From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid busy-polling on archs where cpu_relax() is a no-op
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:00:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90935a12-a728-4c73-a538-06752b783210@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907164024.17164-4-will@kernel.org>
在 2026/9/8 0:40, Will Deacon 写道:
> On some architectures (such as arm64), cpu_relax() is effectively a NOP
> and so isn't particularly efficient when used in a tight polling loop
Yes, a "yield" instruction in aarch64 is essentially a nop, with no
power optimization effect.
However, x86 "PAUSE" provides power optimization benefits.
> such as the CPU state synchronisation in cpuhp_wait_for_sync_state().
>
> Once an incoming CPU has reached the SYNC_STATE_ALIVE state, we know
> that it is executing within the kernel and so we can use the more
> efficient polling mechanism provided by the atomic_cond_read* API.
Right! Once the secondary CPU state transitions to SYNC_STATE_ALIVE, it
is already executing kernel C code.
>
> Extend the generic implementation of arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll() to
> take the state details as additional parameters and polling using
> atomic_cond_read_relaxed() instead of cpu_relax() once we have reached
> the alive state. No change on x86.
Right! x86 still use cpu_relax() for atomic_cond_read_relaxed().
And we can aslo mention that this also allow RISC-V to leverage the
Zawrs extension for low-power stalling instead of busy-wasting cycles
with cpu_relax().
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 2 +-
> kernel/cpu.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index ba01a9e919b7..362f85cbdbaf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ void arch_cpuhp_cleanup_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> pr_info("CPU %u is now offline\n", cpu);
> }
>
> -void arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll(void)
> +void arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll(atomic_t *st, int old)
> {
> if (smp_ops.poll_sync_state)
> smp_ops.poll_sync_state();
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> index feb32949aeea..bbcee650155f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static inline void cpuhp_online_idle(enum cpuhp_state state) { }
> struct task_struct;
>
> void cpuhp_ap_sync_alive(void);
> -void arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll(void);
> +void arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll(atomic_t *st, int old);
> void arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> int arch_cpuhp_kick_ap_alive(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle);
> bool arch_cpuhp_init_parallel_bringup(void);
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 97a9bfe4edad..d9fe204f02cb 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -303,7 +303,13 @@ static inline void cpuhp_ap_update_sync_state(enum cpuhp_sync_state state)
> (void)atomic_xchg(st, state);
> }
>
> -void __weak arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll(void) { cpu_relax(); }
> +void __weak arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll(atomic_t *st, int old)
> +{
> + if (old < SYNC_STATE_ALIVE)
> + cpu_relax();
> + else
> + atomic_cond_read_relaxed(st, VAL != old);
> +}
With atomic_cond_read_relaxed(), we can use WFE to improve the power for
arm64.
>
> static bool cpuhp_wait_for_sync_state(unsigned int cpu, enum cpuhp_sync_state state,
> enum cpuhp_sync_state next_state)
> @@ -328,7 +334,7 @@ static bool cpuhp_wait_for_sync_state(unsigned int cpu, enum cpuhp_sync_state st
> return false;
> } else if (now - start < NSEC_PER_MSEC) {
> /* Poll for one millisecond */
> - arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll();
> + arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll(st, sync);
> } else {
> usleep_range(USEC_PER_MSEC, 2 * USEC_PER_MSEC);
> }
> @@ -395,8 +401,7 @@ void cpuhp_ap_sync_alive(void)
> cpuhp_ap_update_sync_state(SYNC_STATE_ALIVE);
>
> /* Wait for the control CPU to release it. */
> - while (atomic_read(st) != SYNC_STATE_SHOULD_ONLINE)
> - cpu_relax();
> + atomic_cond_read_acquire(st, VAL == SYNC_STATE_SHOULD_ONLINE);
LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> }
>
> static bool cpuhp_can_boot_ap(unsigned int cpu)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 16:40 [PATCH 00/19] arm64: Implement parallel CPU onlining with PSCI v0.2+ Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 01/19] cpu/hotplug: Clean up cmpxchg() logic in cpuhp_can_boot_ap() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 2:55 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 02/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid trying to bring up CPUs that are already online Will Deacon
2026-09-08 3:13 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 03/19] cpu/hotplug: Avoid busy-polling on archs where cpu_relax() is a no-op Will Deacon
2026-09-08 4:00 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-09-11 7:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:57 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 04/19] cpu/hotplug: Propagate bring-up status to arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 4:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 05/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up smp_prepare_cpus() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 7:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 06/19] arm64: smp: Tidy up cpuinfo init and cpufeature updates Will Deacon
2026-09-08 7:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 07/19] arm64: smp: Defer update of secondary CPU capabilities Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:20 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 08/19] arm64: smp: Don't bother printing the I-cache policy for each CPU Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:33 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 09/19] arm64: smp: Defer RCU registration during secondary CPU bringup Will Deacon
2026-09-08 8:55 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-08 10:19 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:25 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-09 12:36 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-10 2:47 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:52 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 10/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-09-08 9:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 11/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP " Will Deacon
2026-09-08 9:10 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-08 11:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:55 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 12/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Make 'cpu_operations' pointer global instead of per-cpu Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:32 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:55 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 13/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Introduce get_secondary_cpu_ops() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 14/19] firmware/psci: Cache PSCI v0.2+ version number to avoid redundant SMCs Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:57 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 15/19] firmware/psci: Extend ->cpu_on() callback to take an additional argument Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 16/19] arm64: cpu_ops: Expose optional argument to target cpu in ->cpu_boot() Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:12 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 17/19] arm64: smp: Pass secondary CPU boot parameters via firmware if possible Will Deacon
2026-09-08 12:16 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 18/19] arm64: smp: Use generic HOTPLUG_PARALLEL machinery for CPU onlining Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:05 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-11 12:56 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:40 ` [PATCH 19/19] arm64: smp: Harden parallel CPU bringup against broken PSCI firmware Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:36 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90935a12-a728-4c73-a538-06752b783210@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox