From: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Newton Liu <newtonl@nvidia.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/23] resctrl: name node-scoped monitor domains mon_NODE_<id>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:03:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716210329.2914625-11-fenghuay@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1784217438.git.fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Monitor domain directories under mon_data are named mon_<name>_<id>,
using the resource name as the label. For memory bandwidth monitoring on
a memory-side MSC the domain id is a NUMA node id, so labelling those
directories with the resource name ("MB") is misleading about what the
id means.
Add the RESCTRL_NODE monitor scope and a mon_domain_name() helper that
returns "NODE" for node-scoped resources (and the resource name for all
other scopes), then use it when building and removing monitor domain
directories. Node-scoped monitor domains are now named mon_NODE_<id>,
making it clear the id is a NUMA node id. L3 and telemetry naming
(mon_L3_<id>, mon_PERF_PKG_<id>) is unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
---
fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
include/linux/resctrl.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index 0bdcf6dd935c..db0255951f0e 100644
--- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -3947,6 +3947,20 @@ static void mon_rmdir_one_subdir(struct kernfs_node *pkn, char *name, char *subn
kernfs_remove_by_name(kn, subname);
}
+/*
+ * Label used in the mon_<label>_<id> monitor domain directory names. Node
+ * scoped monitoring (for example MB on a memory MSC) uses "NODE" so the id
+ * is understood as a NUMA node id; other scopes keep the resource name
+ * (L3 -> "L3", telemetry -> "PERF_PKG").
+ */
+static const char *mon_domain_name(struct rdt_resource *r)
+{
+ if (r->mon_scope == RESCTRL_NODE)
+ return "NODE";
+
+ return r->name;
+}
+
/*
* Remove files and directories for one SNC node. If it is the last node
* sharing an L3 cache, then remove the upper level directory containing
@@ -3990,7 +4004,7 @@ static void rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp(struct rdt_resource *r,
return;
}
- sprintf(name, "mon_%s_%02d", r->name, hdr->id);
+ sprintf(name, "mon_%s_%02d", mon_domain_name(r), hdr->id);
list_for_each_entry(prgrp, &rdt_all_groups, rdtgroup_list) {
kernfs_remove_by_name(prgrp->mon.mon_data_kn, name);
@@ -4094,7 +4108,7 @@ static int mkdir_mondata_subdir(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_L3 && r->mon_scope == RESCTRL_L3_NODE)
return mkdir_mondata_subdir_snc(parent_kn, hdr, r, prgrp);
- sprintf(name, "mon_%s_%02d", r->name, hdr->id);
+ sprintf(name, "mon_%s_%02d", mon_domain_name(r), hdr->id);
kn = _mkdir_mondata_subdir(parent_kn, name, hdr, r, prgrp, hdr->id);
if (IS_ERR(kn))
return PTR_ERR(kn);
@@ -4149,8 +4163,11 @@ static int mkdir_mondata_subdir_alldom(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
* This creates a directory mon_data which contains the monitored data.
*
* mon_data has one directory for each domain which are named
- * in the format mon_<domain_name>_<domain_id>. For ex: A mon_data
- * with L3 domain looks as below:
+ * in the format mon_<domain_name>_<domain_id>. The domain name is the
+ * resource name for cache and telemetry scopes (for example "L3") and
+ * "NODE" for node scoped monitoring (for example MB on a memory MSC,
+ * where <domain_id> is a NUMA node id). For ex: A mon_data with L3 domain
+ * looks as below:
* ./mon_data:
* mon_L3_00
* mon_L3_01
diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
index cfb4c17bcb53..307803ea1b09 100644
--- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
+++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
@@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ enum resctrl_scope {
RESCTRL_L3_CACHE = 3,
RESCTRL_L3_NODE,
RESCTRL_PACKAGE,
+ RESCTRL_NODE,
};
/**
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 21:02 [PATCH RFC 00/23] resctrl: MBA control emulation and ARM MPAM MB_NODE support Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 01/23] resctrl: Fix ownership of resource_schemata control subdirectories Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 02/23] arm_mpam: Fix NULL address access issue Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 03/23] resctrl: Expose MBA resource_schemata mode sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 04/23] resctrl: Expose per-control status in resource_schemata Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 05/23] resctrl: Add nested resource_schemata support for emulated controls Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 06/23] resctrl: Mirror schemata for controls without MBW hardware Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 07/23] resctrl: Rebuild resource_schemata subdirs on MBA mode change Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 08/23] Documentation: resctrl: document MBA control emulation Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 09/23] resctrl: De-hardcode L3 monitor infrastructure Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 10/23] resctrl: Expose MBA MBM counter assignment sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 12/23] resctrl: Add node-scope MBM total event Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 13/23] resctrl: Make MBM paths resource-aware Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 14/23] arm_mpam: Support memory-level MSCs and ABMC per class Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 15/23] arm_mpam: Refine L3 topology and class selection Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 16/23] arm_mpam: Include all MSC components during domain setup Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 17/23] arm_mpam: Handle CPU-less numa nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 18/23] arm_mpam: Emulate MB control with node-scoped MB_NODE control Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 19/23] Documentation: arm64: mpam: document memory-level MB control and NUMA nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 20/23] Documentation: resctrl: document NODE-scoped MBA domains and mon_NODE monitoring Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 21/23] Documentation: resctrl: document MB_NODE emulation example on ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 22/23] arm_mpam: Add KUnit test for CPU-less NUMA node affinity Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 23/23] selftests/resctrl: Add MB emulation test for ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716210329.2914625-11-fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--to=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=fustini@kernel.org \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox