From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, vladimir.murzin@arm.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
james.morse@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
maz@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/20] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 18:04:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804170503.3513916-7-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804170503.3513916-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
The arm64 implementation of should_resched() doesn't treat the need to
resched as unlikely, while all other implementations do, e.g.
* asm-generic since:
bdb43806589096ac ("sched: Extract the basic add/sub preempt_count modifiers")
* x86 since:
c2daa3bed53a8117 ("sched, x86: Provide a per-cpu preempt_count implementation")
* s390 since:
c360192bf4a8dc72 ("s390/preempt: move preempt_count to the lowcore")
Do the same for arm64.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
index ca2ad1a8db095..3ef24ab8f3399 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
static inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
{
u64 pc = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->preempt_count);
- return pc == preempt_offset;
+ return unlikely(pc == preempt_offset);
}
static inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 17:04 [PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 8:37 ` David Laight
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 9:14 ` David Laight
2026-08-05 13:02 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 8:28 ` David Laight
2026-08-06 10:23 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] arm64: gpr-num: add __GPR_NUM() helper Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 22:45 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-05 10:27 ` David Laight
2026-08-05 12:50 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-05 6:45 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-05 6:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 11:21 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 12:02 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 13:25 ` David Laight
2026-08-06 13:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 9:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-08-05 12:08 ` David Laight
2026-08-05 13:34 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804170503.3513916-7-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox