From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
vladimir.murzin@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org, maz@kernel.org,
david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
ardb@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 13:08:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805130848.6d533293@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00a85d9a-8727-4b89-b33b-ce2d3358355c@arm.com>
On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 10:24:04 +0100
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
> On 04/08/2026 18:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Use the PCPU GPR infrastructure to implement preemptible this_cpu_read()
> > and this_cpu_write().
> >
> > This change means that this_cpu_read() will always use a plain LDR, even
> > in LTO configurations where READ_ONCE() will use LDA[P]R. Using plain
> > LDR is preferable, given that the rationale for using LDA[P]R in
> > READ_ONCE() was to retain address dependencies against values written by
> > other CPUs, which isn't expected usage for this_cpu_read(). Using plain
> > LDR will enforce fewer ordering constraints.
> >
> > Test case:
> >
> > | void outline_this_cpu_write_u64(u64 __percpu *p, u64 v)
> > | {
> > | this_cpu_write(*p, v);
> > | }
> >
> > Generated code before this patch (v7.2-rc4):
> >
> > | <outline_this_cpu_write_u64>:
> > | paciasp
> > | stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> > | mrs x2, sp_el0
> > | mov x29, sp
> > | ldr w3, [x2, #8]
> > | add w3, w3, #0x1
> > | str w3, [x2, #8]
> > | mrs x3, tpidr_el1
> > | str x1, [x0, x3]
> > | ldr x0, [x2, #8]
> > | sub x0, x0, #0x1
> > | str w0, [x2, #8]
> > | cbz x0, 1f
> > | ldr x0, [x2, #8]
> > | cbnz x0, 2f
> > | 1: bl preempt_schedule_notrace
> > | 2: ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
> > | autiasp
> > | ret
> >
> > Generated code after this patch:
> >
> > | <outline_this_cpu_write_u64>:
> > | mrs x2, sp_el0
> > | mov w3, #0x7c60
> > | strh w3, [x2, #20]
> > | mrs x3, tpidr_el1
> > | str x1, [x0, x3]
> > | strh wzr, [x2, #20]
> > | ret
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> > Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> > ---
> FYI I'm seeing build warnings caused by this patch (with ftrace enabled - based
> on the warnings, I'm guessing that's the key bit), using:
>
> aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.44
>
> I haven't investigated the cause.
It'll be the earlier patch that changed the casts.
The code is doing:
this_cpu_write(tr->array_buffer.data->ftrace_ignore_pid,
FTRACE_PID_IGNORE);
where the constant is -1.
I suspect the warning messages are coming from the switch case that are
optimised away because the size if wrong (ftrace_ignore_pid seems to
be a pid number to ignore and is 32 bits.
That does seem a long-winded way to access per-cpu data.
To make any sense the code must be running with preemption disabled and
be caching info in per-cpu memory.
In which case it can just access it directly.
OTOH it could save the 'global' address of the per-cpu data and then access
it using the pointer so that access would be a normal one.
David
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> ---8<---
> In file included from linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/spectre.h:17,
> from linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47,
> from linux/include/linux/sched.h:13,
> from linux/include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
> from linux/include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
> from linux/include/linux/device.h:15,
> from linux/include/linux/node.h:18,
> from linux/include/linux/cpu.h:17,
> from linux/include/linux/stop_machine.h:5,
> from linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c:17:
> linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c: In function 'ftrace_filter_pid_sched_switch_probe':
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:295:42: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u8' {aka 'unsigned char'} changes value from '18446744073709551615' to '255' [-Woverflow]
> 295 | _pcp_wrap(__percpu_write_8, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:277:20: note: in definition of macro '_pcp_wrap'
> 277 | op(&(pcp), __VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:369:25: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write_1'
> 369 | case 1: stem##1(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
> | ^~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:500:41: note: in expansion of macro '__pcpu_size_call'
> 500 | #define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c:8628:17: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write'
> 8628 | this_cpu_write(tr->array_buffer.data->ftrace_ignore_pid,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:297:43: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u16' {aka 'short unsigned int'} changes value from '18446744073709551615' to '65535' [-Woverflow]
> 297 | _pcp_wrap(__percpu_write_16, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:277:20: note: in definition of macro '_pcp_wrap'
> 277 | op(&(pcp), __VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:370:25: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write_2'
> 370 | case 2: stem##2(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
> | ^~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:500:41: note: in expansion of macro '__pcpu_size_call'
> 500 | #define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c:8628:17: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write'
> 8628 | this_cpu_write(tr->array_buffer.data->ftrace_ignore_pid,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:299:43: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from '18446744073709551615' to '4294967295' [-Woverflow]
> 299 | _pcp_wrap(__percpu_write_32, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:277:20: note: in definition of macro '_pcp_wrap'
> 277 | op(&(pcp), __VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:371:25: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write_4'
> 371 | case 4: stem##4(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
> | ^~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:500:41: note: in expansion of macro '__pcpu_size_call'
> 500 | #define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c:8628:17: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write'
> 8628 | this_cpu_write(tr->array_buffer.data->ftrace_ignore_pid,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c: In function 'ignore_task_cpu':
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:295:42: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u8' {aka 'unsigned char'} changes value from '18446744073709551615' to '255' [-Woverflow]
> 295 | _pcp_wrap(__percpu_write_8, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:277:20: note: in definition of macro '_pcp_wrap'
> 277 | op(&(pcp), __VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:369:25: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write_1'
> 369 | case 1: stem##1(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
> | ^~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:500:41: note: in expansion of macro '__pcpu_size_call'
> 500 | #define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c:8898:17: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write'
> 8898 | this_cpu_write(tr->array_buffer.data->ftrace_ignore_pid,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:297:43: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u16' {aka 'short unsigned int'} changes value from '18446744073709551615' to '65535' [-Woverflow]
> 297 | _pcp_wrap(__percpu_write_16, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:277:20: note: in definition of macro '_pcp_wrap'
> 277 | op(&(pcp), __VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:370:25: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write_2'
> 370 | case 2: stem##2(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
> | ^~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:500:41: note: in expansion of macro '__pcpu_size_call'
> 500 | #define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c:8898:17: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write'
> 8898 | this_cpu_write(tr->array_buffer.data->ftrace_ignore_pid,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:299:43: warning: conversion from 'long unsigned int' to 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'} changes value from '18446744073709551615' to '4294967295' [-Woverflow]
> 299 | _pcp_wrap(__percpu_write_32, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:277:20: note: in definition of macro '_pcp_wrap'
> 277 | op(&(pcp), __VA_ARGS__); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:371:25: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write_4'
> 371 | case 4: stem##4(variable, __VA_ARGS__);break; \
> | ^~~~
> linux/include/linux/percpu-defs.h:500:41: note: in expansion of macro '__pcpu_size_call'
> 500 | #define this_cpu_write(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_write_, pcp, val)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> linux/kernel/trace/ftrace.c:8898:17: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_write'
> 8898 | this_cpu_write(tr->array_buffer.data->ftrace_ignore_pid,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ---8<---
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 17:04 [PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 8:37 ` David Laight
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 9:14 ` David Laight
2026-08-05 13:02 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 8:28 ` David Laight
2026-08-06 10:23 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] arm64: gpr-num: add __GPR_NUM() helper Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 22:45 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-05 10:27 ` David Laight
2026-08-05 12:50 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-05 6:45 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-05 6:47 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 11:21 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 11:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 12:02 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 13:25 ` David Laight
2026-08-06 13:30 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-05 9:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-08-05 12:08 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-08-05 13:34 ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805130848.6d533293@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox