Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up cpuinfo init and cpufeature updates
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 15:53:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01fefdd7-f007-4ac8-93f0-5267dddae451@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907164024.17164-7-will@kernel.org>



在 2026/9/8 0:40, Will Deacon 写道:
> Populating the 'cpuinfo_arm64' structure during CPU bringup and
> subsequently checking/updating cpufeature structures is slightly
> convoluted and differs unnecessarily between the boot CPU and secondary
> CPUs.
> 
> Rework the code so that cpuinfo_store_cpu() is used to populate the
> 'cpuinfo_arm64' structure for each CPU, with secondary CPUs then calling
> update_cpu_features() to update the global view of the available
> features. This allows us to internalise the 'boot_cpu_data' in
> cpufeature.c and paves the way for parallelising the ID register probing
> during bring-up of secondary CPUs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h   |  7 +++----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c    | 11 -----------
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c        |  3 ++-
>  4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> index 3c008821219c..733178520c45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h
> @@ -73,11 +73,10 @@ struct cpuinfo_arm64 {
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct cpuinfo_arm64, cpu_data);
>  
>  void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void);
> -void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void);
>  
> -void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
> -void update_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
> -				 struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot);
> +void __init init_cpu_features(void);

init_cpu_features() now only used in cpufeature.c, we can remove this
declaration and make it static in cpufeature.c.

> +void update_cpu_features(int cpu);
> +
>  bool gmid_el1_accessible(const struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info);
>  
>  #endif /* __ASM_CPU_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 32102c3912fa..33279a264145 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(system_cpucaps);
>  static struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const __ro_after_init *cpucap_ptrs[ARM64_NCAPS];
>  
>  DECLARE_BITMAP(boot_cpucaps, ARM64_NCAPS);
> +static struct cpuinfo_arm64 boot_cpu_data;
>  
>  /*
>   * arm64_use_ng_mappings must be placed in the .data section, otherwise it
> @@ -1205,11 +1206,19 @@ bool gmid_el1_accessible(const struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
>  	return mte >= ID_AA64PFR1_EL1_MTE_MTE2;
>  }
>  
> -void __init init_cpu_features(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
> +void __init init_cpu_features(void)
>  {

Maybe rename to init_boot_cpu_features() ?


Otherwise LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

> +	struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, 0);
> +
>  	/* Before we start using the tables, make sure it is sorted */
>  	sort_ftr_regs();
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * We keep a copy of the boot CPU registers so that physical hotplug
> +	 * of CPU 0 can still be properly checked.
> +	 */
> +	boot_cpu_data = *info;
> +
>  	init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_CTR_EL0, info->reg_ctr);
>  	init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_DCZID_EL0, info->reg_dczid);
>  	init_cpu_ftr_reg(SYS_CNTFRQ_EL0, info->reg_cntfrq);
> @@ -1404,12 +1413,14 @@ static int update_32bit_cpu_features(int cpu, struct cpuinfo_32bit *info,
>   * non-boot CPU. Also performs SANITY checks to make sure that there
>   * aren't any insane variations from that of the boot CPU.
>   */
> -void update_cpu_features(int cpu,
> -			 struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info,
> -			 struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot)
> +void update_cpu_features(int cpu)
>  {
> +	struct cpuinfo_arm64 *boot, *info;
>  	int taint = 0;
>  
> +	boot = &boot_cpu_data;
> +	info = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_data, cpu);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * The kernel can handle differing I-cache policies, but otherwise
>  	 * caches should look identical. Userspace JITs will make use of
> @@ -3978,6 +3989,8 @@ static void __init setup_boot_cpu_capabilities(void)
>  
>  void __init setup_boot_cpu_features(void)
>  {
> +	init_cpu_features();
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Initialize the indirect array of CPU capabilities pointers before we
>  	 * handle the boot CPU.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> index 45c63f3d75c5..b423301a13cc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
>   * values depending on configuration at or after reset.
>   */
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuinfo_arm64, cpu_data);
> -static struct cpuinfo_arm64 boot_cpu_data;
>  
>  static inline const char *icache_policy_str(int l1ip)
>  {
> @@ -531,14 +530,4 @@ void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void)
>  {
>  	struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_data);
>  	__cpuinfo_store_cpu(info);
> -	update_cpu_features(smp_processor_id(), info, &boot_cpu_data);
> -}
> -
> -void __init cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu(void)
> -{
> -	struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, 0);
> -	__cpuinfo_store_cpu(info);
> -
> -	boot_cpu_data = *info;
> -	init_cpu_features(&boot_cpu_data);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index ff045080ca1b..f4cabf9e19e6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ asmlinkage notrace void secondary_start_kernel(void)
>  	 * Log the CPU info before it is marked online and might get read.
>  	 */
>  	cpuinfo_store_cpu();
> +	update_cpu_features(cpu);
>  	store_cpu_topology(cpu);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -455,7 +456,7 @@ void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
>  	 */
>  	set_my_cpu_offset(per_cpu_offset(smp_processor_id()));
>  
> -	cpuinfo_store_boot_cpu();
> +	cpuinfo_store_cpu();
>  	setup_boot_cpu_features();
>  
>  	/* Conditionally switch to GIC PMR for interrupt masking */



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-08  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07 16:40 [PATCH 00/19] arm64: Implement parallel CPU onlining with PSCI v0.2+ Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 01/19] cpu/hotplug: Clean up cmpxchg() logic in cpuhp_can_boot_ap() Will Deacon
2026-09-08  2:55   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 02/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid trying to bring up CPUs that are already online Will Deacon
2026-09-08  3:13   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 03/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid busy-polling on archs where cpu_relax() is a no-op Will Deacon
2026-09-08  4:00   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11  7:16   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:57     ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 04/19] cpu/hotplug: Propagate bring-up status to arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu() Will Deacon
2026-09-08  4:05   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 05/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up smp_prepare_cpus() Will Deacon
2026-09-08  7:35   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 06/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up cpuinfo init and cpufeature updates Will Deacon
2026-09-08  7:53   ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 07/19] arm64: smp: Defer update of secondary CPU capabilities Will Deacon
2026-09-08  8:20   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 08/19] arm64: smp: Don't bother printing the I-cache policy for each CPU Will Deacon
2026-09-08  8:33   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 09/19] arm64: smp: Defer RCU registration during secondary CPU bringup Will Deacon
2026-09-08  8:55   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-08 10:19     ` Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:25       ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-09 12:36         ` Will Deacon
2026-09-10  2:47           ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:52             ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 10/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-09-08  9:01   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 11/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP " Will Deacon
2026-09-08  9:10   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-08 11:35   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:55     ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 12/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Make 'cpu_operations' pointer global instead of per-cpu Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:32   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:55     ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 13/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Introduce get_secondary_cpu_ops() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:56   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 14/19] firmware/psci: Cache PSCI v0.2+ version number to avoid redundant SMCs Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:57   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 15/19] firmware/psci: Extend ->cpu_on() callback to take an additional argument Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:05   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 16/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Expose optional argument to target cpu in ->cpu_boot() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:12   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 17/19] arm64: smp: Pass secondary CPU boot parameters via firmware if possible Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:16   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 18/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_PARALLEL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:05   ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:56     ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 19/19] arm64: smp: Harden parallel CPU bringup against broken PSCI firmware Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:36   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01fefdd7-f007-4ac8-93f0-5267dddae451@huawei.com \
    --to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox