Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Drew Fustini <fustini@kernel.org>,
	Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	Newton Liu <newtonl@nvidia.com>, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/23] resctrl: Add nested resource_schemata support for emulated controls
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:02:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716210329.2914625-5-fenghuay@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1784217438.git.fenghuay@nvidia.com>

Some architectures expose an alternate, hardware-native control that
emulates a legacy control (for example a node-scoped bandwidth control
emulating the L3-shaped MB control). Represent this relationship with a
new resctrl_ctrl::emulated_by pointer stored on the emulated (default)
control, pointing at the control that emulates it, and add a
RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_NODE control name for the node-scoped variant.

Build the resource_schemata tree accordingly: create the default control
directory first, then nest each emulating control beneath the default
control it emulates, while non-emulated controls remain directly under
resource_schemata. Creating the default directory up front makes the
layout independent of the order controls appear in the list.

Architecture backends set emulated_by during control init; until then the
nesting branch is never taken and all controls remain directly under
resource_schemata.

Factor the per-control directory creation into
resctrl_ctrl_create_subdir() and fix its error and ownership handling so
the newly created directory (not its parent) is validated and gets its
uid/gid applied.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c |  2 +
 fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c           |  1 +
 fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c              | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 include/linux/resctrl.h            |  7 +++-
 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
index 07c6ebb7fc43..5575a16caeab 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
@@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ static __init bool __temporary_multiple_mba_intel_controls(struct rdt_resource *
 	case RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_MAX:
 		hw_ctrl->msr_update = update_temporary_max;
 		break;
+	default:
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return true;
diff --git a/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
index d95ab8ad36e2..1f832a838115 100644
--- a/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
+++ b/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
@@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ static const char * const resctrl_ctrl_name[] = {
 	[RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_DEF]		= "",
 	[RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_MIN]		= "MIN",
 	[RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_MAX]		= "MAX",
+	[RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_NODE]	= "NODE",
 };
 
 const char *resctrl_ctrl_name_str(enum resctrl_ctrl_name name)
diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index a3aad9b1ff6e..3bec23728847 100644
--- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -2781,6 +2781,26 @@ static int resctrl_ctrl_add_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int resctrl_ctrl_create_subdir(struct kernfs_node *kn_dir,
+				      struct rdt_resource_final *f,
+				      struct resctrl_ctrl *ctrl, struct kernfs_node **kn_ctrl)
+{
+	char ctrl_full_name[20];
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = snprintf(ctrl_full_name, sizeof(ctrl_full_name), "%s%s%s",
+		       f->name, resctrl_ctrl_is_default(ctrl) ? "" : "_",
+		       resctrl_ctrl_is_default(ctrl) ? "" : resctrl_ctrl_name_str(ctrl->name));
+	if (ret >= sizeof(ctrl_full_name))
+		return -ENOSPC;
+
+	*kn_ctrl = kernfs_create_dir(kn_dir, ctrl_full_name, kn_dir->mode, ctrl);
+	if (IS_ERR(*kn_ctrl))
+		return PTR_ERR(*kn_ctrl);
+
+	return rdtgroup_kn_set_ugid(*kn_ctrl);
+}
+
 /*
  * No need to cleanup on exit - caller calls the recursive kernfs_remove()
  * on failure.
@@ -2788,10 +2808,9 @@ static int resctrl_ctrl_add_files(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 static int resctrl_mkdir_schemata_dir(struct kernfs_node *kn,
 				      struct rdt_resource_final *f)
 {
-	struct kernfs_node *kn_subdir, *kn_ctrl;
+	struct kernfs_node *kn_subdir, *kn_ctrl, *kn_ctrl_def = NULL;
+	struct resctrl_ctrl *ctrl, *ctrl_def = NULL;
 	struct rdt_resource *r = f->res;
-	struct resctrl_ctrl *ctrl;
-	char ctrl_full_name[20];
 	int ret;
 
 	kn_subdir = kernfs_create_dir(kn, "resource_schemata", kn->mode, f);
@@ -2808,19 +2827,41 @@ static int resctrl_mkdir_schemata_dir(struct kernfs_node *kn,
 			return ret;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Create the default control sub-dir first. Emulated controls are
+	 * nested underneath it and may be iterated before it, so it has to
+	 * exist before the rest of the controls are created.
+	 */
 	for_each_resource_ctrl(ctrl, f->res) {
-		ret = snprintf(ctrl_full_name, sizeof(ctrl_full_name), "%s%s%s",
-			       f->name, resctrl_ctrl_is_default(ctrl) ? "" : "_",
-			       resctrl_ctrl_is_default(ctrl) ? "" : resctrl_ctrl_name_str(ctrl->name));
-		if (ret >= sizeof(ctrl_full_name))
-			return -ENOSPC;
+		if (ctrl->name != RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_DEF)
+			continue;
 
-		kn_ctrl = kernfs_create_dir(kn_subdir, ctrl_full_name, kn_subdir->mode,
-					    ctrl);
-		if (IS_ERR(kn_ctrl))
-			return PTR_ERR(kn_ctrl);
+		ret = resctrl_ctrl_create_subdir(kn_subdir, f, ctrl, &kn_ctrl_def);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		ret = resctrl_add_ctrl_files(kn_ctrl_def, ctrl);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		ctrl_def = ctrl;
+		break;
+	}
 
-		ret = rdtgroup_kn_set_ugid(kn_ctrl);
+	for_each_resource_ctrl(ctrl, f->res) {
+		if (ctrl->name == RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_DEF)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * In legacy mode the emulating control is nested under the
+		 * default control it emulates (the default control's
+		 * emulated_by points at it). In native mode there is no
+		 * emulation, so every control sits directly under
+		 * resource_schemata.
+		 */
+		if (r->mode == RESCTRL_CTRL_LEGACY &&
+		    ctrl_def && ctrl_def->emulated_by == ctrl)
+			ret = resctrl_ctrl_create_subdir(kn_ctrl_def, f, ctrl, &kn_ctrl);
+		else
+			ret = resctrl_ctrl_create_subdir(kn_subdir, f, ctrl, &kn_ctrl);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
index 5d8ea12ae16b..06482e766087 100644
--- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
+++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
@@ -362,12 +362,14 @@ struct resctrl_mon {
  *				has the same name as the resource.
  * @RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_MIN:	"MIN"
  * @RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_MAX:	"MAX"
+ * @RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_NODE:	"NODE"
  */
 enum resctrl_ctrl_name {
 	RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_DEF,
 	RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_MIN,
 	RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_MAX,
-	RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_LAST = RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_MAX
+	RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_NODE,
+	RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_LAST = RESCTRL_CTRL_NAME_NODE
 };
 
 /**
@@ -383,6 +385,8 @@ enum resctrl_ctrl_name {
  *		Specifically, "rdt_resource_final::name"_"resctrl_ctrl::name".
  *		For example, with resource name "MB" and control name "MAX" the
  *		schema entry will be "MB_MAX".
+ * @emulated_by: For an emulated control, points at the control that emulates
+ *		it; NULL if this control is not emulated.
  * @cache:	Cache allocation control properties.
  * @membw:	Bandwidth control properties.
  */
@@ -392,6 +396,7 @@ struct resctrl_ctrl {
 	struct list_head	domains;
 	enum resctrl_ctrl_type	type;
 	enum resctrl_ctrl_name	name;
+	struct resctrl_ctrl	*emulated_by;
 	union {
 		struct resctrl_cache	cache;
 		struct resctrl_membw	membw;
-- 
2.43.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-16 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-16 21:02 [PATCH RFC 00/23] resctrl: MBA control emulation and ARM MPAM MB_NODE support Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 01/23] resctrl: Fix ownership of resource_schemata control subdirectories Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 02/23] arm_mpam: Fix NULL address access issue Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 03/23] resctrl: Expose MBA resource_schemata mode sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 04/23] resctrl: Expose per-control status in resource_schemata Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 06/23] resctrl: Mirror schemata for controls without MBW hardware Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 07/23] resctrl: Rebuild resource_schemata subdirs on MBA mode change Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 08/23] Documentation: resctrl: document MBA control emulation Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:02 ` [PATCH 09/23] resctrl: De-hardcode L3 monitor infrastructure Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 10/23] resctrl: Expose MBA MBM counter assignment sysfs Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 11/23] resctrl: name node-scoped monitor domains mon_NODE_<id> Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 12/23] resctrl: Add node-scope MBM total event Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 13/23] resctrl: Make MBM paths resource-aware Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 14/23] arm_mpam: Support memory-level MSCs and ABMC per class Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 15/23] arm_mpam: Refine L3 topology and class selection Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 16/23] arm_mpam: Include all MSC components during domain setup Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 17/23] arm_mpam: Handle CPU-less numa nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 18/23] arm_mpam: Emulate MB control with node-scoped MB_NODE control Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 19/23] Documentation: arm64: mpam: document memory-level MB control and NUMA nodes Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 20/23] Documentation: resctrl: document NODE-scoped MBA domains and mon_NODE monitoring Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 21/23] Documentation: resctrl: document MB_NODE emulation example on ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 22/23] arm_mpam: Add KUnit test for CPU-less NUMA node affinity Fenghua Yu
2026-07-16 21:03 ` [PATCH 23/23] selftests/resctrl: Add MB emulation test for ARM MPAM Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260716210329.2914625-5-fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --to=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=fustini@kernel.org \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newtonl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox