From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up cpuinfo init and cpufeature updates
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 15:53:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01fefdd7-f007-4ac8-93f0-5267dddae451@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907164024.17164-7-will@kernel.org>
在 2026/9/8 0:40, Will Deacon 写道:
> Populating the 'cpuinfo_arm64' structure during CPU bringup and
> subsequently checking/updating cpufeature structures is slightly
> convoluted and differs unnecessarily between the boot CPU and secondary
> CPUs.
>
> Rework the code so that cpuinfo_store_cpu() is used to populate the
> 'cpuinfo_arm64' structure for each CPU, with secondary CPUs then calling
> update_cpu_features() to update the global view of the available
> features. This allows us to internalise the 'boot_cpu_data' in
> cpufeature.c and paves the way for parallelising the ID register probing
> during bring-up of secondary CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h | 7 +++----
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 11 -----------
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> index 3c008821219c..733178520c45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> @@ -73,11 +73,10 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct cpuinfo_arm64, cpu_data);
>
> void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void);
> -void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void);
>
> -void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
> -void update_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
> - struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot);
> +void __init init_cpu_features(void);
init_cpu_features() now only used in cpufeature.c, we can remove this
declaration and make it static in cpufeature.c.
> +void update_cpu_features(int cpu);
> +
> bool gmid_el1_accessible(const struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
>
> #endif /* __ASM_CPU_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 32102c3912fa..33279a264145 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(system_cpucaps);
> static struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const __ro_after_init *cpucap_ptrs[ARM64_NCAPS];
>
> DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_cpucaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
> +static struct cpuinfo_arm64 boot_cpu_data;
>
> /*
> * arm64_use_ng_mappings must be placed in the .data section, otherwise it
> @@ -1205,11 +1206,19 @@ bool gmid_el1_accessible(const struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
> return mte >= ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_MTE2;
> }
>
> -void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
> +void __init init_cpu_features(void)
> {
Maybe rename to init_boot_cpu_features() ?
Otherwise LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, 0);
> +
> /* Before we start using the tables, make sure it is sorted */
> sort_ftr_regs();
>
> + /*
> + * We keep a copy of the boot CPU registers so that physical hotplug
> + * of CPU 0 can still be properly checked.
> + */
> + boot_cpu_data = *info;
> +
> init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0, info->reg_ctr);
> init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_DCZID_EL0, info->reg_dczid);
> init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_CNTFRQ_EL0, info->reg_cntfrq);
> @@ -1404,12 +1413,14 @@ static int update_32bit_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_32bit *info,
> * non-boot CPU. Also performs SANITY checks to make sure that there
> * aren't any insane variations from that of the boot CPU.
> */
> -void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
> - struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
> - struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot)
> +void update_cpu_features(int cpu)
> {
> + struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot, *info;
> int taint = 0;
>
> + boot = &boot_cpu_data;
> + info = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_data, cpu);
> +
> /*
> * The kernel can handle differing I-cache policies, but otherwise
> * caches should look identical. Userspace JITs will make use of
> @@ -3978,6 +3989,8 @@ static void __init setup_boot_cpu_capabilities(void)
>
> void __init setup_boot_cpu_features(void)
> {
> + init_cpu_features();
> +
> /*
> * Initialize the indirect array of CPU capabilities pointers before we
> * handle the boot CPU.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> index 45c63f3d75c5..b423301a13cc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
> * values depending on configuration at or after reset.
> */
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuinfo_arm64, cpu_data);
> -static struct cpuinfo_arm64 boot_cpu_data;
>
> static inline const char *icache_policy_str(int l1ip)
> {
> @@ -531,14 +530,4 @@ void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_data);
> __cpuinfo_store_cpu(info);
> - update_cpu_features(smp_processor_id(), info, &boot_cpu_data);
> -}
> -
> -void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void)
> -{
> - struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, 0);
> - __cpuinfo_store_cpu(info);
> -
> - boot_cpu_data = *info;
> - init_cpu_features(&boot_cpu_data);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index ff045080ca1b..f4cabf9e19e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ asmlinkage notrace void secondary_start_kernel(void)
> * Log the CPU info before it is marked online and might get read.
> */
> cpuinfo_store_cpu();
> + update_cpu_features(cpu);
> store_cpu_topology(cpu);
>
> /*
> @@ -455,7 +456,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
> */
> set_my_cpu_offset(per_cpu_offset(smp_processor_id()));
>
> - cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu();
> + cpuinfo_store_cpu();
> setup_boot_cpu_features();
>
> /* Conditionally switch to GIC PMR for interrupt masking */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 16:40 [PATCH 00/19] arm64: Implement parallel CPU onlining with PSCI v0.2+ Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 01/19] cpu/hotplug: Clean up cmpxchg() logic in cpuhp_can_boot_ap() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 2:55 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 02/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid trying to bring up CPUs that are already online Will Deacon
2026-09-08 3:13 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 03/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid busy-polling on archs where cpu_relax() is a no-op Will Deacon
2026-09-08 4:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 7:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:57 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 04/19] cpu/hotplug: Propagate bring-up status to arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 4:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 05/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up smp_prepare_cpus() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 7:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 06/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up cpuinfo init and cpufeature updates Will Deacon
2026-09-08 7:53 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 07/19] arm64: smp: Defer update of secondary CPU capabilities Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:20 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 08/19] arm64: smp: Don't bother printing the I-cache policy for each CPU Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:33 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 09/19] arm64: smp: Defer RCU registration during secondary CPU bringup Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:55 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-08 10:19 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:25 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-09 12:36 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-10 2:47 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:52 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 10/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-09-08 9:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 11/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP " Will Deacon
2026-09-08 9:10 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-08 11:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:55 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 12/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Make 'cpu_operations' pointer global instead of per-cpu Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:32 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:55 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 13/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Introduce get_secondary_cpu_ops() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 14/19] firmware/psci: Cache PSCI v0.2+ version number to avoid redundant SMCs Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:57 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 15/19] firmware/psci: Extend ->cpu_on() callback to take an additional argument Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 16/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Expose optional argument to target cpu in ->cpu_boot() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:12 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 17/19] arm64: smp: Pass secondary CPU boot parameters via firmware if possible Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 18/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_PARALLEL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 19/19] arm64: smp: Harden parallel CPU bringup against broken PSCI firmware Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:36 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01fefdd7-f007-4ac8-93f0-5267dddae451@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox