* [PATCH] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro
@ 2021-03-25 14:13 Linus Walleij
2021-03-25 14:34 ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-26 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2021-03-25 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland
The spec_bar() macro was introduced in
commit bd4fb6d270bc ("arm64: Add support for SB barrier and patch in over DSB; ISB sequences")
as a way for C to insert a speculation barrier and was then
used in one single place: set_fs().
Later on
commit 3d2403fd10a1 ("arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs()")
deleted set_fs() altogether and as noted in the commit
on the new path the regular sb() assembly macro will
be used.
Delete the remnant.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Fixes: 3d2403fd10a1 ("arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs()")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
index c3009b0e5239..bab29932d21b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -25,10 +25,6 @@
#define psb_csync() asm volatile("hint #17" : : : "memory")
#define csdb() asm volatile("hint #20" : : : "memory")
-#define spec_bar() asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("dsb nsh\nisb\n", \
- SB_BARRIER_INSN"nop\n", \
- ARM64_HAS_SB))
-
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
#define pmr_sync() \
do { \
--
2.29.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro
2021-03-25 14:13 [PATCH] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro Linus Walleij
@ 2021-03-25 14:34 ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-26 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2021-03-25 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij; +Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 03:13:04PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The spec_bar() macro was introduced in
> commit bd4fb6d270bc ("arm64: Add support for SB barrier and patch in over DSB; ISB sequences")
> as a way for C to insert a speculation barrier and was then
> used in one single place: set_fs().
>
> Later on
> commit 3d2403fd10a1 ("arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs()")
> deleted set_fs() altogether and as noted in the commit
> on the new path the regular sb() assembly macro will
> be used.
>
> Delete the remnant.
>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Fixes: 3d2403fd10a1 ("arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs()")
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
I think this is a cleanup rather than a fix, so we don't need the fixes
tag. I don't have a problem with this going, so with the fixes tag
removed:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mark.
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> index c3009b0e5239..bab29932d21b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -25,10 +25,6 @@
> #define psb_csync() asm volatile("hint #17" : : : "memory")
> #define csdb() asm volatile("hint #20" : : : "memory")
>
> -#define spec_bar() asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("dsb nsh\nisb\n", \
> - SB_BARRIER_INSN"nop\n", \
> - ARM64_HAS_SB))
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
> #define pmr_sync() \
> do { \
> --
> 2.29.2
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro
2021-03-25 14:13 [PATCH] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro Linus Walleij
2021-03-25 14:34 ` Mark Rutland
@ 2021-03-26 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2021-03-26 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Deacon, Linus Walleij; +Cc: Mark Rutland, linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:13:04 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The spec_bar() macro was introduced in
> commit bd4fb6d270bc ("arm64: Add support for SB barrier and patch in over DSB; ISB sequences")
> as a way for C to insert a speculation barrier and was then
> used in one single place: set_fs().
>
> Later on
> commit 3d2403fd10a1 ("arm64: uaccess: remove set_fs()")
> deleted set_fs() altogether and as noted in the commit
> on the new path the regular sb() assembly macro will
> be used.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/4f30ba1cce36
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-26 11:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-25 14:13 [PATCH] arm64: barrier: Remove spec_bar() macro Linus Walleij
2021-03-25 14:34 ` Mark Rutland
2021-03-26 11:06 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox