From: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Newton Liu <newtonl@nvidia.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 15/23] arm_mpam: Refine L3 topology and class selection
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:03:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716210329.2914625-15-fenghuay@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1784217438.git.fenghuay@nvidia.com>
After enabling memory-level MSCs, the existing class-picking heuristics
still treat every candidate like an L3 cache MSC. That rejects valid
memory classes for MBWU counters and applies L3 egress checks to MBA
classes on CPU-less or system-wide affinities, leaving no monitor or
control class selected on affected platforms.
Adjust the heuristics so memory classes can back MBWU directly, L3
topology matching is only required for level-3 MBA candidates, and
traffic matching is skipped when the class already spans all CPUs.
Also tolerate components with no online CPUs once at least one
component has matched.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
index 953412f11995..86458a56a526 100644
--- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
@@ -854,10 +854,12 @@ static bool topology_matches_l3(struct mpam_class *victim)
{
int cpu, err;
struct mpam_component *victim_iter;
+ bool matched_once = false;
lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
cpumask_var_t __free(free_cpumask_var) tmp_cpumask = CPUMASK_VAR_NULL;
+
if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&tmp_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
return false;
@@ -871,8 +873,11 @@ static bool topology_matches_l3(struct mpam_class *victim)
}
cpu = cpumask_any_and(&victim_iter->affinity, cpu_online_mask);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)) {
+ if (matched_once)
+ continue;
return false;
+ }
cpumask_clear(tmp_cpumask);
err = find_l3_equivalent_bitmask(cpu, tmp_cpumask);
@@ -892,6 +897,7 @@ static bool topology_matches_l3(struct mpam_class *victim)
return false;
}
+ matched_once = true;
}
return true;
@@ -1030,13 +1036,15 @@ static void mpam_resctrl_pick_mba(void)
continue;
}
- if (!topology_matches_l3(class)) {
+ if (class->level == 3 && !topology_matches_l3(class)) {
pr_debug("class %u topology doesn't match L3\n",
class->level);
continue;
}
- if (!traffic_matches_l3(class)) {
+ /* Check memory at egress from L3 for MSC with L3 */
+ if (!cpumask_equal(&class->affinity, cpu_possible_mask) &&
+ !traffic_matches_l3(class)) {
pr_debug("class %u traffic doesn't match L3 egress\n",
class->level);
continue;
@@ -1164,8 +1172,9 @@ static void mpam_resctrl_pick_counters(void)
}
if (class_has_usable_mbwu(class) &&
- topology_matches_l3(class) &&
- traffic_matches_l3(class)) {
+ ((class->type == MPAM_CLASS_MEMORY) ||
+ (topology_matches_l3(class) &&
+ traffic_matches_l3(class)))) {
pr_debug("class %u has usable MBWU, and matches L3 topology and traffic\n",
class->level);
@@ -1302,6 +1311,9 @@ static int mpam_resctrl_pick_domain_id(int cpu, struct mpam_component *comp)
if (class->type == MPAM_CLASS_CACHE)
return comp->comp_id;
+ if (mpam_class_memory(class))
+ return comp->comp_id;
+
if (topology_matches_l3(class)) {
/* Use the corresponding L3 component ID as the domain ID */
int id = get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(cpu, 3);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 21:02 [PATCH RFC 00/23] resctrl: MBA control emulation and ARM MPAM MB_NODE support Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 01/23] resctrl: Fix ownership of resource_schemata control subdirectories Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 02/23] arm_mpam: Fix NULL address access issue Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 03/23] resctrl: Expose MBA resource_schemata mode sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 04/23] resctrl: Expose per-control status in resource_schemata Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 05/23] resctrl: Add nested resource_schemata support for emulated controls Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 06/23] resctrl: Mirror schemata for controls without MBW hardware Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 07/23] resctrl: Rebuild resource_schemata subdirs on MBA mode change Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 08/23] Documentation: resctrl: document MBA control emulation Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 09/23] resctrl: De-hardcode L3 monitor infrastructure Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 10/23] resctrl: Expose MBA MBM counter assignment sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 11/23] resctrl: name node-scoped monitor domains mon_NODE_<id> Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 12/23] resctrl: Add node-scope MBM total event Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 13/23] resctrl: Make MBM paths resource-aware Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 14/23] arm_mpam: Support memory-level MSCs and ABMC per class Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 16/23] arm_mpam: Include all MSC components during domain setup Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 17/23] arm_mpam: Handle CPU-less numa nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 18/23] arm_mpam: Emulate MB control with node-scoped MB_NODE control Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 19/23] Documentation: arm64: mpam: document memory-level MB control and NUMA nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 20/23] Documentation: resctrl: document NODE-scoped MBA domains and mon_NODE monitoring Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 21/23] Documentation: resctrl: document MB_NODE emulation example on ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 22/23] arm_mpam: Add KUnit test for CPU-less NUMA node affinity Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 23/23] selftests/resctrl: Add MB emulation test for ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716210329.2914625-15-fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--to=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=fustini@kernel.org \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox