff07bcf9d864e2cd9a33c92f040a6496081
Author: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1
This commit implements access flag updates on table descriptors as required
by FEAT_HAFT. Note that unlike leaf descriptors, access flags on table
descriptors never generate a fault.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> @@ -416,6 +416,8 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
> wi->hd &= (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
> FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_HD, tcr) :
> FIELD_GET(TCR_HD, tcr));
> + wi->haft = kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, HAFT) &&
> + FIELD_GET(TCR2_EL1_HAFT, effective_tcr2(vcpu, wi->regime));
[Severity: High]
Should wi->haft initialization be gated by wi->ha?
Per the ARM ARM, TCR2_ELx.HAFT is IGNORED if TCR_ELx.HA is 0. Because
wi->haft is evaluated independently of wi->ha here, the guest could configure
TCR_ELx.HA = 0 but TCR2_ELx.HAFT = 1.
[ ... ]
> @@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ static bool should_set_access_flag(struct s1_walk_info *wi, struct s1_walk_step
> if (access->type == WALK_ACCESS_NONARCH)
> return false;
>
> - return wi->ha;
> + return kvm_pte_table(ws->desc, ws->level) ? wi->haft : wi->ha;
> }
If the guest configures TCR_ELx.HA = 0 and TCR2_ELx.HAFT = 1, this will
return true for table descriptors even when hardware AF updates are disabled,
leading to spurious descriptor writes.
This can cause KVM to trigger stage-2 permission faults if the stage-2
mapping is read-only.
Furthermore, if the stage-2 mapping relies on hardware dirty state management
(DBM), KVM's nested stage-2 walk in walk_s1() treats the access as a read
because wi->ha is false:
arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:walk_s1() {
...
struct kvm_walk_access s2_access = {
.type = WALK_ACCESS_S1PTW,
.ia = ws.desc_ipa,
/*
* R_JCXVS, stage-2 dirty state can be updated
* for an S1PTW even if the stage-1 descriptor
* isn't updated.
*/
.write = wi->ha,
};
...
}
This will silently bypass the nested hypervisor's stage-2 dirty tracking
while still modifying the guest memory in host memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623184201.1518871-1-oupton@kernel.org?part=17
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 16:50 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-08 7:35 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-26 15:49 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 16:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-29 10:38 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:35 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:39 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton
2026-07-01 10:16 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-07-01 17:33 ` Oliver Upton
2026-07-02 6:50 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-06-26 15:31 ` [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Leonardo Bras
2026-06-26 17:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-06-26 17:45 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-29 10:37 ` Leonardo Bras
2026-06-29 10:29 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623205652.DC4C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox