From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/19] arm64: smp: Defer RCU registration during secondary CPU bringup
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 16:55:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45c37592-f05d-4b1c-812b-0cb38d1c3e24@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907164024.17164-10-will@kernel.org>
在 2026/9/8 0:40, Will Deacon 写道:
> Calling rcutree_report_cpu_starting() early during boot can lead to
> livelocks with the generic CPU hotplug mechanism if the boot CPU blocks
> on an RCU grace period while the CPU being onlined is spinning in
> cpuhp_ap_sync_alive().
>
> In preparation for enabling the generic CPU hotplug code on arm64, split
> up the trace_hardirqs_off() call during secondary CPU bringup so that we
> update lockdep early but defer the tracing updates until after
> notify_cpu_starting() has registered the new CPU with RCU, allowing us
> to drop the explicit call to rcutree_report_cpu_starting() entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 5 ++---
> include/linux/rcutree.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index f4cabf9e19e6..ff68640d0c0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -217,8 +217,7 @@ asmlinkage notrace void secondary_start_kernel(void)
> if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
> init_gic_priority_masking();
>
> - rcutree_report_cpu_starting(cpu);
> - trace_hardirqs_off();
Hi Will,
I think we need to handle the printk problem before this patch as we
discussed earlier.
Otherwise defer the rcutree_report_cpu_starting() will trigger a
false-positive lockdep"suspicious RCU usage" splat during early lock
acquisitions as commit ce3d31ad3cac ("arm64/smp: Move
rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") pointed out.
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/483e471d-d51b-4991-98d8-c0b4a2cdf8d8@huawei.com/
Best regards,
Jinjie
> + lockdep_hardirqs_off(CALLER_ADDR0);
>
> /*
> * If the system has established the capabilities, make sure
> @@ -242,6 +241,7 @@ asmlinkage notrace void secondary_start_kernel(void)
> * Enable GIC and timers.
> */
> notify_cpu_starting(cpu);
> + trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
>
> ipi_setup(cpu);
>
> @@ -411,7 +411,6 @@ void __noreturn cpu_die_early(void)
>
> /* Mark this CPU absent */
> set_cpu_present(cpu, 0);
> - rcutree_report_cpu_dead();
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)) {
> update_cpu_boot_status(CPU_KILL_ME);
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
> index 16a04202888b..e6ad4f2a475c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>
> void rcutree_migrate_callbacks(int cpu);
>
> -/* Called from hotplug and also arm64 early secondary boot failure */
> +/* Called from hotplug */
> void rcutree_report_cpu_dead(void);
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_RCUTREE_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 16:40 [PATCH 00/19] arm64: Implement parallel CPU onlining with PSCI v0.2+ Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 01/19] cpu/hotplug: Clean up cmpxchg() logic in cpuhp_can_boot_ap() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 2:55 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 02/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid trying to bring up CPUs that are already online Will Deacon
2026-09-08 3:13 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 03/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid busy-polling on archs where cpu_relax() is a no-op Will Deacon
2026-09-08 4:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 7:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:57 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 04/19] cpu/hotplug: Propagate bring-up status to arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 4:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 05/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up smp_prepare_cpus() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 7:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 06/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up cpuinfo init and cpufeature updates Will Deacon
2026-09-08 7:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 07/19] arm64: smp: Defer update of secondary CPU capabilities Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:20 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 08/19] arm64: smp: Don't bother printing the I-cache policy for each CPU Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:33 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 09/19] arm64: smp: Defer RCU registration during secondary CPU bringup Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:55 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-09-08 10:19 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:25 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-09 12:36 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-10 2:47 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:52 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 10/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-09-08 9:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 11/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP " Will Deacon
2026-09-08 9:10 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-08 11:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:55 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 12/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Make 'cpu_operations' pointer global instead of per-cpu Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:32 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:55 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 13/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Introduce get_secondary_cpu_ops() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 14/19] firmware/psci: Cache PSCI v0.2+ version number to avoid redundant SMCs Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:57 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 15/19] firmware/psci: Extend ->cpu_on() callback to take an additional argument Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 16/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Expose optional argument to target cpu in ->cpu_boot() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:12 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 17/19] arm64: smp: Pass secondary CPU boot parameters via firmware if possible Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 18/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_PARALLEL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 19/19] arm64: smp: Harden parallel CPU bringup against broken PSCI firmware Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:36 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45c37592-f05d-4b1c-812b-0cb38d1c3e24@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox